Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE BladeSystem vs PowerEdge C comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem
Ranking in Blade Servers
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
138
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PowerEdge C
Ranking in Blade Servers
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Density Optimized Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 13.8%, down from 17.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PowerEdge C is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers
 

Featured Reviews

JuanDuque - PeerSpot reviewer
Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up
It is very straightforward to set up. It's not complex. The length of deployment depends on the way that you configure the Blades. For example, if you're going to work with VMware, the time could be at least 25 to 30 minutes. It is not going to depend on the BladeSystem; it is going to depend on the time of the operate system deployed. The number of people you need for maintenance depends on the monitoring system that you have. For example, if you have a good monitoring system for this platform you're going to need less than ten specialists, but if you don't have a monitoring system to check the platform, probably you're going to need more than ten people.
Niraj  Shah - PeerSpot reviewer
Good return on investment, round the clock technical support, and easy to install
PowerEdge C is used in both corporate and industrial settings One of the main features that attract customers to buy their products is the great management tool and almost zero failure rate, making it easy to use. As far as I'm concerned, the current product works perfectly fine and I don't see…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has good scalability."
"They are reliable, and it's relatively easy to manage them. They also regularly provide patching for the servers."
"The product has been simple to set up."
"Wide choice in mixing SAN and LAN."
"It also has a pretty solid design and management."
"It is a stable, dependable solution."
"The product is quite stable. Its performance is reliable."
"The most valuable feature, of course, is its size as I can build a huge compute resource on it."
"The performance is good."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The security of the product is very good."
"I like the feature that allows for a backup and that is suitable for me."
"PowerEdge servers have high CPU processing power, and the support is also good."
"It was not complex to deploy."
"The scalability of the product is good since it offers high performance and capacity."
"It is a scalable platform."
 

Cons

"It is lacking in the ability to replicate virtual machines more easily."
"I'd like to see an all-in-one packet in the future."
"I would like OneView to go over the current limit of 40 instances."
"Really look at it closely, but really look at the Synergy product as well. That seems to me like that's the next evolution of the BladeSystem."
"HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring."
"If you compare it with Lenovo systems, the pricing is too high."
"They could include some embedded software for container technology."
"It would be nice if the solution were cheaper."
"The price must be improved."
"It should be improved in terms of future expansion. We should be able to have additional free slots for future extensions in terms of memory."
"For improvements, the iDRAC application isn't very intuitive to handle."
"The pricing of PowerEdge solutions is very high nowadays."
"There could be some more ports added in the future."
"It would be better if the solution provided simplified storage and hardware with an integrated one-tier architecture."
"The need to update the firmware and check if there is any bug in the product is one of the areas where Dell PowerEdge C falls short and needs to make improvements."
"Customer service and support have been generally helpful but can be slow due to the need to navigate different specialists."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
"The licensing is on an annual basis."
"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
"The price for HPE BladeSystem can vary between $100,000 to $1 million or above. The price can be high."
"It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
"BladeSystem is a little bit cheaper."
"The price of HPE BladeSystem could improve. They need to reduce the price to be able to compete better with other vendors, such as Dell."
"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."
"The cost depends on the configuration."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"PowerEdge C is very expensive, but personally, I think it's worth the price."
"The licensing cost of PowerEdge C is very high."
"We buy licenses for the solution's advanced features."
"There is a need to pay towards the annual subscription-based licensing model offered by the solution. The product is moderately priced. Price is a critical issue, and it is always good to have moderately priced solutions."
"PowerEdge C is a reasonably priced product, and the pricing depends on how many years you need the product. The cost also includes the support."
"I don't handle the financial aspects, so I don't know the exact costs, but in terms of the value it brings, it's worth it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?
For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...
What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?
The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?
In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.
What do you like most about PowerEdge C?
The solution provides good support and service.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PowerEdge C?
PowerEdge is quite a costly solution, and I would rate the pricing around seven or eight on a scale from one to ten with ten being the most expensive.
What needs improvement with PowerEdge C?
With reference architectures like VX rack, the update process is quite painful. They could automate or simplify it more. There are prerequisites to go through, and that's usually the only time-cons...
 

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EMIS Health
NxtGen Datacenter, Medien-Service Untermain (MSU), Exasol, IndigoVision, Dayco
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. PowerEdge C and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.