IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker comparison

IBM DataPower Gateway vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Download the complete report

Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DataPower Gateway

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

5th

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SOA Application Gateways (1st), API Management (10th)

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

9th

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of IBM DataPower Gateway is 4.8%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 5.0%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM DataPower Gateway	4.8%
IBM WebSphere Message Broker	5.0%
Other	90.2%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

AkshaySawant

Manager at CSB Bank Ltd

Security features excel but development limitations emerge

We are using the IBM DataPower Gateway for security purposes. As per the development perspective, there are some limitations with IBM DataPower Gateway because it only supports XML and XSLT language, but it does not support the Java language. This is the only limitation of the IBM DataPower Gateway. For the authentication and authorization purpose, we can use the IBM DataPower Gateway. It's a very good product. We are mostly using the IBM DataPower Gateway for security purposes and load balancing purposes. If we are handling the load for a particular server, then we can use the IBM DataPower Gateway. The IBM DataPower Gateway is mostly used for security purposes. If we have some APIs and we are using some security for those APIs, then we can use it. It can also be used as a load balancer. It's also used for certificate management, user management purposes, authentication, and authorization. For routing, the IBM DataPower Gateway has multiple URL-based routing and content-based routing capabilities. If we have multiple URLs, then we can use an XML script. Using the XSLT language, we can configure multiple URLs and implement URL-based routing. Content-based routing means if we have multiple requests, we can route the request to a particular URL. For this, we need to use the XSLT language only. We can't use XML, Java, or other scripting languages. With IBM DataPower Gateway, we are using all the APIs. All APIs have been configured on the gateway. We have configured the particular TLS profile and some TLS client profiles as well. Using that TLS profile, we have configured the APIs and authentication. We have configured some tokens also, including JWT tokens and different types of auth tokens. There is also a rate limiting feature which we use for handling API loads.

Read full review

BrajendraKumar

Technical Architect at HCL Technologies

Offers large-sized business information processing with a time-saving setup and impressive stability

I primarily use two previews of the product for Dev and two for QA as part of the production process. Whatever tools our company is using, the cost of a license in IBM WebSphere Message Broker is about 80% of all these software or tools. The message routing capabilities satisfy workflow efficiency. The product supports message formats of XML, JSON, and SSID, which are around 24 KB to 50 KB in size. The solution supports communication protocols like STTP and TCP. Features like DataGraph need to be introduced in IBM WebSphere Message Broker. Some of the clients of our organization are using an outdated version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker for which the vendor doesn't provide direct support anymore. For the aforementioned version, our company professionals can solve the queries on their own without seeking support from IBM. During the installation of a prior version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker, sometimes I have to configure the failovers through the cluster, where issues arise, and I often seek help from the support team. The solution is being used by some medicine companies in our organization that receive sales orders from the EDR or JDE. I would not recommend the product to others as its becoming obsolete and they can rather choose a middleware solution from Amazon or Azure. But I would overall rate the product a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since it is a gateway, it provides a lot of security features."

"The solution is scalable, our customers are mostly South African banks and they handle mostly transactions with this solution."

"IBM is a huge organization in comparison to most of the competition, it has massive development and offers very high-quality products."

"The solution is robust."

"The solution was very stable, we had no issues with it in that sense, it didn't crash or freeze and there were no bugs or glitches."

"If you are an enterprise customer, I would definitely advise that it is better to go for IBM DataPower, because you won't need to have a proxy or any other security measures required in the DMC, and it is easy to implement and easy to maintain and scale."

"The support for IBM DataPower Gateway has been exceptional."

"I like the API Gateway feature."

More IBM DataPower Gateway pros

"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."

"The most valuable features are the product's straightforward development and deployment, and its nice graphical user interface."

"The documentation, performance, stability and scalability of the tool are valuable."

"Overall, in comparison to other solutions specific to the banking domain, this product is quite good."

"It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format."

"Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ."

"Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."

"We have a large number of use cases for this product, and it is built into the underlying infrastructure for most of our applications."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros

Cons

"My experience with the pricing of this product is that pricing is too high and should be reduced."

"Scripting needs improvement. It's hard for our customers."

"It is challenging to understand the solution's design and support skills."

"The two biggest issues of this solution are the complexity and the maintenance procedures."

"In the next release, I would like to see the product price reduced. It should be cheaper."

"The components that they include in the product that are, in fact, a WTX, really need to be removed from the product because they tend to fail."

"Its support services could be better."

"I would like the tool to improve its training."

More IBM DataPower Gateway cons

"My biggest complaint about this product is the price."

"Today I probably wouldn't go for Message Broker because of the cost structure, support, and the whole ecosystem around IBM."

"Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved."

"There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data."

"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is."

"There is some lag in the GUI. There have been some performance issues and maybe it's because of the application data."

"I find the installation configuration is quite difficult compared to other solutions."

"The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this product varies from customer to customer and the relationship with IBM, including how many offerings from IBM are already being used."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive in comparison to other products."

"This product is a bit expensive as IBM products are costly assets. However, for enterprise customers it is a worthwhile investment."

"The cost is very high and requires all five components in the API management solution."

"IBM DataPower Gateway is quite expensive to get resources to work on this product. If the price could be cheaper, I think that will make it a little bit better and easily accessible to smaller clients. Then it could compete with other solutions that are available in the market. There's a whole lot of other solutions available that work well and are cheaper than IBM's products."

"The appliance is a bit on the expensive side for the workloads that are not too high."

"It's expensive when you compare it with others."

More IBM DataPower Gateway pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"

"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."

"This product is more expensive than competing products."

"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."

"The solution is expensive."

"IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time."

"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Construction Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM DataPower Gateway?

The MPGW (Multi-Protocol Gateway) is great because it allows you to easily expose services using various protocols – web services, REST (JSON), and others. This flexibility simplifies things.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM DataPower Gateway?

I don't know if the current licensing cost of IBM DataPower Gateway is high, but I think it's acceptable. I don't have any complaints about it.

What needs improvement with IBM DataPower Gateway?

I noticed that the Gateway Script libraries could be improved, as they are not covering everything I need.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time.

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

There could be greater flexibility and agility in service creation for the product. As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordi...

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

We use the product for exposing services at the application level, integrating with various architectures like WebSphere, and handling static service creation.

IBM API Connect vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Comparisons

Compared 31% of the time

Apigee vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 6% of the time

NGINX Plus vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM DataPower Gateway Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 15% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 10% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 10% of the time

IIS vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 7% of the time

OpenESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Competitors

Product Reports

IBM DataPower Gateway

Download IBM DataPower Gateway product report

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker product report

Also Known As

WebSphere DataPower, IBM DataPower, IBM WebSphere DataPower

WebSphere Message Broker

Overview

IBM DataPower Gateway provides advanced security, multi-protocol transformation, and API management, ensuring appliance-based stability and performance. It supports enterprise-level traffic, facilitating seamless integration and deployment, though it may pose challenges in terms of pricing and user complexity.

IBM DataPower Gateway integrates as an enterprise service bus and API management platform, effectively securing APIs and managing authentication and authorization. Serving large banks and enterprises, it supports B2B transactions with data security and compliance, especially for sectors requiring GDPR adherence. Users benefit from high performance and stability, despite its premium cost and complex configuration needs. Cloud integration, user-friendliness enhancements, and improved documentation are areas where it can advance. It meets the demands of sectors like BFSI by protecting against security threats and supporting significant traffic volumes.

What are key features of IBM DataPower Gateway?

Advanced security functionalities: Comprehensive tools for authentication, authorization, and certificate management.
Multi-protocol transformation: Facilitates seamless conversions across different protocols.
Appliance-based stability: Provides a stable platform for handling enterprise traffic.
API management: Capable of managing APIs efficiently with rate-limiting and other controls.
Efficient troubleshooting tools: Streamlines issue resolution and system maintenance.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

High performance: Capable of handling large-scale enterprise traffic efficiently.
Easy integration and configuration: Simplifies connecting with existing systems.
Regulatory compliance: Supports adherence to regulations like GDPR.
Protects against security threats: Offers robust security measures for data protection.

IBM DataPower Gateway is prominent in industries requiring rigorous data security and efficient integration, such as BFSI. Large enterprises leverage it for B2B transactions, ensuring regulatory compliance and high-performance standards. It's also implemented in environments demanding robust API security and management.

IBM

IBM WebSphere Message Broker provides reliable data integration and effective management of diverse message formats. It excels in stability and scalability, supporting complex integration needs with ease, making it suitable for industries like banking and healthcare.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is a robust tool for data integration, favored for its performance with large data volumes and its ability to handle protocol transformations. It features a graphical interface that simplifies development and deployment. Users find it effective for communication with legacy systems through diverse adaptors, while its support for publish-subscribe patterns and execution groups enhances scalability. However, some challenges include the need for improved flexibility in service creation, managing complex use cases, and integrating with cloud solutions. The high cost and need for better technical support are additional concerns.

What are the most important features of IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

Stability and Reliability: Ensures consistent data integration capabilities.
Diverse Adaptors: Supports communication with legacy systems.
Scalability: Facilitates scaling with execution groups and nodes.
Graphical Interface: Offers straightforward development and deployment.
Message Queuing and Publish-Subscribe: Adds value for diverse communication needs.

What benefits or ROI should be reviewed?

Enhanced Integration: Facilitates complex data routing and transformation.
Performance with Large Data: Efficient in handling high-volume data processing.
Application Connectivity: Bridges communication between diverse systems.
Protocol Management: Handles protocol transformations effectively.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is widely implemented in banking and healthcare, playing a crucial role in connecting systems and developing integration flows. It helps organizations meet core business needs, often used for integrating core banking systems and handling tasks like pick and drop shipments. This tool helps maintain up-to-date standards in these industries.

IBM

Sample Customers

RBL Bank, Availity

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire

IBM DataPower Gateway vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker