Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM DevOps Test UI vs Ranorex Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Ranorex enhances productivity, saves time and costs, automates testing, and improves efficiency with positive feedback on flexibility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM DevOps Test UI users praise effective technical support for responsive, timely solutions, benefiting from consistent global partnership assistance.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM DevOps Test UI is scalable for multiple users but needs better mobile support despite being effective for functional testing.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
IBM DevOps Test UI is stable with minor memory issues and potential concerns over future mobile support.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

IBM DevOps Test UI needs improved reporting, integration, compatibility, efficiency, and accessibility for better user experience.
 

Setup Cost

IBM DevOps Test UI offers competitive licensing, ranging $10,000-$30,000, covering support and multiple projects per user-license.
Ranorex Studio is seen as costly yet justified, offering flexible licensing with negotiable prices and customizable user fees.
 

Valuable Features

IBM DevOps Test UI enables efficient test automation with robust features and integrates with various technologies and management tools.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
28th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
15th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ranorex Studio
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
16th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.6%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.8%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

HZ
Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support
The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.
Aws V - PeerSpot reviewer
Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?
Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?
I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.
What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding languag...
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edumate
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.