Inflectra Rapise vs Qt Squish comparison

Inflectra and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Inflectra is ranked #23 with an average rating of 4.0, while Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. Inflectra holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

163 Views
79 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

2,493 Views
1,298 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Inflectra Rapise and Qt Squish are automation testing tools, competing in the domain of software testing solutions. Qt Squish has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust capabilities, which many believe justify its higher pricing.

Features: Inflectra Rapise offers versatile testing supporting various applications and platforms. Its scriptless testing simplifies the testing process. Additionally, it includes custom user functions for easy test creation and cross-browser testing. Qt Squish provides advanced object recognition and supports multiple platforms for complex applications. It integrates seamlessly with CI systems and offers extensive scripting language support, including Python, JavaScript, and more.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with more extensive systems and improved documentation for ease of use. Better cross-platform UI recognition would improve its functionality. More flexible pricing options could attract a wider customer base. Qt Squish can improve by offering more straightforward deployment for less complex systems. Enhanced customer support accessibility and potentially lowering its pricing model to match competitors could be beneficial. Adding more tutorials for users unfamiliar with advanced scripting might enhance appeal.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise is recognized for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, making it easy for beginners. Qt Squish provides a comprehensive deployment approach optimized for system integration, supported by extensive documentation and professional services. While Rapise is appreciated for simplicity, Squish is noted for robustness and integration capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise offers an economical setup, attractive to budget-conscious buyers and appreciated for its ROI due to lower initial investment. In contrast, Qt Squish demands a higher initial setup cost yet delivers strong ROI thanks to its extensive features, providing long-term value. Despite Rapise’s economic appeal, Qt Squish is preferred for deeper and more prolonged investment worth.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Qt Squish

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"It is very stable."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"I can perform Java SWT."

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The price could be better."

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

32%

Government

18%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 22% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 17% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

April 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

March 2025

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

Rapise

froglogic Squish

Overview

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Qt Squish

February 2025

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.