Logpoint vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Read 24 Logpoint reviews

3,485 Views
1,917 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

i-SIEM [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Logpoint and i-SIEM [EOL] compete in the SIEM space. Logpoint often has an upper hand with its cost-effective pricing and customer support, while i-SIEM [EOL] stands out with its advanced features.

Features:Logpoint provides intuitive threat detection, automated response capabilities, and accessible interface. i-SIEM [EOL] offers advanced analytics, extended integration options, and comprehensive data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Logpoint features straightforward deployment and effective support. i-SIEM [EOL] has a complex deployment structure requiring significant resources but offers specialized service options.

Pricing and ROI:Logpoint delivers cost-effective pricing and clear ROI with flexible budget options. i-SIEM [EOL] involves higher setup costs with a potential for substantial ROI due to its rich features.

To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Download the complete report

Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

i-SIEM [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Logpoint

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (30th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (29th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (15th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (19th)

Featured Reviews

Dannie Combs

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer at Donnelley Financial Solutions

The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.

empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.

Read full review

Rifat Hasan

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."

"From a monitoring and incident response perspective, empow is the most valuable asset we have in our toolkit."

"I use the product for my research and development to enhance my work."

"The most beneficial was being able to prove, with proper reports, that from a compliance perspective, the company is in control."

"The most valuable feature of LogPoint is that they have the SIEM and SOAR combined in one solution. They are not on a separate platform."

"For on-premises, it is the best solution."

"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."

"The flexibility of the search feature and the solution's analytics features are the most valuable parts of the solution, and it's also very user-friendly."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"We like the user and entity behaviour analytics (UEBA) and find it valuable."

More Logpoint pros

Cons

"Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways."

"Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."

"The solution should offer more integrations and third-party solutions like incident response platforms or allow access to third-party big data"

"The general public wasn't looking for that type of product unless you had a company that was medical or financial and needed 24-hour responsiveness."

"The documentation part is something that needs to be improved, as well as the threat intelligence investigation part."

"Logpoint is not flexible. Its documentation is not user-friendly."

"LogPoint must find a way to integrate the servers without agents."

"It is a good product, but its interface or GUI could be better."

"The interface needs things like wizards that will assist with creating complex correlation rules."

"One of the things we faced last year was that we had some memory issues with the server running. We were running them as virtual services, and we were facing some performance issues. Back then, there were some things that had already been solved at the end, but one of the small issues we had was that it was quite memory-consuming. After one upgrade that we did, we faced some performance issues."

More Logpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."

"With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."

"It's getting more expensive, which is one of the reasons we're looking around just to see if there's anything better value."

"It's less expensive than the competitors. The Logpoint marketing team is very accommodating and client-friendly. They offer very good reductions in price. They are pretty good in this aspect. They are transparent in their licensing and pricing."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"Logpoint's pricing is mid-ranged and depends on the number of devices."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Performing Arts

10%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogPoint?

I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not contact me. Bangladesh already has a Logpoint distributor. In terms of complianc...

See all answers

Comparisons

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix ESM vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

USM Anywhere vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Download i-SIEM [EOL] product report

Download Logpoint product report

Overview

i-SIEM [EOL] is an innovative security information and event management platform designed to enhance threat detection and response capabilities in IT environments.

i-SIEM [EOL] offers a comprehensive approach to managing and analyzing security alerts, ensuring that businesses can effectively mitigate risks. With advanced threat intelligence and robust analytics, it helps organizations streamline their security operations and improve incident response times, providing each organization the information required to make informed security decisions.

What are the most important features of i-SIEM [EOL]?

Real-time Monitoring: Continuously tracks network activity to detect potential threats.
Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes AI to identify sophisticated attacks.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows users to tailor their view and focus on relevant data.
Automated Incident Response: Streamlines the response process by automating certain actions.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced monitoring capabilities reduce risk exposure.
Operational Efficiency: Automation cuts down manual efforts and saves time.
Increased Visibility: Comprehensive insights into activity improve decision-making.
Cost Management: Helps allocate resources more effectively, potentially reducing costs.

i-SIEM [EOL] is particularly beneficial in industries such as finance and healthcare where data security is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure allows seamless adoption, offering enhanced security without disrupting operations. Industries handling sensitive information value its advanced capabilities to safeguard data integrity.

LevelBlue

Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.

Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.

What are the most important features of Logpoint?

Easy-to-use dashboard: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Correlation engine: Connects data for in-depth security insights.
Comprehensive log collection: Facilitates extensive data gathering.
Third-party integrations: Connects seamlessly with other tools.
UEBA and SOAR components: Enhance threat response and automation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides significant value for its pricing.
User-friendly interface: Enhances usability with straightforward design.
Compliance navigation: Eases PCI DSS and GDPR compliance.
Quick support service: Provides responsive customer assistance.

Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.

Sample Customers

University of Oklahoma, Donnelley

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)