JSCAPE by Redwood vs webMethods.io comparison

Redwood Software and IBM are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Redwood Software is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.3, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Redwood Software holds a 2.6% mindshare in MFT, compared to IBM’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Redwood Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,057 Views
416 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

449 Views
283 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

JSCAPE by Redwood and webMethods.io compete in the file transfer and integration category. JSCAPE has the upper hand for smaller businesses due to its cost efficiency, whereas webMethods.io justifies its high price for large-scale operations with extensive features.

Features: JSCAPE is known for its robust security features including encryption and authentication, making it highly secure. It supports a variety of protocols like FTP, SFTP, and HTTPS, providing flexibility. Automation through triggers simplifies tasks like compressing and emailing files. WebMethods.io provides high scalability and extensive integration capabilities with built-in support for numerous e-business standards and robust security protocols. It offers a user-friendly web interface that simplifies administration and monitoring.

Room for Improvement: JSCAPE can be costly for some small businesses and may improve by offering more flexible pricing plans. Enhancing user interface customization could also provide better user experience. Additionally, expanding integration capabilities with third-party applications can further its appeal. WebMethods.io has a high price barrier for smaller enterprises, suggesting a need for tiered pricing. The complexity of its extensive feature set might overwhelm users, necessitating simplified documentation. Improving customer support response times could enhance its user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JSCAPE is noted for its simple deployment process and a user-friendly interface that makes adoption easier for users with limited technical knowledge. Its customer support is highly responsive, providing assistance 24/7. WebMethods.io is recognized for straightforward deployment with its intuitive interface, but users have noted room for improvement in response times from customer service.

Pricing and ROI: JSCAPE offers more affordable pricing and a flexible licensing model, allowing it to be a viable option for businesses of varying sizes. It is praised for offering a high return on investment by improving operational efficiency and meeting SLA targets. WebMethods.io, while priced higher, provides extensive features for enterprise-grade solutions, delivering a strong ROI for large-scale operations that require robust integration capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Akshatha Ramesh

Junior Business Analyst at EFI

Good automation, no complex coding, and high-level data encryption

When it comes to performance and scalability, JSCAPE is a highly reliable software, however, I would suggest a few improvements: 1. The documentation needs a revamp for a better understanding of the features of the tool. 2. Customer service can be offered on call or chat. 3. The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial. 4. UI can be improved in terms of look and feel. 5. Documentation should be provided for a majority of newly released features as these can be difficult for a layman to use without proper instructions.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers audit trails and reporting tools, allowing users to track file transfers, monitor user activities, and produce regulatory compliance reports."

"Valuable features include a comprehensive management UI and a strictly controlled managed file transfer."

"The automation part of JSCAPE by Redwood is great because you can set up a scheduled delivery with files and be notified if the transfer was successful."

"It keeps a clear record of all the file transfers that take place, the person who initiated them, and the outcome of the execution."

"It is easy to transfer large sets of files."

"One of the standout features of this particular tool is its automation capabilities."

"JSCAPE provides high-level data encryption, which can help us share confidential and time-sensitive data across our global partners without any hassle."

"It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

"webMethods API Portal is overall very valuable. It is now a comprehensive API catalogue that serves various purposes, including API assessment and evaluation."

"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

"The product is powerful, straightforward, and easy to use."

"It's a good tool, and it has a stable messaging broker."

"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."

"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more accessible and appealing to the new users and it will definitely enhance the user experience."

"The user interface is something that has to be worked on."

"The FTP/S and ad-hoc techniques can further be automated."

"The initial setup is a bit hectic during the installation."

"The GUI has to be enhanced."

"Setup is time-consuming."

"The product's pricing needs improvement."

"The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

"The product must add more compatible connectors."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."

"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."

"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."

"The price is high and I give it a five out of ten."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

11%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 29% of the time

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 27% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 19% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Globalscape EFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

April 2025

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

March 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io

March 2025

Free Report: JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JSCAPE by Redwood vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.