We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is easy to manage."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The performance is good."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is a reasonably priced, easy to use, stable and reliable product."
"It is a highly scalable platform."
"I would say that the user experience is pretty good in this solution as well as the roaming solution part of it."
"The indoor WiFi connection works well."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"It offers very good pricing."
"It offers fair pricing."
"I like that it's cheaper and inexpensive. It's also easy to use."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"It should be a faster device."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"Tech support is mostly remote and could be better."
"They should make more advanced features for the power users. I am a technician and I am functional, but I do need some features that I find only in Microsoft."
"They should have more VLAN features and a designing tool like a link planer."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve stability."
"The network setup could be a little easier and more straightforward."
"I would prefer if the solution offered more integration capabilities."
"Better third-party integration would be helpful because often, Ubiquity is a product that customers choose after they already have something else from another vendor like HPE."
"Better security is important because we need to have some degree of control over who is connected and how we can restrict the level of connectivity."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.