IBM Security Verify Access vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance comparison

IBM and Microsoft are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. IBM is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.4. IBM holds a 1.7% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 7 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

706 Views
476 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Read 8 Microsoft Entra ID Governance reviews

359 Views
179 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

IBM Security Verify Access and Microsoft Entra ID Governance are two noteworthy products in the identity and access management category, each offering unique advantages. Microsoft Entra ID Governance tends to have the upper hand due to its robust feature set, despite IBM Security Verify Access's edge in pricing and support.

Features: IBM Security Verify Access offers comprehensive user authentication and authorization capabilities, integration with enterprise systems, and robust threat detection. Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides dynamic role-based access control, seamless Microsoft services integration, and advanced auditing features.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Verify Access could enhance its dynamic access control features, integration with non-enterprise solutions, and improve its auditing capabilities. Microsoft Entra ID Governance may improve pricing flexibility, expand its integration with non-Microsoft ecosystems, and enhance its user-centric threat management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Verify Access offers versatile on-premise and cloud deployment options with strong customer support, ensuring smooth implementation. Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides cloud-first deployment with easy integration into Microsoft ecosystems and efficient customer support for a user-friendly experience.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Verify Access focuses on delivering solid ROI through competitive pricing and customizable features. Microsoft Entra ID Governance, while priced higher, justifies its cost with extensive functionalities and integration benefits, leading to significant long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Verify Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th), Identity Management (IM) (25th), Access Management (13th)

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is 1.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

AsifIqbal

Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has good scalability and is stable with no glitches; has a multi-factor authentication feature

What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain.

Read full review

William Kox

Azure Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Great policies and timelines for streamlined compliance

There are some areas where improvements are necessary. Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs. I cannot directly perform some tasks from the portal. First, I have to go to the policy, change it, and then return to the package to add it. I cannot do it directly from the package. Workarounds are needed, so that can be improved. At the moment, that is the only issue we are facing that needs enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"Access reviews are an essential feature of Entra Governance. Additionally, privileged identity management is one of its most valuable features. Just-in-time access, or Jet GIT, is integral to this system. Moreover, user behavior analytics stands out as one of its top features."

"It is compliant with our RVRT and CSV guidelines."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews."

"The solution gives me the capability to automatically move guest accounts from the tenant without any manual intervention."

"The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities."

"I am very happy with the solution."

"The platform's most valuable feature is the single sign-on service."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance for identity management is multi-factor authentication."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance pros

Cons

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"The solution lacks the feature to work well with third-party applications."

"The platform's configuration process needs improvement."

"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies."

"Even though we have almost the full package, there are some bugs."

"The product's workflow approval process needs improvement."

"Microsoft has done a commendable job with RPAX. However, Microsoft should prioritize enhancing its ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) capabilities. Currently, Microsoft's ABAC offering falls behind AWS in comparison."

"Bridging between on-premises and cloud services has the potential for improvement. For instance, it would be beneficial to be able to synchronize traditional directory schemas with Azure. I need to maintain an on-premises Active Directory server for certain required services."

"Microsoft Entra ID Governance should improve its capability to manage identities and access from a single console."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"The solution's pricing is not low but reasonable."

"In the education sector where I work, the annual cost for my Google and Microsoft environments is approximately $35,000. This covers the needs of 3,400 students and 800 faculty and staff members."

"While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."

"There are no additional costs besides the standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Insurance Company

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

We use it throughout the company. My colleagues and I are utilizing it, and we are creating access packages and so forth. We are using it for the entire company to manage access.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 23% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 10% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

ForgeRock vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 75% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 16% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 10% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

April 2025

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

March 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID Governance product report

Also Known As

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

No data available

Overview

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

Microsoft Entra ID Governance empowers organizations with advanced identity management, security enforcement, and seamless access management across environments, offering robust multi-factor authentication and audit capabilities.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides comprehensive identity and security management through features like single sign-on and privileged identity management. It enhances user management with user behavior analytics, entitlement management, and access reviews while integrating on-premises solutions with cloud services like Office 365. By ensuring secure access and resource protection within Azure, organizations manage access, automate user access rules, and govern external identities effectively.

What features make Microsoft Entra ID Governance stand out?

Audit Trail Capabilities: Thorough tracking for security compliance.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhanced protection across platforms.
Single Sign-On: Efficient management across different systems.
Privileged Identity Management: Control just-in-time access with analytics.
Entitlement Management: Automate guest account management.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Enhanced Security: Strong authentication and auditing for secure environments.
Efficient User Management: Streamlined access processes through SSO.
Unified Identity Solutions: Integration with cloud and on-premises platforms.
Automated Access Rules: Reduced manual oversight with automation.

Financial services utilize Microsoft Entra ID Governance to protect sensitive data while automating user access rules and managing compliance. In education, it facilitates user account management and access provisioning for students and faculty, ensuring secure collaboration through Exchange and Teams.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

POST Luxembourg

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

March 2025

Free Report: IBM Security Verify Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Verify Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Security Verify Access vs. Microsoft Entra ID Governance report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.