Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Interfacing Technologies and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Interfacing Technologies is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6. Interfacing Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Interfacing Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

130 Views
58 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

6,266 Views
4,121 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and SAP Signavio Process Manager are solutions in enterprise process management. SAP Signavio Process Manager may be seen as having the upper hand with its comprehensive features suited for large enterprises, though Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is favored for its pricing and support.

Features: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center offers robust process mapping, detailed process optimization tools, and modeling capabilities. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides collaborative features, cross-departmental interaction, and seamless process integration suitable for interconnected workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center ensures a straightforward deployment model with excellent customer service for smooth implementation. SAP Signavio Process Manager has a more complex deployment supported by a proactive customer service team addressing challenges efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center offers a cost-effective solution with a lower initial setup cost and faster ROI for budget-sensitive organizations. SAP Signavio Process Manager requires a higher initial investment with a potentially greater long-term ROI due to advanced capabilities and enhanced process efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,849 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in Business Process Design

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 9.1%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."

"The solution provides data mining and AI features."

"I really like the Collaboration Hub because it's so easy to communicate. And what is really important is that you can use it asynchronously. It doesn't matter if you're working in Italy or in America. You are using the same process and you can speak about the same process."

"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."

"The most valuable feature for me is the collaboration point of view, where everybody has a single view, or source of truth, and everybody sees the same thing. Everyone can comment, contribute, and discuss the processes itself, which makes it easier to funnel down the most value adding comments and make the relevant changes to the processes. This leads to the next best iteration or version of your process."

"The features I find most valuable are ease of use and the Collaboration Hub."

"The most valuable feature is probably the nature of it."

"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

"It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient."

"Technical support has been somewhat challenging; there hasn't been much visibility on how to create a ticket or integrate with SAP."

"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."

"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."

"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."

"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."

"The solution is complex."

"The licensing model could be better."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

"The product is expensive."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"I found the pricing of the solution to be moderate compared to other choices."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 30% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

March 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

March 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Enterprise Process Center

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

The Enterprise Process Center, A BPM software, helps companies gain a 360 degree blueprint of the organization in support of complex improvement, compliance and transformation initiatives. The EPC goes beyond process mapping & analysis, it covers the full spectrum of lifecycle governance and collaboration, enterprise architecture (EA), strategy-to-execution and workflow automation needs. The EPC offers a single repository to manage all complex business entity relationships and interdependencies, including: processes, procedures, roles, org units, resources, risks, controls, policies, rules, documents, strategic objectives, key performance indicators, systems, meta data & services. The EPC facilitates the alignment and visualization of strategic and operational performance and is often leveraged for quality, improvement, risk & audit management initiatives such as ISO, Lean, Basel III, SOX, and ITIL, amongst others.

Interfacing Technologies

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., EFFORTS, Stuart Wright

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.