IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Postman comparison

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 60 Postman reviews

794 Views
595 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Postman and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are competing products designed to enhance API development and integration capabilities. Postman is notable for its attractive pricing and strong support, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers superior features that justify its higher cost.

Features: Postman is robust in API testing, collaboration, and simulation capabilities, making it a comprehensive platform for API lifecycle management. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration provides advanced integration tools such as messaging, event streaming, and high-level security, suitable for enterprise-level deployment.

Room for Improvement: Postman can improve on providing more advanced integration tools and increased scalability for enterprise needs. Enhancing security features and expanding platform capabilities would be beneficial. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration could work on simplifying its initial setup process and making its user interface more intuitive. Reducing complexity and improving affordability might appeal to smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman is recognized for its rapid setup and user-friendly interface, making it accessible with minimal configuration needed. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration involves a more complex setup but is supported by extensive customer service, helping smooth the integration process within existing infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Postman is a cost-effective solution with low initial setup costs, offering good ROI for small to medium-sized projects. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration has a higher setup cost but provides significant ROI through its enterprise-grade functionalities, making it suitable for large-scale and complex projects.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Postman Report (Updated: March 2025).

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Postman

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th)

Postman

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Anagha Mahadik

Product Development Manager at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees

Solution simplifies web service testing with impressive speed and accessibility

It is very easy for me to use and I highly prefer it compared to SoapUI and other products for performing its job. It is more handy and faster. It has impacted us very nicely. Postman is used for free by us. I'm not sure if there might be a paid version for multiple users. It is a very good product used for development. It is easy to install, as well as to learn, particularly for new users, even if they are not developers. I taught my business analyst to use it. I just showed them once, and it was easy for them to understand. For example, I gave them the URL and request format and asked them to test independently. They were able to use it on their own and do their testing as well. It was a good experience, especially for generally smart people, like those we usually hire in our company. It is pretty easy to explain, and learning it is not complex.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a very stable solution."

"The scalability is good."

"It is simple, easy to use and a good tool."

"In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results."

"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and user-friendly."

"I rate Postman as a ten out of ten."

"With Postman you can do automation. Automation has increased efficiency by more than 30% or 40%. Because the speed has increased, it's also possible for us to do in-sprint automation testing."

"The environment variables are a valuable feature because I can easily switch them and see all the developments in different cycles and stages."

Cons

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"I would like to see advanced automation in reference to Postman."

"The solution is quite complex partly because the UI needs simplification."

"Initially, the setup is a little bit complex. Whenever a user comes to Postman for the first time, it is just a bit complex since they do not know where to start and what is the structure."

"Postman does not have a check-in balance. Essentially what I mean by that is if there is something that is already configured on a particular device, it just overrides it without checking whether you really want to override it or not."

"If we have a certain build on one machine it won't work with another build even if we are using the same URL. It would give us a connection refuse. So developing environment compatibility would make it better."

"There needs to be more flexibility surrounding the testing of SOAP APIs."

"We'd like to see some better UI in newer versions."

"Postman needs more advanced data-driven testing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

"I am using the free option."

"The solution has moderate pricing."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"We are using its free version."

"I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."

"Postman is an open-source product. It is free to download from Google."

"Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."

"It is free."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

What do you like most about Postman?

The product is easy to implement.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?

Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Comparisons

Compared 45% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 15% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

ReadyAPI Test vs Postman

Compared 24% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Postman

Compared 16% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Postman

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Postman

Compared 14% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman

Compared 7% of the time

Product Reports

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

API Management

April 2025

Download Postman product report

March 2025

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation

PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera