Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Maximo vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Billing Software (2nd)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne As...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo is 26.9%, up from 25.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is 2.8%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Jose Pedro Muñoz - PeerSpot reviewer
A very strong and powerful tool in the market preferred by a variety of industries
I rate the technical support a seven out of ten. Three levels of support in IBM. The first one is a fixed level, while levels two and three are very good. Here, level one is not very good, as it takes time to go from level one to level two and from level two to level three. So, level one is of low capacity.
IanCampbell - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides simple module navigation
The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is the ability to navigate through the module The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would. I have been using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."
"Has a powerful audit combination that helps achieve high accuracy."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."
"​Maximo is very stable. We really do not have problem with stability.​"
"Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
 

Cons

"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"Could use some alignment regarding some standards and the tracking of the IT assets. Even though they have all of the information (i.e. where are the assets, who owns the asset, etc.), they were not mapping it to different cyber standards."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."
"$USD700 per agent user."
"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."
"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
"Explore the possibility of using DB2. You will avoid the cost of SQL Server or Oracle licenses."
"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"The product is not expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
36%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Maximo?
It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world.
What needs improvement with IBM Maximo?
Though I liked it a lot, I think it was lagging a lot. It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning. The aforementioned...
What is your primary use case for IBM Maximo?
It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world. With IBM Maximo,...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management?
I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Maximo
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.