Microsoft Entra ID vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management comparison

i-Sprint Innovations and Microsoft are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. i-Sprint Innovations is ranked #29, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. i-Sprint Innovations holds a 0.3% mindshare in SSO, compared to Microsoft’s 27.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of i-Sprint Innovations users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Read 2 i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management reviews

102 Views
68 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 219 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

9,267 Views
6,953 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

i-Sprint AccessMatrix and Microsoft Entra ID compete in the access management category. Microsoft Entra ID seems to have the upper hand due to its feature set and user satisfaction.

Features: i-Sprint AccessMatrix includes comprehensive access control, extensive customization options, and competitive pricing. Microsoft Entra ID integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, has extensive security features, and provides a more integrated feature set.

Room for Improvement: i-Sprint AccessMatrix users suggest enhancing reporting tools, simplifying configuration, and addressing tool complexity. Microsoft Entra ID users recommend better documentation, improved customer support responsiveness, and addressing minor integration issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: i-Sprint AccessMatrix deployment is complex and time-consuming, requiring substantial support. Microsoft Entra ID offers a smoother and more integrated deployment with reliable customer service and extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: i-Sprint AccessMatrix is perceived as cost-effective with good ROI for smaller organizations. Microsoft Entra ID is more expensive but delivers higher ROI through advanced features and integration benefits, justifying the price difference.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,849 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

29th

Ranking in Authentication Systems

41st

Ranking in Access Management

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Ranking in Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

219

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 27.5%, up from 26.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Nobuyuki Ohkawa

CEO at ABILITY LIMITED

A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing

The solution has high support capability. The tool needs to improve its cloud service capability. I have been working with the solution for 15 years. I would rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. I would rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten since it is highly scalable. We…

Read full review

Aaron Liang

System engineer at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Has significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment

Microsoft Entra ID has helped by simplifying our management of permissions for APIs. We are not directly exposing credentials, as we use tokens instead. It has made management easier and more secure, especially in a multi-user environment. The implementation of Microsoft Entra ID significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment, primarily through the widespread use of single-sign-on. Managing API permissions became much easier, as application registration often involves calling an API to utilize services without directly exposing credentials, relying instead on token-based authentication. This streamlined approach benefits end-users by simplifying access while remaining transparent to them. Ultimately, my role focuses on ensuring a smooth and user-friendly experience, even if the underlying technology remains unseen by the end-users. Our company strongly emphasizes passwordless authentication, primarily through device-bound passkeys in Microsoft Authenticator. While administrators with high-privileged accounts utilize YubiKeys and passwords for tasks like accessing Microsoft Graph, we are actively transitioning all other users towards passwordless methods such as Windows Hello biometrics. This approach streamlines authentication and enhances security. Though initial deployment in 2022 presented challenges due to hardware limitations and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the technology has significantly improved and provides a simple and effective user experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."

"The solution has high support capability."

"The most valuable feature is the single sign-on, which allows any application that is SAML or OAuth compatible to use Azure as an identity provider for seamless sign-in."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."

"It has given us the ability to be able to establish single sign-on identities in which we can establish credentials no matter where we are, whether it is on-premises or in the cloud, in a hybrid cloud, or in an additional connection from another cloud where we share equipment or host."

"The most valuable feature of Entra ID is having a cloud-based identity, similar to Google's single sign-on."

"The solution has come a long way. Now, with the Azure AD B2C offering integrated as well, we've got a full IAM-type solution for our customer-facing identity management. In addition, when it comes to user journeys we now can hook in custom flows for different credential checking and authorizations for specific conditional access."

"Conditional access and Privileged Identity Management (PIM) are the most valuable features from a security perspective."

"The solution's ease of use is one of its most valuable features."

"The benefits of using this solution were realized straightaway."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."

"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."

"A nice feature that is not currently present, would be if they had some visualization tools."

"Microsoft Entra ID could benefit from more fine-tuned rights. It is necessary to prevent granting an application or user broad access rights."

"For example, there were some authentication features that, for security purposes, had certain limitations. Those limitations still exist, but the portal now has options so that the customers can make custom features to manage their identity."

"Azure Active Directory could be made easier to use. We have large amounts of data and storage. We are looking for video files and media content for applications, we will think about options, such as cloud storage or a CDN."

"The security policy of Azure Active Directory should be based on a matrix so that we can easily visualize which users have access to what."

"Some systems do not integrate very well with Azure AD. We thought of going for Okta, but later on we were able to achieve it, but not the way we wanted. It was not as easy as we thought it would be. The integration was not very seamless."

"I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement."

"I would rate it an eight out of ten. The price plays a factor in the rating."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten. The tool's licensing is monthly."

"The solution costs us 60,000 Rupees annually, just over $700, and there are no additional costs."

"Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing."

"Be sure: You know your userbase, e.g., how many users you have. You choose the right license and model that suit your business requirements."

"I don't pay for it. Going by how I feel, I see the prices for any MFA solution going down because the more different alternatives there are, the cheaper things should be. Microsoft Authenticator app would be the preferred application, but there are too many ways to implement MFA. I don't know how much it cost, but the price should go down."

"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users."

"From a pricing standpoint, with all the services that we get, we are okay. I do not see a problem with the pricing structure. We are getting our money's worth."

"We got a good deal. If you get rid of all the products providing features that Azure Suite can provide, then it makes sense cost-wise."

"Microsoft Authenticator is included in the package when we purchase a license from Microsoft."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management?

The solution has high support capability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management?

The tool needs to improve its cloud service capability.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management?

I would rate the product a ten out of ten.

See all answers

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Microsoft Entra ID is reportedly quite expensive for each user regarding security features. The renewal cost is particularly high according to the teams managing purchases.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 9% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2025

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management report

Download i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

March 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

i-Sprint Innovations

Microsoft

Overview

AccessMatrix is a suite of integrated ICAM (Identity, Credential, Access Management and Versatile Authentication solutions) that enable organizations to effectively deploy versatile authentication, unified single sign-on, secure credential management services, flexible identity & role administration, externalized authorization, and provide comprehensive data analytics of access to important information assets.

i-Sprint Innovations

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

IRAS, Singapore Bank

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Authentication Systems vendors, and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.