KiSSFLOW and Pillir compete in workflow automation and SAP application modernization, respectively. KiSSFLOW has the upper hand in ease of use and quick adoption, while Pillir excels in integration and scalability.
Features: KiSSFLOW users value ease of use, customization, and quick setup. Pillir users value strong SAP integration, flexibility, and enterprise-grade features.
Room for Improvement: KiSSFLOW needs better reporting capabilities, improved performance, and enhanced technical performance. Pillir requires better user training resources, interface optimization for non-SAP users, and addressing the learning curve.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KiSSFLOW offers quick deployment and efficient customer service. Pillir's deployment is straightforward but may require additional support for complex setups. Both have well-rated customer service, with KiSSFLOW noted for its proactive approach.
Pricing and ROI: KiSSFLOW users find it cost-effective with a quick ROI due to low setup costs and immediate productivity gains. Pillir users recognize higher initial costs but commend its long-term ROI due to robust features and scalability.
Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.