Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM PowerVM vs KVM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
PowerVM saves costs by charging for allocated cores, proving more cost-effective and reliable than physical servers over five years.
Sentiment score
8.5
KVM users save $20,000 monthly due to its open-source nature, eliminating license fees and offering cost-effective virtualization.
The return on investment is substantial, though other platforms may offer a better ROI, primarily due to lower costs involved in setup and maintenance.
Drirector at a construction company with 201-500 employees
If calculated over a five-year period, IBM PowerVM is 30 to 40% more cost-effective than physical servers despite initial costs seeming high.
Solution Sales Specialist at TD SYNNEX
KVM definitely saves costs since it is open-source and does not obligate us to pay for licenses as necessary with other virtualization solutions.
Chief Technology Officer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.8
IBM PowerVM's support is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though challenges arise without subscriptions; stability minimizes service need.
Sentiment score
8.7
KVM relies on community support; effectiveness varies, with some preferring paid options like Red Hat for dedicated assistance.
IBM offers excellent customer support.
IT Specialist at Saudi Business Machines - SBM
IBM provides strong support.
Drirector at a construction company with 201-500 employees
IBM's technical support is outstanding, with seamless global coordination and prompt resolutions.
Brand Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Paid support is also obtainable from companies like Red Hat for more critical issues.
Chief Technology Officer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
IBM PowerVM excels in scalability and flexibility, efficiently managing resources and users for both small and large enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.7
KVM offers high scalability for enterprise environments, leveraging Linux kernel architecture, though rapid expansion may challenge larger companies.
An IBM server can handle up to sixty-four terabytes of RAM.
IT Specialist at Saudi Business Machines - SBM
The product is scalable due to PowerVM's virtualization features, such as shared processor functionality and partition mobility.
Brand Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I think IBM PowerVM uses a 'pay as you grow' model, allowing customers to scale their resources as needed.
Solution Sales Specialist at TD SYNNEX
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
IBM PowerVM is praised for exceptional stability and uptime, outperforming competitors like SPARC, Nutanix, and VMware in reliability.
Sentiment score
7.8
KVM is generally stable and reliable, though occasional issues arise during I/O tasks or hardware changes, requiring careful handling.
The stability of IBM PowerVM is exceptional, as industry reports have named IBM Power and Z as the most stable platforms globally for 15 consecutive years.
IT Specialist at Saudi Business Machines - SBM
Our clients in India using Power Servers have been running their servers for the last four to five years without any reboot.
Solution Sales Specialist at TD SYNNEX
The product operates reliably, and following IBM’s best practices ensures robust stability.
Brand Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

IBM PowerVM needs usability, pricing, automation, integration improvements, and a GUI to better compete and enhance user experience.
KVM needs user interface improvements, better networking, enhanced tools, platform compatibility, optimized resources, and improved support and documentation.
We have a strong relationship with IBM, which aids decision-making in transitioning clients from mainframe to other platforms.
Drirector at a construction company with 201-500 employees
From a product perspective, I would like to see faster certification of open-source products on IBM Power Systems.
Brand Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
PowerVM should integrate some capabilities of VMware vCenter to improve its management features.
IT Specialist at Saudi Business Machines - SBM
In comparison to VMware, which offers a more balanced set of management features, KVM could improve in terms of user-friendly tooling.
Chief Technology Officer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

IBM PowerVM pricing is high but offers reliability, flexible licensing, and potential TCO savings despite cheaper alternatives.
KVM is a cost-effective, open-source virtualization platform often preferred over VMware, with affordable support options enhancing its appeal.
PowerVM itself is free with the purchase of an IBM server.
IT Specialist at Saudi Business Machines - SBM
They have introduced a subscription-based model for some systems, creating a more cost-effective solution for customers.
Brand Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Pricing is a concern in Argentina due to the higher cost of mainframe solutions.
Drirector at a construction company with 201-500 employees
Compared to VMware and Microsoft, KVM offers better pricing and licensing options.
Chief Technology Officer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

IBM PowerVM offers stability, flexibility, and high availability with robust virtualization, cloud integration, and optimized workloads for Oracle and SAP HANA.
KVM excels in performance, scalability, ease of management, and security, offering seamless Linux integration and cost-effective virtualization.
Features like partition mobility enhance the machine's capabilities, making it an ideal tool for virtual environments with reliability, availability, and serviceability.
Brand Leader at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
IBM PowerVM supports multiple operating systems such as IBM i, AIX, and Linux, allowing users to run various applications seamlessly in a cloud environment.
Solution Sales Specialist at TD SYNNEX
It supports specific workloads, like Oracle and SAP HANA, much better due to its shared processor pool feature which reduces licensing costs.
IT Specialist at Saudi Business Machines - SBM
The most valuable feature of KVM is its superior real-time performance, which results in lower latency compared to alternatives like VMware and Microsoft.
Chief Technology Officer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM PowerVM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
KVM
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of IBM PowerVM is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KVM is 8.8%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
KVM8.8%
IBM PowerVM1.4%
Other89.8%
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

MR
Solution Sales Specialist at TD SYNNEX
Seamless migration and versatility enhance cloud transition experience
IBM PowerVM supports multiple operating systems such as IBM i, AIX, and Linux, allowing users to run various applications seamlessly in a cloud environment. The Live Partition Mobility feature, although not detailed in my experience, supports versatile deployment. IBM PowerVM's seamless cloud migration and operating system support make it valuable for clients willing to transition to cloud environments while maintaining reliability.
BB
Chief Technology Officer at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Low latency in mission-critical environments with different virtualization environments
The most valuable feature of KVM is its superior real-time performance, which results in lower latency compared to alternatives like VMware and Microsoft. The ability to switch from one VM to another efficiently, thanks to the implementation of a real-time kernel, ensures delays remain minimal, thereby meeting our organization's performance requirements. This improved latency is critical because any delay in voice transmission could lead to life-threatening situations. Additionally, KVM being open-source means that we are not obligated to pay for licenses, which significantly reduces costs and simplifies license handling for ourselves and on behalf of customers.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM PowerVM?
Managing other operating systems is also straightforward with IBM PowerVM.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM PowerVM?
IBM’s licensing model offers flexibility in subscription terms, now allowing one- to five-year options. They have introduced a subscription-based model for some systems, creating a more cost-effect...
What needs improvement with IBM PowerVM?
From a product perspective, I would like to see faster certification of open-source products on IBM Power Systems ( /products/ibm-power-systems-reviews ). While the product has robust features and ...
Why KVM??? Help please!
KVM scales better, orchestration better, performs better and supports a wider range of hardware and, also, you can implement at ZERO cost and with a very powerful web interface for management, from...
Why KVM??? Help please!
Small support team, small cluster, low core count, use VMware products Large support team, large clusters with many cores, use KVM. KVM scales better, orchestration better, performs better and supp...
Why KVM??? Help please!
Far from being an expert, my opinion is that the positive sides of KVM are: Lower costs and open-source which gives the abilities to customize it according to the specific needs of each customer.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

PowerVM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sto, Soitec, SNO, Bundesrechenzentrum GmbH, Al Mansour Holding, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Huhtamaki, ELK Group, IT-Informatik, Arkansas Tech University, Pneuhage
MediaWiki, Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikidata, Wikiversity, Commons
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM PowerVM vs. KVM and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.