IBM SoftLayer and Microsoft Azure File Storage are leading cloud storage solutions with distinct strengths. Microsoft Azure File Storage seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities.
Features: IBM SoftLayer is known for secure data storage options, high performance, and cost-effectiveness. Microsoft Azure File Storage offers seamless integration with Microsoft services, scalability, and advanced security features.
Room for Improvement: IBM SoftLayer needs enhanced documentation, better API, and improved user interface. Microsoft Azure File Storage could benefit from better performance during peak usage, more transparent pricing models, and additional technical support resources.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SoftLayer provides straightforward setup but requires more extensive support resources. Microsoft Azure File Storage receives positive feedback for smooth deployment and responsive support team.
Pricing and ROI: IBM SoftLayer is considered more cost-effective with a quick ROI. Microsoft Azure File Storage, though pricier, is viewed as offering good value due to its extensive features.
SoftLayer provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. Our customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.
Products and services include bare metal and virtual servers, networking, turnkey big data solutions, private cloud solutions, and more. Our unique advantages include the industry's first Network-Within-a-Network topology for true out-of-band access, and an easy-to-use customer portal and robust API for full remote-access of all product and service management options.
Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol
Key scenarios:
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.