Kount vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

Kount and NICE are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Kount is ranked #13, while NICE is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7. Kount holds a 1.5% mindshare in FDP, compared to NICE’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kount users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of NICE users who would recommend it.

Kount

Read 3 Kount reviews

624 Views
201 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...

Read 17 Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management reviews

2,215 Views
775 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Kount

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and Kount compete in fraud detection and management. Kount seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher price.

Features: Nice Actimize offers robust analytics, real-time decision-making, and integrated case management. Kount is known for advanced machine learning capabilities, fraud prevention specifically tailored for e-commerce, and a more dynamic user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nice Actimize provides an integrated solution which can be complex to deploy but is supported by strong customer service. Kount's cloud-based model ensures ease of deployment, quick implementation, and seamless integration, with customer service noted for being responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Nice Actimize is perceived as more budget-friendly, offering a good ROI for its price, attractive for larger enterprises. Kount, although more expensive, delivers higher long-term ROI through increased efficiency and effectiveness in fraud prevention.

To learn more, read our detailed Kount vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kount vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kount

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Kount is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is 6.3%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Featured Reviews

Chris Zappato

Fraud Analyst at Pinterest

Features a large database of fraud signals and indicators to stop fraud in its tracks

At my old company, I used to use a tool called Sift. It's another great tool, but I prefer Kount. The major differences between the two solutions are how they're laid out and how fast you can gather as much information as possible. I personally prefer Kount — that's my personal preference. I've worked with both platforms for many years. I personally prefer Kount for the way that they display information and for the variety and flexibility they offer when it comes to the rules — from very simple to very complex. Kount is better designed for catching fraud, detecting fraud, and preventing fraud. Sift is also great; you will not go wrong if you go with Sift, but I personally prefer Kount.

Read full review

Jahnavi Koppala

Actimize Developer at Infosys

A good designer for the UI, stable, and scalable

I give the solution a ten out of ten. Unlike other technologies, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is partially pre-built, making it easy to understand what needs to be done and how to complete the work. Furthermore, due to the pre-existing code, there is no need to start from scratch, providing a better understanding of the current situation and what needs to be implemented. Our organization moved to Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management because the solution is an upgraded version and also it provides many benefits as we can easily activate rules. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is very convenient and it provides easy access to everything. When utilizing the solution for the first time, always start with a lower environment such as a development environment. Only use Dell and SIT, and do not go directly to production. The solution may have an impact on the bank and large transactions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was absolutely straightforward. Within a week I was fully working."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to create your own ruleset and edit it whenever you want. Their reporting functionality is very helpful. It's really robust."

"It's an in-depth, all-in-one solution."

"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."

"I like the score generated on the Actimize platform for each customer transaction. Those are transactions per second, accommodating millions of transactions per second. That's the best feature of Actimize."

"The case management tool is user friendly."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."

"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."

"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."

"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management pros

Cons

"The time that is taken to go to Kount and come back should be in the order of around 100 milliseconds or less. And our context was taking around 200 to 300 milliseconds. We didn't want the extra load of 100 milliseconds to happen, so if the two rounds of stability could be cut to one, that would be very helpful."

"They could do a little bit better with chargeback management. There are other solutions out there that I've heard about, like Accertify that have a better chargeback platform where they're integrated more with the banks or in terms of how the workflow is and how you can respond to chargebacks."

"The rule system and automation could be expanded a little bit more."

"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."

"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."

"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."

"Processes don't function when front end is down."

"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."

"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."

"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."

"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is great — I think it's totally worth what they're charging because the benefits are great."

"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."

"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."

"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."

"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."

"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

42%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?

The solution is reasonable for enterprise customers.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?

We use the solution as an anti-money laundering application to monitor financial crimes.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

Comparisons

Riskified vs Kount

Compared 46% of the time

Forter vs Kount

Compared 33% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs Kount

Compared 20% of the time

More Kount Competitors

Verafin Fraud Detection and Management vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 20% of the time

BAE Systems NetReveal vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 19% of the time

FICO Falcon Platform vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 17% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Safer Payments vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 9% of the time

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kount

March 2025

Download Kount product report

Buyer's Guide

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

March 2025

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management report

Download Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Actimize, NICE Actimize

Overview

Kount’s patented machine learning technology analyzes transactions to stop fraud and increase revenue for online businesses, merchants, acquiring banks, and payment service providers.

Kount

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management facilitates fast data processing and effective transaction monitoring with customizable alert rules, offering robust support for compliance and security needs.

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management integrates efficiently into existing systems, processing substantial transaction volumes with responsive data handling, alert generation, and detailed reporting. Its adaptive rule engine simplifies customization, eliminating the need for development assistance. Clients benefit from automation, comprehensive case management, and a comprehensive dashboard, enhancing fraud detection and user engagement. Despite its strengths, areas needing improvement include front-end dependency management, integration capabilities, and intuitive updates.

What are the key features?

Fast Data Loading: Quickly processes large transaction volumes.
Alert Generation: Customizable alerts for proactive fraud detection.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed and accessible reports.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy navigation and management.
Case Management: Effective oversight for compliance activities.
Robust Rule Engine: Customization without developer input.
Wide Database Support: Integrates seamlessly with different systems.
Automation: Enhances efficiency and security measures.
Flexible Model Customization: Tailors to specific business needs.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Proactive detection and prevention of fraud.
Improved Compliance: Supports adherence to regulatory standards.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines transaction processing.
Retained User Trust: Ensures consistent customer due diligence.

Financial institutions utilize Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management primarily for transaction monitoring and anti-money laundering tasks. These establishments, such as banks, employ its various modules to detect fraud, manage cases, and support their compliance efforts. It aids in monitoring suspicious activities, assessing risk, and ensuring customer interactions are secure and reliable, providing visibility across multiple global branches.

NICE

Sample Customers

CD Baby, Crate & Barrel, Domino's Pizza, Dunkin' Brands, Hydrobuilder, Jagex, JOANN Fabric & Crafts, Leatherman, Micro Center, Staples, The Iconic, The Source, The Vitamin Shoppe, TickPick and WebJet.

Associated Banc-Corp

Buyer's Guide

Kount vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

March 2025

Free Report: Kount vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Kount vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kount vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management report.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.