Citrix XenServer vs IBM PowerVM comparison

Citrix and IBM are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Citrix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. Citrix holds a 4.8% mindshare in SVS, compared to IBM’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Citrix XenServer

Read 47 Citrix XenServer reviews

9,623 Views
6,801 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

IBM PowerVM

Read 32 IBM PowerVM reviews

2,333 Views
1,995 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Citrix XenServer

IBM PowerVM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix XenServer and IBM PowerVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 813,161 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Citrix XenServer

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM PowerVM

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Citrix XenServer is 4.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM PowerVM is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Siva Kuppala

Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited

Apr 29, 2024

Allows us to allocate CPU, memory, storage, and network resources across VMs and minimizes downtime in case of hardware failure or maintenance

It is a scalable product and provides great benefits for virtualization needs. However, there are a few considerations: * Cost: Citrix Hypervisor can be fairly expensive. * Complexity: There's a learning curve, especially for those coming from a Microsoft background. Setting it up and managing it can introduce some complexity. * Hardware Support: Not all major hardware vendors fully support Citrix Hypervisor. * Third-party Integration: Integrating Hypervisor with other technologies within a large ecosystem can sometimes be challenging. * Community Support: Compared to solutions like Microsoft Hyper-V, the community support for Citrix Hypervisor is somewhat less extensive. It is not vast. If there are any issues or errors, the community support is not that good. Those are definitely important disadvantages.

Read full review

Atif Najam

Chief Information Officer and Program Lead at Gatron Industries Ltd

Oct 18, 2022

A stable system for high-end data processing with a great support structure

The only problem with the IBM system is improving its hardware licensing model. For example, when you procure a server with 40 physical codes, you must also procure licenses to activate the codes. In Dell or any system, you procure the hardware and have the full right to use the hardware. For IBM, it's different because when you procure a 40-code processor and have 40 physical codes, you only have a license to use 20. As a result, the 20 alert codes will always be in activated mode. Hence, the hardware licensing model could be improved because the licensing model is a bit different from the standard hardware procured.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scripting can automate procedures."

"There's no complexity in using the tool, especially with the VBI integration. It works very well and has proven to be a stable platform. I have experienced attacks, such as ransomware, but my Citrix Hypervisor virtual machines were protected. This is due to its hardened operating system and DNS, which successfully protected the virtual machines on that platform."

"I find it very easy to manage and at a cost that small customers would never refuse (free)."

"The solution integrates well with other solutions, which makes it really strong as a primary solution to deploy."

"The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency."

"Citrix Hypervisor is quick to deploy and easy to manage."

"The compatibility of the solution is its most valuable feature. It's compatible on almost every cloud these days."

"The initial setup is easy."

More Citrix XenServer pros

"You can increase resources with it automatically."

"IBM PowerVM has the highest clock speed."

"Active Memory Sharing dynamically reallocates memory of running partitions based on changing workload demands. The memory for the pool is carved out from Physical memory and is made logical memory. The said memory is not available to be assigned to partitions as dedicated memory. A min, max and desired as well as weight is assigned to the memory of each lpar to help hypervisor make a decision in case a condition where priority is to be given to a certain lapr to use the memory form shared pool."

"The most valuable features in this solution are you do not get degradation in the performance like you could get in other solutions. There is a physical adapter that is better than a virtual one and you can assign adapters to a VM."

"A valuable feature of PowerVM is a feature that is used for higher availability plus stream for posting, which is very useful. There's a flash copy feature which we are using. PowerVM itself, I know, helps us to control and manage our Oracle licensing compliance, since it is our hardware partitioning. This is very important. If you use VMware, there will be a licensing issue. This PowerVM is a hardware partitioner, which is very important for license compliance. We are happy with this solution."

"IBM PowerVM's most valuable feature is stability."

"It's in English, so its exceptional qualities make the control environment more flexible, easier, more stable, and easy to recover after issues."

"The product never fails to work and is very stable in general. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More IBM PowerVM pros

Cons

"Live migration is something that can be improved."

"The USB support for the virtual server needs improvement."

"Citrix could provide more tools to help the client manage the solution because we need to build our own tools in some cases. Everything is available through PowerShell, but then you need to build your own scripts to do the more advanced work."

"I am not very sure about how flexible Citrix Hypervisor is with different types of infrastructures. I only know it is flexible with Nutanix, but I am not sure if it is also flexible with others. They can make its integration with other platforms or OEMs easy. They should also make it easy for users to manage their infrastructure. Citrix should make compatibility information related to a hypervisor easily available in a datasheet. Citrix isn't really recognized in this part of the world, and they need to expand their solution and make it more available. There are a lot of customers and companies that are looking for a solution like Citrix, and it should be available in this part of the world. They need to educate people more. Technically, it is good and flexible and has good ability, but it is not as much known as VMware or Microsoft. Their support should also be improved. Currently, if you don't have an updated version, they will not give you the attention."

"There's a learning curve, especially for those coming from a Microsoft background. Setting it up and managing it can introduce some complexity."

"Overall, I can't think of a feature that is lacking. We've been pretty satisfied overall."

"The solution is too expensive and people are kind of moving away from Citrix. It's starting to become a problem. It is a primary reason that while we are rebuilding we're going to seek out open-source solutions."

"The solution is only in English. It would be ideal if it was in Portuguese."

More Citrix XenServer cons

"IBM PowerVM could improve the price because it is expensive."

"Stability could always be better."

"Automatic LPM is an area that is currently not available in IBM PowerVM, and it is a feature I want to see in the product's future releases."

"The solution's interface needs to be integrated with messaging analysis."

"As understand it, IBM sells all its hardware to Lenovo, and only PCs servers are managed by IBM. It's uncertain how much longer IBM will continue in this way, especially with the current trend of transitioning from on-premises to cloud and hybrid models. The market is evolving. Given this market shift, it's essential to identify areas for improvement. IBM has introduced the PowerVM Series, including Linux, which is a positive step. However, customers are already moving towards x86 servers due to cost considerations. The cost of PowerVM compared to x86 servers appears to be a significant factor."

"The licensing could be better."

"I don't know whether this has been trialed already, but IBM should give us an alert when we reach seven or eight failovers so that we can automatically switch it to manual mode. That would be great because if we cross the 10-day licensing limit, we have to pay a hefty license cost to Oracle. If IBM could view that feature, it would be helpful in license compliance."

"The interface is not user-friendly in places, so it could use some improvement."

More IBM PowerVM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Citrix is a good low-cost alternative to VMware, so if budgeting is an issue then I would recommend it."

"Citrix Hypervisor can be fairly expensive."

"I am fine with their license support. What we have right now is permanent, so I don't have a problem with their license."

"This solution is open source, it's free."

"The most valuable feature is the cost; it is a free product."

"The pricing and licensing is so important. Customers do consider the price seriously."

"The licensing is straight forward based on usage and features."

"We used it only for some desktop licenses, so the pricing is great. We used the free licenses for server virtualization."

More Citrix XenServer pricing and cost advice

"Even if the product is expensive, it works well in the long term. The tool is more or less expensive, and I would presently describe it as an optimally priced product."

"The tool is competitively priced, especially right now."

"The price varies from case to case and you have to negotiate it for every project."

"The pricing for PowerVM is on the higher. Regarding the license, it can be on a monthly or annual basis, depending on the deal. Customers may choose to pay annually, one-time, or monthly based on their agreement with the sales team. As for additional costs, customers need to pay for support if they opt for it. If not, they only pay for the hardware cost as per the agreement."

"IBM PowerVM costs more than other products but the customer does not need to pay additional money for the licenses. In VMware, you need to license everything. With IBM PowerVM it is unlimited and all-inclusive in the price you pay."

"The cost is on the higher side. Typically, we invest in the machine and support for two, three, or five years."

"IBM PowerVM's pricing is cheap."

"The license cost is bundled with IBM Power Systems as it is limited to RISC-based IBM systems only."

More IBM PowerVM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Thang Le Toan (Victory Lee)

CIO at Robusta Technology & Training

Jan 13, 2015

vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer

We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

52%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Hypervisor?

The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Hypervisor?

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being very inexpensive and ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Citrix Hypervisor?

It would be very helpful if I could browse the data store directly in the GUI, similar to VMware and Hyper-V. This feature would be particularly useful when something goes wrong with a virtual mach...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM PowerVM?

Managing other operating systems is also straightforward with IBM PowerVM.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM PowerVM?

The tool is competitively priced, especially right now. It is not only the IBM PowerVM you purchase but also the hardware since, in terms of compatibility, they are built for each other.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM PowerVM?

In terms of the technology used in the product, I feel that there are some areas where improvements are required. The tool should offer better clustering options.

See all answers

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 37% of the time

VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 23% of the time

Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 21% of the time

KVM vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Citrix XenServer

Compared 5% of the time

More Citrix XenServer Competitors

VMware vSphere vs IBM PowerVM

Compared 62% of the time

KVM vs IBM PowerVM

Compared 12% of the time

Hyper-V vs IBM PowerVM

Compared 8% of the time

Proxmox VE vs IBM PowerVM

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs IBM PowerVM

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM PowerVM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Citrix XenServer

October 2024

Download Citrix XenServer product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM PowerVM

October 2024

Download IBM PowerVM product report

Also Known As

Hypervisor

PowerVM

Learn More

Citrix

IBM

Overview

Citrix XenServer is a virtualization platform used in industries such as banking, automotive, and data applications for cloud automation, server virtualization, and VDI scenarios. It supports infrastructure management, virtual machine hosting, and enterprise software deployment, reducing costs by migrating from other platforms.

As a virtualization tool, Citrix XenServer stands out for its ease of maintenance, support, scalability, and centralized management. Commonly deployed on-premises and in data centers, it provides real-time monitoring, live migration, and strong security features. With compatibility across many operating systems, users benefit from a Windows-based management interface that is easy to install and navigate. Integration capabilities with active directory, storage, and load balancing contribute to resource optimization and reliability.

What are the key features of Citrix XenServer?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational expenses across IT environments.
High Performance: Real-time monitoring and live migration support high efficiency.
Security: Strong safeguards protect data and processes.
Management Interface: Windows-based, offering user-friendly controls.
OS Compatibility: Works with a range of operating systems for flexibility.
Advanced Integrations: Active directory, storage, and load balancing maximize resources.

What benefits should users consider in Citrix XenServer reviews?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing demands.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines the installation process for quick setup.
Comprehensive Virtualization: Offers extensive capabilities for seamless operations.
Centralized Management: Facilitates control through XenCenter.

Implementation in banking, automotive, and data applications leverages Citrix XenServer's strengths in cloud automation and virtualization. Organizations manage resources, deploy services, and ensure stable operations within their infrastructure. The platform is used both on-premises and in data centers, aiding in areas such as cost reduction and maintenance efficiency.

Power is server virtualization without limits. Businesses are turning to PowerVM server virtualization to consolidate multiple workloads onto fewer systems, increasing server utilization and reducing cost. PowerVM provides a secure and scalable server virtualization environment for AIX, IBM i and Linux applications built upon the advanced RAS features and leading performance of the Power Systems platform.

Sample Customers

U.S. Army Shared Services Center, SoftLayer, Educational Services of America, Independent Bank, and SK Telecom.

Sto, Soitec, SNO, Bundesrechenzentrum GmbH, Al Mansour Holding, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Huhtamaki, ELK Group, IT-Informatik, Arkansas Tech University, Pneuhage

Buyer's Guide

Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM

October 2024

Free Report: Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM report.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.