Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.1
Panaya Test Dynamix is praised for scalability, efficient test case management, integration, reliability, and performance under large workloads.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.8
Panaya Test Dynamix requires better customization, clearer error messages, improved performance, enhanced integration, easier navigation, and more comprehensive training resources.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix for its automation, detailed reporting, ease of use, seamless integration, and efficient defect management.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
Panaya Test Dynamix stands out for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, excelling under heavy workflows and various conditions.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix customer service for prompt, knowledgeable, and efficient support with effective communication and problem-solving skills.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive, scalable, and cost-effective pricing with customizable packages to meet diverse organizational testing needs.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational ClearQuest
Ranking in Defect Tracking
1st
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (7th)
Panaya Test Dynamix
Ranking in Defect Tracking
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (22nd), Test Management Tools (12th), Regression Testing Tools (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Defect Tracking category, the mindshare of IBM Rational ClearQuest is 37.5%, up from 31.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 37.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Defect Tracking
 

Featured Reviews

it_user541326 - PeerSpot reviewer
Tracks change requests, problems, and physical asset management. I would like to see data type for floating point numbers.
Customer Service: Customer service has been adequate. Most of the times we've had any issues IBM has been able to provide a solution. We've dealt mostly with customer service representatives in Brazil. Technical Support: Technical support from IBM is pretty good since you can create a PMR with them and they’re very responsible.
Alain Vanhaeght - PeerSpot reviewer
More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Defect Tracking solutions are best for your needs.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
25%
Government
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?
The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.
What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and s...
What is your primary use case for Panaya Test Dynamix?
Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people do...
 

Also Known As

Rational ClearQuest
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShield
Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Panaya Test Dynamix and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.