IBM App Connect vs Matillion ETL comparison

IBM and Matillion are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Matillion is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM holds a 3.6% mindshare in CDI, compared to Matillion’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Matillion users who would recommend it.

IBM App Connect

Read 23 IBM App Connect reviews

1,886 Views
1,035 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Matillion ETL

Read 26 Matillion ETL reviews

2,234 Views
1,536 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

Matillion ETL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM App Connect and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM App Connect vs. Matillion ETL Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. Matillion ETL

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Matillion ETL

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM App Connect is 3.6%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Matillion ETL is 4.4%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mehdi El Filahi

Co-Founder at tenekit

Offers flexible adapters, good scalability but logging can be difficult at times

There is room for improvement in the logging messages. Sometimes, if you put someone new into App Connect, they can abandon it the same day. The logging is really painful. However, IBM has made efforts to integrate with Elasticsearch for logging, so that's an improvement. Overall, the logging can be difficult at times. One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient. Back in 2013, I worked with Sonic ESB, and even then, it had CI/CD with Maven. With App Connect, you need to build everything yourself when using tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, or CircleCI. IBM really needs to provide official support for this.

Read full review

AntonHaupt

Data Architect at Capitec

Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration

In our small business unit, we currently have around four users, with two of them utilizing Matillion within our organization. Considering our growing needs, we're contemplating transitioning to an enterprise SaaS solution where we would share the same instance. Currently, each user is billed individually, but consolidating to a shared instance seems more efficient. Scalability is excellent when using the SaaS solution, easily reaching a rating of ten out of ten. Each data pipeline request is encapsulated within a Docker container and spun off, allowing for instant scalability. Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of performance and scalability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is good."

"Provides good security features."

"It has different type of interfaces that can integrate with companies."

"I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's likely an adapter for that."

"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."

"I would say that the most valuable feature is the array of connectors and integration tools."

"It has an efficient design flow."

"The solution is very fast-paced when it comes to making things right. We can quickly download what we need if we need any app migrations for our software business. We can download it plenty of times when we need to use it. It gives us very high speed for delivering any development."

More IBM App Connect pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is the CDC (Change Data Capture) component."

"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is its user-friendly graphical interface."

"The tool's middle-dimensional structure significantly simplifies obtaining the right data at the appropriate level. This feature makes deploying our applications easier since we utilize a single source without publishing data from various sources."

"We allow non-technical people to use Matillion to load data into our data warehouse for reporting. Thus, it is easy enough to use that we don't always have to get a technical person involved in setting up a data movement (ETL)."

"It is pretty user-friendly, even for people who aren't super technical."

"It has good integrations with Amazon Redshift and other AWS services."

"The simplicity of this tool is nice. It has a good graphical user interface. You can also do a lot of generic stuff in the tool. If there is good connectivity to a cloud database, such as Snowflake, and you can have a lot of Snowflake functionality in the tool."

"The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL."

More Matillion ETL pros

Cons

"One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient."

"It is not easy to deploy. It requires someone with a high level of knowledge in the solution to deploy it, not just anyone can do it."

"In the next release, I would like to get some quality connectors."

"The interface could be better."

"The installation of containers could be simplified, as it currently requires a senior-level installer."

"IBM needs to enhance and have a stronger offering for the event streaming part because this is the future needed for the containerization and the new integration requirement."

"The product should improve its support."

"IBM App Connect is scalable. From the administration side, they need to improve the RBAC model, as well as the clustering of this product. It will be good if we can start up the cluster, via IBM Connect Console. Some other products like MuleSoft, are providing this type of administration. MuleSoft is easy to use and user friendly."

More IBM App Connect cons

"One of the features that's in development is data privacy in the cloud, along with further SAP integration. For connectivity to SAP systems."

"The cost of the solution is high and could be reduced."

"I am looking forward to seeing the expansion of the source range for their data loader product."

"Ideally, I would like it to integrate with Secrets Manager as well as the AWS."

"In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases."

"Matillion ETL should include more enhanced capabilities for extracting data from the SAP systems."

"Performance can be improved for efficiency, and it can be made faster."

"Unlike Snowflake which automatically takes care of upgrading to the latest version and includes additional features, with Matillion ETL we need to do this ourselves."

More Matillion ETL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is very expensive if we want to scale."

"The price could be better."

"The cost depends upon the consumer."

"IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products."

"The licensing cost for IBM App Connect is very high."

"Initially, App Connect was quite expensive because the cost was based on the number of processors we used. However, it's now based on containers, which means we can be more specific about our consumption and get a better price."

"App Connect is not cheap."

"The solution's pricing isn't cheap, but you can get good discounts based on your competitive deal."

"The pricing depends on what edition the customer opts for. For example, the standard edition is priced at $2.00 per credit. And you are only charged when you use it. You're not charged when it's idle."

"The prices needs to be lower."

"It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."

"The product must improve its pricing."

"I think it is cost conscious. It used to be very cheap and they have more recently bumped up the pricing, so it is competitive now."

"It was very easy to purchase through the AWS Marketplace, but it was also expensive."

"The cost of the solution is high and could be reduced."

"Matillion ETL has a pay-as-you-go pricing model of a few dollars per hour of runtime."

More Matillion ETL pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

57%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

Our company has a big project for delivery and e-commerce sites. We use IBM App Connect to deliver information to our end users after they buy our products. We get information from many places, suc...

See all answers

What do you like most about Matillion ETL?

The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Matillion ETL?

The solution's pricing is not based on the licensing cost but on the running hours when the Matillion instance is up and running. Its pricing model is different from the traditional pricing models ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Matillion ETL?

Depending on the use case, the solution's pricing could be improved. Matillion ETL should include more enhanced capabilities for extracting data from the SAP systems.

See all answers

Comparisons

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 26% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 12% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 9% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM App Connect

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs Matillion ETL

Compared 13% of the time

SSIS vs Matillion ETL

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Glue vs Matillion ETL

Compared 9% of the time

Snowflake vs Matillion ETL

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Matillion ETL

Compared 7% of the time

More Matillion ETL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect

November 2024

Download IBM App Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Matillion ETL

November 2024

Download Matillion ETL product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery

Learn More

IBM

Matillion

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

Matillion ETL is a powerful tool for extracting, transforming, and loading large amounts of data from various sources into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake. Its ability to load data dynamically and efficiently using metadata is a standout feature, as is its open-source ETL with good performance and high efficiency.

The solution has a graphical interface for jobs, is easily adjustable and extensible, and allows for scheduling and error reporting. Matillion ETL has helped organizations move to a cloud-based solution, bridge the gap between on-premises and on-cloud, and perform complex migration projects.

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. Matillion ETL

October 2024

Free Report: IBM App Connect vs. Matillion ETL

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM App Connect vs. Matillion ETL and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM App Connect vs. Matillion ETL report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.