IBM App Connect vs SnapLogic comparison

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

1,611 Views
1,097 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

SnapLogic and IBM App Connect are competing in the data integration platform category. SnapLogic is often preferred for its competitive pricing and efficient customer support, whereas IBM App Connect stands out with a feature-rich ecosystem considered worth the investment.

Features: SnapLogic provides extensive pre-built connectors for various applications, robust data integration capabilities, and a highly flexible approach suited for diverse business needs. IBM App Connect offers advanced application integration, supports complex workflows, and allows seamless integration with IBM’s broader technology suite.

Room for Improvement: SnapLogic could enhance its capabilities by expanding its feature set to match that of enterprise-grade systems, improving security features, and offering more advanced automation options. IBM App Connect might improve by simplifying its interface, reducing the technical expertise required for deployment, and offering more competitive pricing options to appeal to smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic’s cloud-based deployment model simplifies installation and scaling, with intuitive tools that facilitate quick setup and excellent customer service. IBM App Connect offers both cloud and on-premises options, accommodating businesses with specific infrastructure needs, though its deployment process may require more technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SnapLogic presents a cost-effective subscription model providing good value, translating into strong ROI for cost-focused businesses. IBM App Connect, with higher upfront costs, is valued for its comprehensive features and enterprise-grade functionalities, with long-term ROI justified by its integration within the IBM ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM App Connect vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: March 2025).

IBM App Connect vs. SnapLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SnapLogic

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (21st), Process Automation (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM App Connect is 4.7%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 4.5%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mehdi El Filahi

Co-Founder at tenekit

Offers flexible adapters, good scalability but logging can be difficult at times

There is room for improvement in the logging messages. Sometimes, if you put someone new into App Connect, they can abandon it the same day. The logging is really painful. However, IBM has made efforts to integrate with Elasticsearch for logging, so that's an improvement. Overall, the logging can be difficult at times. One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient. Back in 2013, I worked with Sonic ESB, and even then, it had CI/CD with Maven. With App Connect, you need to build everything yourself when using tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, or CircleCI. IBM really needs to provide official support for this.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."

"The solution is very fast-paced when it comes to making things right. We can quickly download what we need if we need any app migrations for our software business. We can download it plenty of times when we need to use it. It gives us very high speed for delivering any development."

"When using IBM stacks, IBM App Connect is suitable and integrates well with other IBM products like WebSphere."

"The most valuable feature is the security."

"One of the most beneficial features is the ability to handle multiple communication technologies, like integrating Kafka flows, which is helpful as other teams heavily use it. Regarding error handling, I initially wrote most of the handling myself. While built-in features for error handling are built-in, it largely depends on the developer. We use a custom solution that catches all exceptions, logs them in a database, and replays them as needed. It has been effective for us for over twenty years."

"The most valuable feature is the user-friendliness of the application."

"App Connect's best feature is that it can be deployed in a container."

"Technical support is good."

More IBM App Connect pros

"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."

"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."

"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."

"I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL."

"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."

"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."

"The feature I found most valuable in SnapLogic is low-code development. Low-code development has been very useful for simple processes, which is required for business users such as extracting details from a file or getting things reported by calling your web service. Calling your web service also becomes easier with SnapLogic because of the snaps available, so if you have the documentation, you can call an API. You don't have to write all those clients to call an API, so that is another feature I found very easy in SnapLogic. Configuring and managing all the file systems also become very handy with the solution."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"It is not easy to deploy. It requires someone with a high level of knowledge in the solution to deploy it, not just anyone can do it."

"When we do a version upgrade of the system, the platform is kind of complicated."

"The installation of containers could be simplified, as it currently requires a senior-level installer."

"More connectors could be available for the product as some of the third-party software doesn't have default connectors."

"The user interface of IBM App Connect can be a little bit more user-friendly, I would say because the first-time developer is onboarded while using IBM App Connect, he or she may get a little intimidated or daunted looking at all the options available or the pipelines, et cetera."

"Updates are constantly delayed."

"I've been using IBM App Connect for about twenty-five years, and while I like it, there are some areas for improvement. The trace policy is ridiculous, and the biggest issue is the cost—it's expensive. People would use it much more if the price point weren't so high."

"Finding developers for the product is difficult since it is a niche solution. I know the OpenShift environment is running well for the microservice environment. We had some issues with the other environment we tried to implement. It can be easily implemented internally, but we have some problems in practice."

More IBM App Connect cons

"The support is the most important improvement they could make."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."

"If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy for new users to learn, it would be greatly beneficial."

"SnapLogic doesn't provide any on-premises software, so users have only cloud-based software to use."

"The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement."

"The biggest issue we have faced in our company with SnapLogic is regarding the EDI format"

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is very expensive if we want to scale."

"App Connect is not cheap."

"The price could be better."

"The solution's pricing isn't cheap, but you can get good discounts based on your competitive deal."

"The cost depends upon the consumer."

"The licensing cost for IBM App Connect is very high."

"Initially, App Connect was quite expensive because the cost was based on the number of processors we used. However, it's now based on containers, which means we can be more specific about our consumption and get a better price."

"IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"I used the free trial."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

54%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products.

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

Our company has a big project for delivery and e-commerce sites. We use IBM App Connect to deliver information to our end users after they buy our products. We get information from many places, suc...

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Comparisons

Compared 35% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 23% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 13% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Process Orchestration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 8% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

IBM App Connect

Download IBM App Connect product report

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

DataFlow

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

IBM

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

IBM App Connect vs. SnapLogic