We haven't done any implementation in the last ten years. That said, we did upgrade it in 2017-16 to the latest version and it was quite okay. It was complex yet not too much. I'd rate it three and a half out of five in terms of ease of setup.
JD Edwards World and NetSuite OneWorld compete in the ERP market. NetSuite OneWorld has a competitive edge due to its advanced integrations and scalability, while JD Edwards World excels in cost management and customer support.
Features: JD Edwards World offers robust financial management, supply chain capabilities, and industry-specific solutions. NetSuite OneWorld focuses on multi-subsidiary management, real-time insights, and cloud-based accessibility.
Room for Improvement: JD Edwards World could enhance its user interface, integration capabilities, and scalability. NetSuite OneWorld may improve by offering better customer service, more customization options, and simplifying its pricing structure.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetSuite OneWorld offers a cloud-based deployment model with straightforward implementation and continuous vendor support. JD Edwards World, as an on-premises solution, requires more extensive setup but provides comprehensive support services.
Pricing and ROI: JD Edwards World is cost-effective with lower upfront costs and a steady ROI. NetSuite OneWorld involves a higher initial investment but offers extensive features and potential for quick scaling.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
