Kiuwan vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Kiuwan and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Kiuwan is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.8, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. Kiuwan holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Kiuwan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,430 Views
1,094 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

156 Views
93 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and Kiuwan are both leading solutions in the cybersecurity and application analytics domain. Kiuwan seems to have the upper hand with its emphasis on security intelligence and robust analytics platform.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers comprehensive testing capabilities that simulate real-world scenarios, ease of deployment, and strong customer service. Kiuwan provides critical insights into application security, a robust analytics platform, and powerful features that justify its higher cost.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could enhance integration with other tools, improve scalability options, and refine its user interface. Kiuwan users suggest more flexibility in customization, better reporting tools, and quicker customer support responses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood's deployment is straightforward, with commendable customer service for troubleshooting. Kiuwan's deployment is efficient, though there are occasional delays in customer support responses.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is viewed as affordable with reasonable setup costs, providing satisfactory ROI. Kiuwan's higher setup cost is justified by its significant return on investment due to advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

More Kiuwan pros

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

Cons

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

More Kiuwan cons

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Check with your account manager."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 54% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 78% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 22% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

April 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

April 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Free Report: Kiuwan vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiuwan vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.