Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hygraph vs IBM FileNet comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Hygraph
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
43rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM FileNet
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Hygraph is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.5%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Hygraph?
Share your opinion
Moshe Elbaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 23, 2024
A stable content management solution for document management
IBM FileNet is an enterprise content management solution. We use the solution for document management in the legal, insurance, and banking sectors We're implementing an on-premise solution. We're handling the installation of the product and customizing it to build a customized application…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"When it comes to pricing, IBM needs to make an effort to improve the cost. That's the main issue regarding use of FinalNet in Columbia."
"The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do."
"It is still a leading ECM solution provider, however the cost to implement and maintain are higher than other solutions."
"Licensing costs depend on the size of the storage."
"For the medium scale or large scale, I would recommend FileNet. FileNet is free of licensing expenses, thus good for the money. It is not expensive, but worth for the money, especially for medium scale and large scale industries."
"We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency."
"It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed."
"Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Insurance Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about IBM FileNet?
The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?
The product is expensive. The price was 30% higher than what we needed to pay for IBM. I rate the product’s pricing a ten out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?
The user interface of IBM content management, including the ability to customize screens without the need for coding, could be improved. Customers can use it to split the screen, enhancing its suit...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.