IBM Security QRadar and SentinelOne Singularity Complete compete in the realm of security information and event management (SIEM) and endpoint protection. SentinelOne appears to have an advantage in endpoint security due to its advanced machine learning and threat remediation capabilities.
Features: IBM Security QRadar offers features like ease of data extraction from logs, scalability through simple appliance linking, and automatic log source identification. It also provides comprehensive built-in rules for efficient data consolidation and compliance monitoring. SentinelOne Singularity Complete emphasizes endpoint protection with machine learning, autonomous threat detection, and rollback capabilities, offering seamless integration with third-party tools for real-time use.
Room for Improvement: IBM Security QRadar could improve its incident management with better restrictions and readability. Users have faced issues with Java versions, integration limitations, and a complex setup. SentinelOne Singularity Complete could enhance its alert management and integrate more features for easier reporting and policy management. It should focus on better interoperability with security operations and management controls.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security QRadar is mainly on-premises and has mixed reviews regarding deployment ease, though its customer support is generally good but sometimes slow. SentinelOne Singularity Complete supports cloud and hybrid deployments, praised for simplicity and high customer satisfaction, with quick and effective support interactions.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Security QRadar is expensive but offers comprehensive features for large enterprises, providing good value for enhanced security capabilities, though it may be high for smaller businesses. SentinelOne Singularity Complete, while also costly, delivers competitive endpoint protection, recognized for efficient threat remediation and reduced downtime, offering substantial ROI.
With SOAR, the workflow takes one minute or less to complete the analysis.
Investing this amount was very much worth it for my organization.
Since then, I have not faced any intrusions, which is one reason I chose SentinelOne over ESET.
We have not faced any attacks since we implemented it.
It has absolutely helped reduce our organizational risk.
They assist with advanced issues, such as hardware or other problems, that are not part of standard operations.
Support needs to understand the issue first, then escalate it to the engineering team.
The support is really good; for instance, if a critical ticket is submitted, you will get paged right away as it gets logged, and their analyst will look into it, letting you know as soon as possible so you can work on it.
They do a great job of figuring out the problem and pointing you to generic documentation or working with you to fine-tune a solution.
We are using the automated email process for support, and they respond within an hour or two hours sometimes.
A chat service would be beneficial.
For EPS license, if you increase or exceed the EPS license, you cannot receive events.
It's all auto-scale and auto-categorized, configuring automatically.
The tool's built-in automation for deploying the agents works well for large infrastructures like mine.
My deployment is relatively small, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete works within those constraints.
I think QRadar is stable and currently satisfies my needs.
The product has been stable so far.
It has caused problems with interoperability between third-party tools, which could lead to entire servers crashing or specific tools failing.
This indicates room for improvement in stability when interacting with other solutions.
Initially, there were issues, particularly on the management side, but now the console is much more stable.
We receive logs from different types of devices and need a way to correlate them effectively.
If AI-related support can suggest rules and integrate with existing security devices like MD, IPS, this SIM can create more relevant rules.
IBM Security QRadar does not support Canvas, so we had to create custom scripts and workarounds to pull logs from Canvas.
The only thing that prevented the attack from succeeding was a free version of Malwarebytes.
Providing a single pane of visibility for the end user would be beneficial.
It's challenging to prevent a user from manipulating their privileges or someone else's of others, and it's difficult to control what users can access at the organizational level.
Splunk is more expensive than IBM Security QRadar.
It was costly mainly because of the value you can get right now compared to other solutions.
If you want protection, you have to pay the price.
There are other products that are less expensive, but I tell my clients that in security, they cannot cut corners or look for the cheapest solution.
Reputation and quality are important, but especially in today’s economy, price is a significant factor.
Recently, I faced an incident, a cyber incident, and it was detected in real time.
IBM is seeking information about IBM QRadar because a part of QRadar, especially in the cloud, has been sold to Palo Alto.
We have FortiSOAR and IBM Resilient for IBM Security QRadar orchestration.
I have an advanced app providing visibility of all my endpoints, which was not the case before.
SentinelOne has a feature to decommission automatically, which has been fantastic.
There's also automation that gives my team free time, preventing them from having to look for every alert.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
SentinelOne Singularity Complete | 5.7% |
IBM Security QRadar | 1.4% |
Other | 92.9% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 89 |
Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
Large Enterprise | 102 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 82 |
Midsize Enterprise | 45 |
Large Enterprise | 75 |
IBM Security QRadar (recently acquired by Palo Alto Networks) is a security and analytics platform designed to defend against threats and scale security operations. This is done through integrated visibility, investigation, detection, and response. QRadar empowers security groups with actionable insights into high-priority threats by providing visibility into enterprise security data. Through centralized visibility, security teams and analysts can determine their security stance, which areas pose a potential threat, and which areas are critical. This will help streamline workflows by eliminating the need to pivot between tools.
IBM Security QRadar is built to address a wide range of security issues and can be easily scaled with minimal customization effort required. As data is ingested, QRadar administers automated, real-time security intelligence to swiftly and precisely discover and prioritize threats. The platform will issue alerts with actionable, rich context into developing threats. Security teams and analysts can then rapidly respond to minimize the attackers' strike. The solution will provide a complete view of activity in both cloud-based and on-premise environments as a large amount of data is ingested throughout the enterprise. Additionally, QRadar’s anomaly detection intelligence enables security teams to identify any user behavior changes that could be indicators of potential threats.
IBM QRadar Log Manager
To better help organizations protect themselves against potential security threats, attacks, and breaches, IBM QRadar Log Manager gathers, analyzes, preserves, and reports on security log events using QRadar Sense Analytics. All operating systems and applications, servers, devices, and applications are converted into searchable and actionable intelligent data. QRadar Log Manager then helps organizations meet compliance reporting and monitoring requirements, which can be further upgraded to QRadar SIEM for a more superior level of threat protection.
Some of QRadar Log Manager’s key features include:
Reviews from Real Users
IBM Security QRadar is a solution of choice among users because it provides a complete solution for security teams by integrating network analysis, log management, user behavior analytics, threat intelligence, and AI-powered investigations into a single solution. Users particularly like having a single window into their network and its ability to be used for larger enterprises.
Simon T., a cyber security services operations manager at an aerospace/defense firm, notes, "The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis."
A management executive at a security firm says, "What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."
SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides AI-driven threat detection and response with features like ransomware protection and rollback, offering endpoint protection with minimal system impact and deep forensic analysis.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete combines machine learning and artificial intelligence to offer robust endpoint protection. It delivers real-time insights and advanced threat detection through seamless integration with third-party tools, allowing for efficient endpoint management. With an emphasis on user-friendliness, it ensures reduced false positives. Room for improvement includes better integration options, enhanced reporting, and more precise analytics to tackle false positives. Users seek improved interoperability with systems and comprehensive support for legacy systems.
What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete?Organizations from industries like finance, healthcare, and technology deploy SentinelOne Singularity Complete to safeguard endpoints such as PCs, servers, and virtual machines. Equipped with EDR, it effectively replaces traditional antivirus systems and integrates with cloud technology for real-time security insights.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.