IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus comparison

IBM and TIBCO are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while TIBCO is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. IBM holds a 3.9% mindshare in E, compared to TIBCO’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Read 13 IBM WebSphere Message Broker reviews

934 Views
773 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Read 12 TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus reviews

818 Views
555 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

IBM WebSphere Message Broker and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus compete in the middleware and service integration category. Initial comparisons suggest IBM maintains an edge in pricing and support, whereas TIBCO offers superior features that justify its higher cost.

Features: IBM WebSphere Message Broker offers strong message routing, advanced translation, and reliable integration across multiple protocols. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides exceptional scalability, extensive connectivity, and effective management tools. Its rich feature set is advantageous for complex integrations and demanding environments.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere could benefit from enhanced scalability and connectivity options. Its management tools might need further refinement in complex deployments. TIBCO could improve its pricing structure and reduce learning curve for new users. Enhancements in customer training materials would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere Message Broker features a robust deployment model supplemented by extensive documentation and support. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, while similarly robust, provides more scalability flexibility, with active support contributing to favorable deployment experiences.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere is noted for cost-effective setups and lower licensing fees, promising a faster ROI for simpler needs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix, despite its higher initial costs, delivers a long-term ROI with its extended capabilities fitting for enterprises requiring scalable integration solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (16th)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 3.9%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

BrajendraKumar

Technical Architect at HCL Technologies

Offers large-sized business information processing with a time-saving setup and impressive stability

I primarily use two previews of the product for Dev and two for QA as part of the production process. Whatever tools our company is using, the cost of a license in IBM WebSphere Message Broker is about 80% of all these software or tools. The message routing capabilities satisfy workflow efficiency. The product supports message formats of XML, JSON, and SSID, which are around 24 KB to 50 KB in size. The solution supports communication protocols like STTP and TCP. Features like DataGraph need to be introduced in IBM WebSphere Message Broker. Some of the clients of our organization are using an outdated version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker for which the vendor doesn't provide direct support anymore. For the aforementioned version, our company professionals can solve the queries on their own without seeking support from IBM. During the installation of a prior version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker, sometimes I have to configure the failovers through the cluster, where issues arise, and I often seek help from the support team. The solution is being used by some medicine companies in our organization that receive sales orders from the EDR or JDE. I would not recommend the product to others as its becoming obsolete and they can rather choose a middleware solution from Amazon or Azure. But I would overall rate the product a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Mustofa Yonus

Cheif Specialist- Licensing Systems at Roads & Transport Authority

A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six to seven out of ten. My company consists of around 7000 employees, and we use the solution as an integrated service in around 300 to 400 systems, both internally and externally, making it a huge number. Our company uses the solution every minute and every second, and we can't function without it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format."

"Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."

"It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy."

"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."

"The documentation, performance, stability and scalability of the tool are valuable."

"Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ."

"The transactions and message queuing are the most valuable features of the solution."

"IBM WebSphere Message Broker is one of the best middleware solutions"

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros

"The stability of this solution is excellent."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring, ease of use, and easy to understand development GUI."

"It's very stable and reliable."

"It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based."

"The product’s most valuable feature is stability."

"The technology is really easy to learn."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus pros

Cons

"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."

"The product's features are not being upgraded or enhanced by the vendor"

"I know that Message Broker was a very tightly copied product with another IBM product, that is, IBM MQ. I would like to have a little bit more decoupling from the IBM MQ because it should not be a prerequisite for IBM WebSphere Message Broker usage."

"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is."

"The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight."

"Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved."

"Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker cons

"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."

"The intermediate version that we are using has stability issues. These stability issues should be resolved, but it seems like TIBCO is not focusing on resolving these issues. The resolution timelines are quite high even for high-priority incidents. Its price should be lower. Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable."

"Our version does not have cloud capabilities."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally."

"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager."

"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"

"This product is more expensive than competing products."

"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."

"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."

"IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time."

"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."

"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."

"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."

"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."

"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

There could be greater flexibility and agility in service creation for the product. As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordi...

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors. The...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 46% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 21% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 13% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 13% of the time

IBM BPM vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 55% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 24% of the time

Mule ESB vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 21% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

April 2025

Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

March 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus product report

Also Known As

WebSphere Message Broker

ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Overview

WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

IBM

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire

Colonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

April 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.