Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hyper-V vs IBM PowerVM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Hyper-V customer service is usually rated positively, with varied support experiences and helpful documentation, though regional support varies.
Sentiment score
6.5
IBM PowerVM customer service is highly regarded for responsiveness, knowledgeable support, and effective issue resolution, despite some service gaps.
The technical support is very good
IBM provides strong support.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Hyper-V is resource-intensive with limited features, complex networking, and integration issues, making it less efficient than competitors.
Sentiment score
5.1
IBM PowerVM requires enhanced interface, automation, integration, and pricing to improve virtualization performance and operational efficiency.
I suggest improvements in platform support and performance considerations for Hyper-V.
We have a strong relationship with IBM, which aids decision-making in transitioning clients from mainframe to other platforms.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.3
Hyper-V is scalable and flexible but may face limitations compared to VMware, especially without proper architecture and planning.
Sentiment score
7.9
IBM PowerVM is scalable and flexible, supporting large deployments but configurability may depend on initial investment and model.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.1
Hyper-V is cost-effective with flexible licensing, centralized management, and competitive pricing, though initial setup can be costly.
Sentiment score
4.3
IBM PowerVM's high pricing, lack of transparency, and negotiation needs are offset by performance, reliability, and unlimited usage benefits.
Until 2019, Hyper-V was a cost-effective solution because it was available as a free product.
Pricing is a concern in Argentina due to the higher cost of mainframe solutions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Hyper-V is praised for stability and uptime but may face issues due to external factors like IT infrastructure.
Sentiment score
8.4
IBM PowerVM is highly stable and reliable, outperforming competitors in handling secure, critical data operations with minimal maintenance.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Hyper-V offers cost-effective virtualization with scalability, high availability, live migration, easy management, and seamless Microsoft integration.
Sentiment score
8.1
IBM PowerVM offers efficient resource management, ensuring reliability with 99.999% availability and supports dynamic allocation with minimal downtime.
The most valuable features of Hyper-V include high availability and management for virtual machine management.
PowerVM excels in efficiently managing all systems and environments, including development, UI, and production.
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyper-V
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
139
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM PowerVM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Hyper-V is 15.1%, down from 17.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM PowerVM is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ramon Ruiz - PeerSpot reviewer
A cost-effective solution with easy configuration and integration with Azure
Scaling was a major issue with Hyper-V—it wasn't scalable and didn't work well. The only way to get it functioning was to manage everything manually, starting with the installation. Now, it's much more scalable, but the key is to plan the architecture based on the workloads you want to offer. You need to design an architecture that can handle the demands of heavy workloads. If the customer has different types of workloads, each requires a tailored architecture. Using the same setup for all workloads will lead to inefficiencies and wasted time and resources. To ensure scalability, it's crucial to build the infrastructure correctly, especially regarding storage, networking, CPU, and RAM resources. When done properly, Hyper-V scales very well.
Atif Najam - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable system for high-end data processing with a great support structure
The only problem with the IBM system is improving its hardware licensing model. For example, when you procure a server with 40 physical codes, you must also procure licenses to activate the codes. In Dell or any system, you procure the hardware and have the full right to use the hardware. For IBM, it's different because when you procure a 40-code processor and have 40 physical codes, you only have a license to use 20. As a result, the 20 alert codes will always be in activated mode. Hence, the hardware licensing model could be improved because the licensing model is a bit different from the standard hardware procured.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user234735 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2015
Hyper-V 2012 R2 vs. VMware vSphere 5.5
I was won with Hyper-V 2012R2 recently and the table below based on customer RFP (edited). This articles all about technical, there is not related with TCO/ROI, licensing cost, “political”, etc. Another to noted is the Windows Server 2012 licenses is based on 2 socket CPU, meanwhile…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
37%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does KVM compare with Hyper-V?
KVM is better. But let's just look at the software instead of judging. Hyper-V was a free solution from Microsoft to virtualize Server or Client OS as it is a feature on Windows Server since 2008 a...
How does Proxmox VE compare with Hyper-V?
One of the best things about Proxmox VE is that it is open-source and very inexpensive. You get all of the same features as with the more well-known products. Proxmox VE is very easy to deploy - it...
What do you like most about Hyper-V?
The initial setup is not difficult at all. It is very easy.
What do you like most about IBM PowerVM?
Managing other operating systems is also straightforward with IBM PowerVM.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM PowerVM?
Pricing is a concern in Argentina due to the higher cost of mainframe solutions. This becomes a significant factor in migration decisions.
What needs improvement with IBM PowerVM?
The pricing is expensive, which poses a financial challenge, especially in Argentina. We have a strong relationship with IBM, which aids decision-making in transitioning clients from mainframe to o...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
PowerVM
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Large customer base from all industries, all over the world. Two major Hyper-V customers are Telefonica and EmpireCLS.
Sto, Soitec, SNO, Bundesrechenzentrum GmbH, Al Mansour Holding, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Huhtamaki, ELK Group, IT-Informatik, Arkansas Tech University, Pneuhage
Find out what your peers are saying about Hyper-V vs. IBM PowerVM and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.