IBM App Connect vs SnapLogic comparison

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

1,611 Views
1,097 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

SnapLogic and IBM App Connect are competing in the data integration platform category. SnapLogic is often preferred for its competitive pricing and efficient customer support, whereas IBM App Connect stands out with a feature-rich ecosystem considered worth the investment.

Features: SnapLogic provides extensive pre-built connectors for various applications, robust data integration capabilities, and a highly flexible approach suited for diverse business needs. IBM App Connect offers advanced application integration, supports complex workflows, and allows seamless integration with IBM’s broader technology suite.

Room for Improvement: SnapLogic could enhance its capabilities by expanding its feature set to match that of enterprise-grade systems, improving security features, and offering more advanced automation options. IBM App Connect might improve by simplifying its interface, reducing the technical expertise required for deployment, and offering more competitive pricing options to appeal to smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic’s cloud-based deployment model simplifies installation and scaling, with intuitive tools that facilitate quick setup and excellent customer service. IBM App Connect offers both cloud and on-premises options, accommodating businesses with specific infrastructure needs, though its deployment process may require more technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SnapLogic presents a cost-effective subscription model providing good value, translating into strong ROI for cost-focused businesses. IBM App Connect, with higher upfront costs, is valued for its comprehensive features and enterprise-grade functionalities, with long-term ROI justified by its integration within the IBM ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM App Connect vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: March 2025).

IBM App Connect vs. SnapLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SnapLogic

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (21st), Process Automation (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM App Connect is 4.7%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 4.5%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Mehdi El Filahi

Co-Founder at tenekit

Offers flexible adapters, good scalability but logging can be difficult at times

There is room for improvement in the logging messages. Sometimes, if you put someone new into App Connect, they can abandon it the same day. The logging is really painful. However, IBM has made efforts to integrate with Elasticsearch for logging, so that's an improvement. Overall, the logging can be difficult at times. One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient. Back in 2013, I worked with Sonic ESB, and even then, it had CI/CD with Maven. With App Connect, you need to build everything yourself when using tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, or CircleCI. IBM really needs to provide official support for this.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provides good security features."

"It's stable to use, connect with the cloud, and to deploy."

"It's a powerful application for collaboration. It has many features for customization and integration."

"The most valuable feature is the user-friendliness of the application."

"The solution is very fast-paced when it comes to making things right. We can quickly download what we need if we need any app migrations for our software business. We can download it plenty of times when we need to use it. It gives us very high speed for delivering any development."

"When using IBM stacks, IBM App Connect is suitable and integrates well with other IBM products like WebSphere."

"We use IBM App Connect for the integration between the applications."

"There is a friendly interface for configuration, and integration is made easy."

More IBM App Connect pros

"The API architecture makes it easy for orchestration."

"I find the reusability and the snaps to be very valuable features."

"Overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"I found SnapLogic valuable and what I found most valuable about it was its ETL feature. I also found its automation feature valuable. It can be used for automating manual activities. It can be used as a middleware for certain transactional data processing and minimal datasets and ETL activities."

"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."

"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"The installation of containers could be simplified, as it currently requires a senior-level installer."

"More connectors could be available for the product as some of the third-party software doesn't have default connectors."

"The product should improve its support."

"The setup time for App Connect could be improved."

"I've been using IBM App Connect for about twenty-five years, and while I like it, there are some areas for improvement. The trace policy is ridiculous, and the biggest issue is the cost—it's expensive. People would use it much more if the price point weren't so high."

"One more important point is that if IBM improves its CI/CD capabilities, it will make a big difference. Right now, I have to create my own CI/CD setup from scratch for every client, which is inefficient."

"They reply in one or two hours at most, but they could be better."

"The addition of string functionality would be a benefit, particularly in the ESQL space that IBM already uses internally."

More IBM App Connect cons

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."

"The support is the most important improvement they could make."

"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."

"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Initially, App Connect was quite expensive because the cost was based on the number of processors we used. However, it's now based on containers, which means we can be more specific about our consumption and get a better price."

"The licensing cost for IBM App Connect is very high."

"IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products."

"The price could be better."

"App Connect is not cheap."

"It is very expensive if we want to scale."

"The cost depends upon the consumer."

"The solution's pricing isn't cheap, but you can get good discounts based on your competitive deal."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"I used the free trial."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"The pricing is okay."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

54%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products.

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

Our company has a big project for delivery and e-commerce sites. We use IBM App Connect to deliver information to our end users after they buy our products. We get information from many places, suc...

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Comparisons

Compared 35% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 23% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 13% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Process Orchestration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 8% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

IBM App Connect

Download IBM App Connect product report

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

DataFlow

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

IBM

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

IBM App Connect vs. SnapLogic