Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM FlashSystem vs INFINIDAT InfiniBox comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM FlashSystem
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
NAS (4th), Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (3rd), All-Flash Storage (6th)
INFINIDAT InfiniBox
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise SAN (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Storage Solutions solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM FlashSystem is designed for NAS and holds a mindshare of 7.3%, up 7.4% compared to last year.
INFINIDAT InfiniBox, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise SAN, holds 2.7% mindshare, up 2.2% since last year.
NAS
Enterprise SAN
 

Featured Reviews

Abdul-Salam - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 3, 2023
An easy GUI and simple provisioning but our model does not support compression
Our company uses the solution for robotic process automation, workflow automation, and document management.  The solution is used for certain front-end systems, so users are not aware of the how it operates on the backend. About 30 front-end users access each application across various bank…
GM
Jan 4, 2022
Good performance, suitable for big data, but the response time could be improved
The primary use case for this product is high-performance storage This product has good performance. It is similar to the Dell PowerMax and Pure Storage FlashArray. The InfiniBox has three active controllers. The response time for read requests can be improved. It is not as good as the solution…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is that it's very easy to use and configure. It used to be more difficult, but now it's almost flawless."
"The ability to create LUNs and modify them are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The solution allows for easy migrations from previous products or vendors via its embedded storage virtualization function."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the deduplication, because the nature of the data that we are using in our current environment, has a lot of replicated data."
"It's very easy to manage."
"This solution is very stable."
"The most valuable features are flexibility and performance."
"The installation is nice and easy."
"Mostly, their support is also great at reacting to issues but moreover, proactive to prevent issues."
"This product has good performance."
 

Cons

"The generic functionality of IBM FlashSystem, IBM always dismisses using file share or sharing protocols inside their storage hardware, and they only focus on the block-level storage."
"I know they have a flashcopy manager, but it is extra software, an additional license, and some customers don't like to add addition costs to their infrastructure. If IBM could create, or include snapshot management within the GUI, that would really be helpful."
"They don't offer subscription-based payments."
"The solution is not easy to implement. It takes a lot of time to study the product and it's a little complicated in general."
"If you want to expand, you cannot expand the disc enclosure. You have to buy a total individual node. Sometimes, this is difficult because we are just looking for capacity and not a node."
"The solution's infrastructure technology level could be PCI Express 5 instead of PCI Express 4 for the next version."
"I think the only thing the developers can look at, is that it is limited to 25 gigabytes currently. In the next release they might want to increase that."
"Sometimes the performance is effective but it gets resolved in the process."
"The response time for read requests can be improved."
"InfiniBox, right now, offers only asynchronous replication between two storages."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If five is a good price and one is a high price, I would rate the price a two or three out of five."
"Our customers would like IMB FlashSystem to be less expensive."
"My customers got the IBM FlashSystem bundle offer. It was a one-time purchase for three years of service. The price would depend on the storage size and could reach between $25,000 to $55,000."
"The tool is cost-efficient."
"The price depends of the technology that our customers need. The price can come at a lower cost but this may increase as storage is added."
"The pricing may be a bit higher than other brands. If you compare the IBM FlashSystems in midrange with Dell EMC in midrange, IBM costs a bit more, but I prefer IBM because it has more specs that I can benefit from."
"I find the pricing of the solution to be very reasonable."
"Overall the price of the solution is expensive and this includes the license."
"The license covers any feature and also, the future features are already included. It is as easy as a 1, 2 and 3."
"The best features come included without any additional cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
47%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

 

Also Known As

IBM Storwize
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH
TriCore Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, IBM and others in NAS. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.