HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. HP is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.4. HP holds a 2.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

2,756 Views
2,273 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Read 11 Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud reviews

547 Views
391 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud both offer robust solutions for endpoint protection. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud seems to have the upper hand, offering more comprehensive features that many users find justify its cost.

Features: HP Wolf Security is praised for its advanced threat detection, isolation capabilities, integration with existing hardware, and ease of use. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud includes advanced encryption, cloud-assisted protection, and detailed reporting tools. Its features are more expansive and better cater to complex needs.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security could improve by offering more flexible customization options and enhancing its management console. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud could benefit from performance impact improvements, a more streamlined update process, and reducing the technical knowledge required for setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is known for straightforward deployment, quick setup times, and excellent customer support. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud requires more technical knowledge for initial setup but is highly rated for customer service responsiveness and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is seen as a cost-effective solution with a good balance of cost and features. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is more expensive but users believe the extensive features justify the cost. The pricing tends to be higher with ROI favorable, depending on the need for its advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,476 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

33rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (31st)

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Ransomware Protection (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 2.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

AnikIslam

Senior Executive at Lakdhanavi Limited

Automatic update feature could be better and multi-layered protection capability needs enhancement

The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective. It also provides web threat protection by blocking unwanted websites. It provides multi-layered protection. Although it could be more efficient, it is sufficient for regular purposes. I would not recommend it based on my experience. I rate it a three out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"In terms of software performance, it has been effective in providing good security."

"In Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, anti-phishing and anti-malware are two very powerful aspects."

"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."

"The standout features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud include its cloud-based console and the simplicity of managing endpoints."

"Kaspersky has a Cloud Discovery feature. There is no template in Kaspersky. They provide a temporary risk assessment of the cloud services. For example, if we want to block public storage services like OneDrive or Google Drive, we need to specify each individually. The main difference is that Kaspersky's process takes more time because it requires individual input."

"The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization."

"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."

"It is a powerful tool for zero-day attack prevention."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pros

Cons

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"One area where the product could be improved is in its delivery and installation process."

"The tool's update management can be better. In future releases, the addition of a DLP module would be valuable."

"Sometimes, the tool consumes a lot of resources from the endpoints, making it an area of concern where improvements are required since it currently consumes a little bit of RAM."

"Kaspersky's cloud solution should be improved because the on-premises features are unavailable in the cloud."

"Kaspersky's global ranking has been on the decline."

"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."

"The solution’s stability could be improved because we earlier faced an issue where the solution was not detecting file-less malware."

"While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"We had to pay an annual licensing fee for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud."

"I find Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud more accessible in terms of pricing."

"The product’s price is flexible."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."

"Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is a cost-effective solution."

"The platform is expensive."

"The product is averagely priced."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product is a bit expensive and requires extensive price negotiation with local vendors. Comparable to market pricing, good products generally have similar pricing levels.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed. The quality of suppor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 16% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

April 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud report

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

All you need to protect Windows desktops and file servers, Mac OS devices, iOS and Android mobiles and even Microsoft Oﬀice 365.

Just sign up for an account instead of getting tied up in hardware and software provisioning.

Pre-defined policies are automatically applied to each newly connected device, delivering immediate protection.

Be anywhere and protect anywhere using a cloud-based console.

Secure geographically separated oﬀices, home or field-based workers, at their desks or on the go regardless of device type.

Enable remote encryption to make sure your corporate data is safe, even if a device gets lost or stolen.

Shadow IT discovery manages uncontrolled sharing of corporate data in the cloud and reveals users wasting time on social media and messengers.

Ensure compliance readiness with a Data Discovery audit of your personal and financial data in the cloud.

Enable safe collaboration and communication in Microsoft Oﬀice 365 - protection for all its major apps is already included in the Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Plus and Pro tiers.

Root Cause Analysis provides an attack visualization so you can see the cause and path of an attack.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) provides simple investigation tools an effortless response to evasive threats.

Advance your skills with online cybersecurity training included in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pro.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Valspar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.