IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker comparison

IBM DataPower Gateway vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Download the complete report

Helped 903,147 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DataPower Gateway

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

7th

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SOA Application Gateways (1st), API Management (15th)

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

9th

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of IBM DataPower Gateway is 5.2%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 4.9%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM DataPower Gateway	5.2%
IBM WebSphere Message Broker	4.9%
Other	89.9%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

AkshaySawant

Manager at CSB Bank Ltd

Security features excel but development limitations emerge

We are using the IBM DataPower Gateway for security purposes. As per the development perspective, there are some limitations with IBM DataPower Gateway because it only supports XML and XSLT language, but it does not support the Java language. This is the only limitation of the IBM DataPower Gateway. For the authentication and authorization purpose, we can use the IBM DataPower Gateway. It's a very good product. We are mostly using the IBM DataPower Gateway for security purposes and load balancing purposes. If we are handling the load for a particular server, then we can use the IBM DataPower Gateway. The IBM DataPower Gateway is mostly used for security purposes. If we have some APIs and we are using some security for those APIs, then we can use it. It can also be used as a load balancer. It's also used for certificate management, user management purposes, authentication, and authorization. For routing, the IBM DataPower Gateway has multiple URL-based routing and content-based routing capabilities. If we have multiple URLs, then we can use an XML script. Using the XSLT language, we can configure multiple URLs and implement URL-based routing. Content-based routing means if we have multiple requests, we can route the request to a particular URL. For this, we need to use the XSLT language only. We can't use XML, Java, or other scripting languages. With IBM DataPower Gateway, we are using all the APIs. All APIs have been configured on the gateway. We have configured the particular TLS profile and some TLS client profiles as well. Using that TLS profile, we have configured the APIs and authentication. We have configured some tokens also, including JWT tokens and different types of auth tokens. There is also a rate limiting feature which we use for handling API loads.

Read full review

MANUEL VALDIVIA

Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Routes messages efficiently across our services, but the features for scalability need improvement

One of the key benefits has been its ability to expose services and securely integrate applications within our architecture. It's been integral in maintaining a stable infrastructure despite its limitations with dynamic service creation and flexibility compared to newer technologies like Kubernetes. The main challenge has been scalability during peak usage times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance is good, it's been very stable, and the product is easy to integrate."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution is straightforward and for large organizations, it functions well."

"The solution is robust."

"It is very easy to set up and configure, even for users with no prior experience."

"What I like most is the stability."

"The whole purpose of this product is to provide high speed and high performance."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the appliance hardware, the software embedded within the hardware appliance machine, making it one of the best security platforms in the market that is easy to use, easy to install, and resilient for high availability."

More IBM DataPower Gateway pros

"We are using three or four services in the backend for reformatting messages, and it is straightforward to use."

"It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy."

"Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ."

"The transactions and message queuing are the most valuable features of the solution."

"IBM WebSphere Message Broker is one of the best middleware solutions"

"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."

"We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern."

"Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros

Cons

"Traceability could be improved, especially for business operations."

"New users just starting with this product find it a little complex or difficult to use, compared to other products such as AWS."

"I would like the tool to improve its training."

"The components that they include in the product that are, in fact, a WTX, really need to be removed from the product because they tend to fail."

"Its support services could be better."

"The programming language is only supported in XSLT and Gateway script."

"They should improve the solution's clustering features."

"The two biggest issues of this solution are the complexity and the maintenance procedures."

More IBM DataPower Gateway cons

"Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is."

"I know that Message Broker was a very tightly copied product with another IBM product, that is, IBM MQ. I would like to have a little bit more decoupling from the IBM MQ because it should not be a prerequisite for IBM WebSphere Message Broker usage."

"Today I probably wouldn't go for Message Broker because of the cost structure, support, and the whole ecosystem around IBM."

"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."

"The solution can add container engines such as docker."

"The product's features are not being upgraded or enhanced by the vendor"

"The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive in comparison to other products."

"The solution has a return on investment but is a little expensive."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Most customers' use case budgets are not inlined with the price of IBM DataPower Gateway. It is too expensive."

"The appliance is a bit on the expensive side for the workloads that are not too high."

"The total cost of IBM DataPower Gateway would depend on the configuration, but in my experience, it can amount to 60,000 Euros per box, even for the virtual version. Usually, customers need high availability and a non-production environment, so the total price for IBM DataPower Gateway can be quite a lot. It can be 200,000 Euros or a similar figure."

"As far as I know, they have a perpetual license for this product. They are paying perpetual fees rather than an annual subscription or annual pricing."

"The cost of this product varies from customer to customer and the relationship with IBM, including how many offerings from IBM are already being used."

More IBM DataPower Gateway pricing and cost advice

"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."

"The solution is expensive."

"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"

"IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time."

"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."

"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."

"The solution is expensive."

"This product is more expensive than competing products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,147 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM DataPower Gateway?

I don't know if the current licensing cost of IBM DataPower Gateway is high, but I think it's acceptable. I don't have any complaints about it.

What needs improvement with IBM DataPower Gateway?

I noticed that the Gateway Script libraries could be improved, as they are not covering everything I need.

What is your primary use case for IBM DataPower Gateway?

The primary purposes for which IBM DataPower Gateway is used include security purposes, and sometimes you need to put some configurations and mapping into the process.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time.

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

There could be greater flexibility and agility in service creation for the product. As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordi...

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

We use the product for exposing services at the application level, integrating with various architectures like WebSphere, and handling static service creation.

IBM API Connect vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Comparisons

Compared 29% of the time

Apigee vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

NGINX Plus vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

OpenLegacy vs IBM DataPower Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM DataPower Gateway Competitors

Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 11% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 8% of the time

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Competitors

Product Reports

IBM DataPower Gateway

Download IBM DataPower Gateway product report

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Download IBM WebSphere Message Broker product report

Also Known As

WebSphere DataPower, IBM DataPower, IBM WebSphere DataPower

WebSphere Message Broker

Overview

IBM DataPower Gateway provides advanced security, multi-protocol transformation, and API management, ensuring appliance-based stability and performance. It supports enterprise-level traffic, facilitating seamless integration and deployment, though it may pose challenges in terms of pricing and user complexity.

IBM DataPower Gateway integrates as an enterprise service bus and API management platform, effectively securing APIs and managing authentication and authorization. Serving large banks and enterprises, it supports B2B transactions with data security and compliance, especially for sectors requiring GDPR adherence. Users benefit from high performance and stability, despite its premium cost and complex configuration needs. Cloud integration, user-friendliness enhancements, and improved documentation are areas where it can advance. It meets the demands of sectors like BFSI by protecting against security threats and supporting significant traffic volumes.

What are key features of IBM DataPower Gateway?

Advanced security functionalities: Comprehensive tools for authentication, authorization, and certificate management.
Multi-protocol transformation: Facilitates seamless conversions across different protocols.
Appliance-based stability: Provides a stable platform for handling enterprise traffic.
API management: Capable of managing APIs efficiently with rate-limiting and other controls.
Efficient troubleshooting tools: Streamlines issue resolution and system maintenance.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

High performance: Capable of handling large-scale enterprise traffic efficiently.
Easy integration and configuration: Simplifies connecting with existing systems.
Regulatory compliance: Supports adherence to regulations like GDPR.
Protects against security threats: Offers robust security measures for data protection.

IBM DataPower Gateway is prominent in industries requiring rigorous data security and efficient integration, such as BFSI. Large enterprises leverage it for B2B transactions, ensuring regulatory compliance and high-performance standards. It's also implemented in environments demanding robust API security and management.

IBM

IBM WebSphere Message Broker provides reliable data integration and effective management of diverse message formats. It excels in stability and scalability, supporting complex integration needs with ease, making it suitable for industries like banking and healthcare.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is a robust tool for data integration, favored for its performance with large data volumes and its ability to handle protocol transformations. It features a graphical interface that simplifies development and deployment. Users find it effective for communication with legacy systems through diverse adaptors, while its support for publish-subscribe patterns and execution groups enhances scalability. However, some challenges include the need for improved flexibility in service creation, managing complex use cases, and integrating with cloud solutions. The high cost and need for better technical support are additional concerns.

What are the most important features of IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

Stability and Reliability: Ensures consistent data integration capabilities.
Diverse Adaptors: Supports communication with legacy systems.
Scalability: Facilitates scaling with execution groups and nodes.
Graphical Interface: Offers straightforward development and deployment.
Message Queuing and Publish-Subscribe: Adds value for diverse communication needs.

What benefits or ROI should be reviewed?

Enhanced Integration: Facilitates complex data routing and transformation.
Performance with Large Data: Efficient in handling high-volume data processing.
Application Connectivity: Bridges communication between diverse systems.
Protocol Management: Handles protocol transformations effectively.

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is widely implemented in banking and healthcare, playing a crucial role in connecting systems and developing integration flows. It helps organizations meet core business needs, often used for integrating core banking systems and handling tasks like pick and drop shipments. This tool helps maintain up-to-date standards in these industries.

IBM

Sample Customers

RBL Bank, Availity

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire

IBM DataPower Gateway vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker