Inflectra SpiraTest and Tricentis qTest are both viable options for test management. Tricentis qTest takes the upper hand with its advanced features and comprehensive support, making it a more worthwhile investment for users.
Features: Inflectra SpiraTest offers robust test case management, requirements management, and defect tracking capabilities. Tricentis qTest provides comprehensive analytics, automation support, and integration with various DevOps tools. Users indicate that Tricentis qTest offers a more extensive feature set.
Room for Improvement: Inflectra SpiraTest users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities and better integration options. Tricentis qTest users highlight the need for improvements in performance speed and occasional issues with stability. Both products face specific areas to refine, but Tricentis qTest faces more substantial performance concerns.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra SpiraTest is commended for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Tricentis qTest offers a smooth deployment but receives higher praise for comprehensive support and thorough onboarding. Both products are easy to deploy, but Tricentis qTest provides a superior customer service experience.
Pricing and ROI: Inflectra SpiraTest is seen as cost-effective with a favorable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious users. Tricentis qTest, despite its higher cost, delivers a better ROI due to its advanced features and capabilities. Users find that the investment in Tricentis qTest is justified by its feature-rich offerings and long-term benefits.
Due to the fast adoption, there is a quick ROI along with faster and better maintenance due to Tosca's AI and self-healing aspects.
Support has never been an issue, except for consulting which Tricentis charges for.
As for stability and performance, apart from a few hiccups and glitches, Tricentis qTest worked fine.
There may be missing features that should be included in the next release of Tricentis qTest, such as integration with other tools, specifically integration with Parasoft.
It also does not allow for task tracking or calculating time spent on tasks, which affects project timelines.
The solution is expensive.
The pricing and execution of qTest are easy.
There are also AI insights available based on the data and defects raised, which gives a view of functionalities where there are challenges and where more regression needs to happen.
A valuable feature is the ease of uploading, as well as creating folders.
I have seen measurable benefits with Tricentis qTest in terms of time-saving and resource-saving.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis qTest | 12.5% |
| Inflectra SpiraTest | 1.6% |
| Other | 85.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
