Jedox vs QlikView comparison

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"The solution is very versatile."

"The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"QlikView is a scalable solution that multiple users can easily use."

"The search feature: ability to see the related data."

"The user interface and dashboards are very good."

"The most useful feature of QlikView for me is the QVD concept."

"This solution has simplified getting to and understanding our data, no matter where it is housed."

"A well designed app brings freedom of inquiry to meetings, allowing me to answer questions in real time and this has transformed progress and outputs of our monthly group meeting."

"You can switch views easily."

"QlikView is extremely flexible in terms of visualization tools for communicating complex data insights."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"I don't find it particularly user-friendly."

"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."

"They should offer the capability to directly access data from SaaS environments, as it would simplify the migration process, and while it may seem like a minor enhancement, it would be beneficial to our clients."

"QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes."

"There is no automation or drag and drop functionality."

"Improvement in collaboration, between that and publishing of reports and publishing of models."

"They could improve the speed."

"QlikView is probably on the pricier side than other BI tools."

"The product's visual capabilities could be improved. The graphs and visualizations are not as aesthetic or easy to create."

"Error handling."

"Excellent value for money."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"It is quite expensive, rating at around nine out of ten on a cost scale."

"It is expensive for small companies."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."

"QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."

"Its licensing costs are moderate, but it can get expensive due to the numerous add-ons available like those for printing."

"The platform's pricing is considered quite expensive, particularly given the dollar-based pricing."

"The pricing is too high compared to the other solutions on the market."

"I rate QlikView's pricing a five out of ten."