HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Flex System comparison

"The scalability has been good."

"The product is quite stable. Its performance is reliable."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its high availability."

"They are reliable, and they hardly break down. They are fast, and they serve us very well."

"One of the most valuable features I have found to be the enclosure. It is really easy to manage and everything is integrated. You are able to upgrade the software quite easily."

"They have served different needs for us from virtualized web servers to dedicated databases and application servers."

"The solution has good performance."

"Basically, in a cluster, it works really nicely, especially within a cluster environment. Also, it's easily configurable."

"Flex System's best features are its performance and stability."

"The Lenovo Flex System is very stable."

"The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is its ease of use."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system."

"We use the solution as a compute model to run the compute load on servers."

"The product is very user-friendly and has many resources at the enterprise level."

"The tool must provide integration with the cloud."

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest enhancing the stability of the HPE BladeSystem, especially regarding network connectivity. We once had an issue where a system didn’t communicate with the network, and it took a while to diagnose the problem. Eventually, we discovered it was a motherboard issue, but we initially thought it was the network card. Improving the onboard administratordashboard to provide more granular insights, like clearly identifying faultycomponents, would make troubleshooting much more efficient. Aside from that, the system is superb and has been reliable."

"It could always use new tools."

"The only side that must be improved is the active-passive interconnect module architecture."

"The support you get is dependant on the region. Some regions are better than others."

"They could include some embedded software for container technology."

"HPE has a replacement system called Synergy, though it’s a more high-end system than the old C7000."

"I would like to see the upgrade path a little bit smoother."

"I had some difficulties with the initial setup."

"Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved."

"The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one."

"Continuing the production of this product is necessary. It is currently out of support, and we are seeking support from other sources besides Lenovo."

"The solution's firmware and driver upgrades are a bit difficult."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration with other platforms."

"The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system."

"Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

"The price of HPE BladeSystem could improve. They need to reduce the price to be able to compete better with other vendors, such as Dell."

"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."

"BladeSystem is a little bit cheaper."

"​The price could be cheaper."

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

"We have an annual license."

"The price for HPE BladeSystem can vary between $100,000 to $1 million or above. The price can be high."

"We are just paying the operational cost, which is not much."

"The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."

"There is a one-off payment to buy the equipment and the support is purchased annually."

"We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing."

"The 14 blade server allows significant room for upscaling before having to invest in another chassis. You would have to purchase another chassis much sooner in the case of an eight or nine blade server."

"The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier."