We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"Maximo is very stable. We really do not have problem with stability."
"Provides great flexibility."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pros →
"IBM Maximo can improve the financial support and financial application, to make it more similar to an ERP as opposed to an EAM. Overall they can improve the financial processes."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"Maximo is a big system, so the initial setup is complex."
"The initial setup was complex, because it is a complex product."
"You can get lost using the application"
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Cons →
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Corrigo Enterprise, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with . See our IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.