IBM FileNet vs OpenText Extended ECM comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7. IBM holds a 10.5% mindshare in ECM, compared to OpenText’s 11.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IBM FileNet

Read 101 IBM FileNet reviews

3,501 Views
2,225 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Extended ECM

Read 21 OpenText Extended ECM reviews

3,195 Views
2,455 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM FileNet

OpenText Extended ECM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

IBM FileNet and OpenText Extended ECM are competing in the enterprise content management category. OpenText Extended ECM appears to have the upper hand with its superior integration capabilities enhancing its functionality.

Features: IBM FileNet is known for its strong governance and compliance features, providing excellent data security. It also offers robust document management and scalability. OpenText Extended ECM stands out with its seamless integration with business applications, enhanced collaboration, and workflow management. Additionally, it benefits from strong search and indexing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM FileNet could enhance deployment flexibility and more user-friendly interface options. Improving initial deployment costs could also be beneficial. OpenText Extended ECM could improve its information governance features, strengthen compliance capabilities, and optimize document security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Extended ECM offers flexible cloud deployment options, which enhance scalability and provide quicker response times in customer service. IBM FileNet, with its traditional on-premises deployment, suits organizations with stringent security needs and offers a reliable support process.

Pricing and ROI: IBM FileNet generally incurs higher initial setup costs due to its on-premises nature but offers long-term ROI through data security and compliance benefits. In contrast, OpenText Extended ECM's cloud-based model provides a more economical entry point, reducing infrastructure costs and delivering faster ROI through improved integration.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Extended ECM Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Extended ECM

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM FileNet

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

101

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Extended ECM

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Content Collaboration Platforms (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.5%, up from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Extended ECM is 11.5%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Emad Rizki

System integrator at Indépendant

Facilitates seamless integration for large enterprises with strong deployment capabilities

FileNet was scalable and could be implemented into big multinational organizations. However, it has become very expensive recently. Compared to low-code solutions such as Appian and outsystems, FileNet has gaps, mainly because it requires coding, which is not preferred by clients due to pricing concerns in Pakistan. We transitioned clients to cloud solutions, although FileNet has been strongly integrated with on-prem deployments.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Enables effective document control yet requires better affordability and clarity

I use extended ECM for procurement, sales, engineering documents, and sometimes invoices and accounts payable or receivable The version controls and the business workspace part integrate well with SAP and OpenText, providing granular level control over who accesses the workspace. The seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way in which it enables clients and customers to quickly access the content and information that they use for everyday functions."

"Instead storing our documents offsite, we are storing all of our documents electronically."

"It improves the time when providing customer service to our constituents."

"The main features we find impactful are the workflow and document management along with FileNet file stores."

"FileNet can for sure cover the requirements of a medium and a big company, because of the scalability and the possibility to connect with many other IBM products."

"The most useful feature is its persistent storage. Also, the full-text search and attribute searching are valuable."

"We are able to find the proper documents which are needed for business processes."

"Gves us the ability to create an end-to-end [document] transaction."

More IBM FileNet pros

"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."

"Scalability is great. We can extend areas horizontally and vertically."

"The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."

"WebReports has a lot of capabilities that offer good opportunities to customize the applications the way we want to."

"OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information."

"We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful."

"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."

"An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector."

More OpenText Extended ECM pros

Cons

"I would like to see expanded search features, like content search."

"The area of migrations to new versions must be made easier. It's quite good that they have now begun to improve the API area, to modernize the interfaces, but there's always a very big investment involved in migrating from one version to another. That prohibits rolling out new functionalities to customers. It's not so easy.... In that area, they really must improve."

"The FileNet API seems like it is very difficult and not transparent."

"I would like IBM to improve with each release, continue moving towards a continual, tighter integration, and build solutions that take advantage of all the different modules the platform has from one place."

"If I had a concern, it would be that we are sometimes not getting to the root cause of the issues from a technical standpoint as quickly as we should. For the most part, it's good. However, when things get a bit dicey with more involved issues, we have had some delays in getting feedback. If I had a concern, it's around the technical support and their responses in regards to things like root cause analysis."

"There is room for improvement in the scanning solution, Datacap. It's improving all the time. But since it's more an end-user software, the end-users are constantly improving their processes, and I believe that sometimes we're not catching up with their requirements."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"The analytics in FileNet are too complicated and they consume too much infrastructure, memory, and CPU. They're too expensive to work with."

More IBM FileNet cons

"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."

"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."

"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."

"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."

"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."

"We had some issues with scalability in the production. So, I would rate it a five out of ten."

"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."

"More out-of-the-box automation features should be added to OpenText Extended ECM."

More OpenText Extended ECM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."

"The platform is inexpensive."

"The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year."

"FileNet is not cheap, but you absolutely get what you pay for. "

"For small scale industries, they allow different options. They can do open source. It is the complexity of the data security that they should think about before they choose."

"Licensing costs depend on the size of the storage."

"The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do."

"FileNet is quite expensive, although Documentum is expensive too."

More IBM FileNet pricing and cost advice

"Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."

"The product is pricey."

"The total cost of the product will vary on the capabilities required"

"The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."

"OpenText Extended ECM's pricing and licensing are aggressive and confusing for the end customer."

"It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."

More OpenText Extended ECM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM FileNet?

The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?

The product has become more expensive and requires significant investment for enterprise solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?

FileNet needs improvement in pricing as it has become very expensive. Also, in comparison to local solutions, the need for coding is a disadvantage.

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText Content Suite Platform?

We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into wher...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost of the product could be improved. Currently, there are certain snags in document viewing, and communication from the pre-sales team is not clear. The expectation from the customer versus t...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Documentum vs IBM FileNet

Compared 16% of the time

SharePoint vs IBM FileNet

Compared 16% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs IBM FileNet

Compared 8% of the time

Alfresco vs IBM FileNet

Compared 7% of the time

IBM ECM vs IBM FileNet

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM FileNet Competitors

OpenText Documentum vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 22% of the time

SharePoint vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 19% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 7% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs OpenText Extended ECM

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Extended ECM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM FileNet

March 2025

Download IBM FileNet product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Extended ECM

March 2025

Download OpenText Extended ECM product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Core Share

Overview

IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

IBM

OpenText Extended ECM (formerly OpenText Content Suite Platform) is an enterprise content management platform that securely governs the information lifecycle by integrating with leading enterprise applications, such as SAP, Microsoft 365, Salesforce and SAP SuccessFactors. Bringing content and processes together, Extended ECM provides access to information when and where it’s needed, improves decision-making and drives operational effectiveness.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.

ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project

Buyer's Guide

IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Extended ECM

March 2025

Free Report: IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Extended ECM

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Extended ECM and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM FileNet vs. OpenText Extended ECM report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.