HPE System Management Homepage vs Infraon IMS comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and EverestIMS are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while EverestIMS is ranked #28. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.8% mindshare in SM, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

HPE System Management Homepage

Read 8 HPE System Management Homepage reviews

564 Views
454 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

173 Views
89 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE System Management Homepage

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

HPE System Management Homepage and Infraon IMS are competing in the IT infrastructure management arena. Based on the comparisons, Infraon IMS seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and better long-term value.

Features: HPE System Management Homepage offers comprehensive hardware monitoring, detailed performance metrics, and useful troubleshooting capabilities. Infraon IMS includes extensive automation capabilities, seamless integration with third-party tools, and robust reporting features.

Room for Improvement: HPE System Management Homepage could improve its scalability, update its design, and enhance user experience. Infraon IMS could benefit from more intuitive navigation, enhanced support documentation, and additional user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE System Management Homepage has a straightforward deployment process and good customer service, but some users encounter difficulties with initial configurations. Infraon IMS is noted for efficient deployment and excellent support, making it easier to adopt and implement.

Pricing and ROI: HPE System Management Homepage has an affordable setup cost but ongoing costs can accumulate over time, delivering satisfactory ROI. Infraon IMS, while more expensive upfront, is perceived as offering higher ROI due to its advanced feature set and better long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE System Management Homepage vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Infraon IMS

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE System Management Homepage

Ranking in Server Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Server Monitoring

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (87th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (60th), Cloud Monitoring Software (44th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Juan Esteban

Consultant at Freelance

Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part

The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Maharajan S

VSO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization

The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."

"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

Cons

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is fair."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE System Management?

The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?

My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE System Management?

The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 81% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 9% of the time

More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors

ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS

Compared 40% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 32% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 28% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

March 2025

Download HPE System Management Homepage product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

April 2025

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

HP System Management

Everest IMS

Overview

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Infraon IMS is used for monitoring network status, managing critical IT infrastructure, and ensuring connectivity. It helps organizations automate processes, gain network insights, and manage firewalls in private and cloud environments.

Infraon IMS is designed to assist in monitoring leased lines, switches, data center services, and devices across different environments. It provides alerts, manages assets, supports ITSM rules, and handles ticketing and incident management. With its comprehensive reporting on uptime, downtime, and memory utilization, Infraon IMS delivers detailed insights facilitating efficient infrastructure management. The platform integrates seamlessly with various systems and simplifies operations through real-time network monitoring, customizable reports, and a role-based access control system.

What are Infraon IMS's key features?

Stable Performance: Ensures reliability and efficiency in monitoring and management tasks.
Ease of Customization: Allows adjustments to meet specific requirements.
Real-Time Dashboards: Enhances usability for non-technical users through intuitive interfaces.
Role-Based Access: Facilitates secure, controlled management.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines operations with various platforms.
Alerting Mechanisms: Improves incident response with timely notifications.
Workflow Automation: Simplifies and accelerates routine processes.
Graphical User Interface: Increases user-friendliness and insight accessibility.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Automated Processes: Reduces manual effort, increasing efficiency.
Network Insights: Provides detailed data for proactive management.
Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers valuable information for decision-making.
Enhanced Security: Manages firewalls and links to ensure robust security.

Infraon IMS is implemented across diverse industries to manage and monitor IT infrastructures, from small to large-scale environments. It is especially beneficial in sectors needing reliable connectivity and efficient incident management, such as telecommunications, finance, and cloud service providers. The platform aids these industries in maintaining operational continuity and optimizing resource allocation.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Infotec

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Infraon IMS

April 2025

Free Report: HPE System Management Homepage vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE System Management Homepage vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE System Management Homepage vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.