Panaya Test Dynamix vs k6 Open Source comparison

k6 and Panaya are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. k6 is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while Panaya is ranked #13. k6 holds a 0.4% mindshare in RTT, compared to Panaya’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of k6 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panaya users who would recommend it.

k6 Open Source

Read 2 k6 Open Source reviews

72 Views
53 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

648 Views
351 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

k6 Open Source

Panaya Test Dynamix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between k6 Open Source and Panaya Test Dynamix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Panaya Test Dynamix vs. k6 Open Source Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. k6 Open Source

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

k6 Open Source

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (9th)

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (6th), Functional Testing Tools (27th), Test Management Tools (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Regression Testing Tools category, the mindshare of k6 Open Source is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 2.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Regression Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

NalinGoonawardana

Principal Consultant ( Test automation - Performance testing) at TTC Global (TTC) at TTC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services

One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.

Read full review

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

Cons

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

16%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about k6 Open Source?

The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?

k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source

Compared 53% of the time

Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 17% of the time

BlazeMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs k6 Open Source

Compared 8% of the time

More k6 Open Source Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 69% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 13% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 8% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

March 2025

Download k6 Open Source product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

March 2025

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Also Known As

Load Impact

No data available

Overview

Load Impact offers three main features:

Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Panaya

Sample Customers

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. k6 Open Source

March 2025

Free Report: Panaya Test Dynamix vs. k6 Open Source

Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. k6 Open Source and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. k6 Open Source report.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.