No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Salesforce Quote-to-Cash comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Maximo Application Suite
Ranking in Billing Software
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (1st)
Salesforce Quote-to-Cash
Ranking in Billing Software
8th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Billing Software category, the mindshare of IBM Maximo Application Suite is 2.5%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Salesforce Quote-to-Cash is 2.5%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Billing Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Maximo Application Suite2.5%
Salesforce Quote-to-Cash2.5%
Other95.0%
Billing Software
 

Featured Reviews

Antony Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Java Software Engineer at GPA
Asset management has become streamlined and decision-making is now driven by lifecycle data
The best features IBM Maximo offers are that it is very simple to deploy on OpenShift using Ansible playbooks. It also has excellent support for integration, is simple to configure, and the asset register is very straightforward. Work management and managing inventory are seamless. In terms of integration support, I have used preventive maintenance, work generation, accurate work execution planning, tracking actuals, and I can easily integrate with other tools and systems. IBM Maximo Suite gives me a single place where service cycles are standardized and tied to compliance. IBM Maximo has positively impacted my organization as it has been a very useful tool. It reduced human error by moving away from pen and paper-based scheduling. It saved cost by minimizing unexpected downtime of assets, with approximately 50% of time being saved. We have also reduced overwork among staff by removing redundant information and smoothing task flows. It helps us scale our team without micromanaging small issues.
reviewer1873569 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer 2 at a security firm with 10,001+ employees
Solution for quoting customers, but could be faster
We use this solution internally mostly for quoting for customers. There are over 10,000 employees in my organization.  There are other modules that we use to do everything, like SteelBrick, but the UI is clunky. It could be the way the solution was implemented. The solution is a little bit slow…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For some clients we have up to 89% downtime reduction of equipment that generates over 1.2 million euro growth in revenue because we don't spend that much money on downtime and repair costs."
"Even if we do not look at the full software and we look at smaller use cases within the software, the ROI is often quite substantial."
"​Maximo is very stable. We really do not have problem with stability.​"
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"This is the Cadillac of asset management applications."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system."
"If it's not the best EAM product, it is one of the best out there."
"The stability is pretty solid."
 

Cons

"Many improvements are needed in the customer support service department because of delays in response, which are very costly."
"This solution could improve by integrating or embedding finances, charts of accounts, and invoicing."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not."
"One way IBM Maximo can be improved is that the interface is not modern or particularly user-friendly."
"IBM is a big company and they have a lot of products. Level One, the first level of tech support, is the one that is used to stop the tsunami. For everyone, it's always work to get past that."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"From that perspective, the UI is quite old-fashioned, and that would be one of my main concerns."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"The solution is a little bit slow sometimes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the pricing a nine. The price is very high."
"​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
"You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."
"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."
"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Billing Software solutions are best for your needs.
909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Government
9%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise22
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Maximo?
There are a couple of places, but I cannot name one at this moment because I still need to go through more of the things because there is a lot which I need to learn. Something related to the custo...
What is your primary use case for IBM Maximo?
I generally develop IBM Maximo reports and then some automation scripts, and the major thing which I have customized is an application called Archival solution that we created from scratch. For the...
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Maximo?
AI Watson, I have not used it so far. I was trying to use it, but there are some challenges for me to use it. I will definitely try to give a review once I use it. I have not used it so far. I will...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Maximo
SteelBrick Billing, Salesforce QTC
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Birst, Bluecat, Cloudera, Deltek, Touring, Mitsubishi Electric, Mulesoft, Telus
Find out what your peers are saying about Zuora, Sage, Intuit and others in Billing Software. Updated: July 2026.
909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.