LeanIX vs QualiWare X comparison

SAP LeanIX and QualiWare are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. SAP LeanIX is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while QualiWare is ranked #20 with an average rating of 6.0. SAP LeanIX holds a 15.9% mindshare in AM, compared to QualiWare’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of SAP LeanIX users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QualiWare users who would recommend it.

LeanIX

Read 21 LeanIX reviews

6,383 Views
3,236 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

QualiWare X

Read 3 QualiWare X reviews

333 Views
206 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

LeanIX

QualiWare X

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

QualiWare X and LeanIX are enterprise architecture management products. LeanIX appears to have an advantage due to its intuitive design and comprehensive feature set.

Features: QualiWare X provides comprehensive modeling tools, advanced simulation, and analytical capabilities. LeanIX is known for its intuitive interface, real-time collaboration, and efficient IT landscape management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LeanIX offers cloud-based deployment for quick implementation and seamless updates with responsive customer service. QualiWare X provides on-premises and cloud options, featuring a more traditional support structure.

Pricing and ROI: QualiWare X requires a significant initial setup cost but delivers ROI through its modeling capabilities and flexibility. LeanIX, although priced higher, provides ROI by reducing operational complexity and improving IT management efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed LeanIX vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LeanIX vs. QualiWare X

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LeanIX

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QualiWare X

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of LeanIX is 15.9%, up from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Umit Sengul

Enterprise Architect at E.ON

A platform that facilitates efficient IT architecture management and integration, improving organizational coordination and decision-making

LeanIX is primarily used to create and manage architectural models, link capabilities, activities, and products and generate comprehensive reports. It serves as a central platform for overseeing the IT landscape within EON, a large organization, streamlining operations and enhancing governance…

Read full review

Gavin Bérubé

Enterprise Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive

We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material. I like the solution's traceability. The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies."

"The solution provides a single window view of business, application, data, and technology views of the IT ecosystem."

"Ease of use is the most valuable feature. From an enterprise architecture perspective, it's not too cumbersome with too many functionalities, yet it has a lot of attributes for the content it covers."

"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly and the user experience. It's easy to map the fact sheets."

"The most valuable features are the clean user interface and the fact sheet feature in Application Portfolio Management. The tool integrates well with ServiceNow, which is the usual CMDB platform."

"The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments."

"The usability is very high. It almost looks like a Facebook for Enterprise architecture, it's pretty nice. It's HTML5 based. The repository is very easy. It has 10 different ways of sorting the objects you have in your architecture repository. Maintaining new data or to add data to your repository is very easy."

"The most valuable feature would be application portfolio management, which is where they came from, but over time, they have got artificial intelligence. They built up a very good repository. If I identify a system by name, from historical information, oftentimes, they can tell me that this is deployed with this number of CPUs and they can give me a really good profile of the application for me to put it into a change management database with very little effort."

More LeanIX pros

"I like the solution's traceability."

Cons

"The whole integration architecture view of interfaces/data exchange could be improved."

"The solution’s API integration needs to improve. I would like to see a digital screen watch feature also in the solution."

"I think the tool's main issue might be direct integrations."

"The modeling could be improved."

"They could include a combination of LeanIX and some modeling extensions."

"The solution needs to incorporate a data patch tool that moves within and irons data."

"Report generation could be more detailed. There are some shortcomings when creating reports. We can't create tag-based reports or go beyond basic technical reports."

"Another area for improvement is that when you're starting to look into more advanced information, using the solution's APIs and its customizations, documentation for that specific aspect is not very good. There is not too much support built into the offering for that aspect, for a developer."

More LeanIX cons

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very good. We definitely get good value for the money."

"LeanIX uses application-based account licensing, where the cost is multiplied by the number of applications in the software implementation."

"The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is competitive and in line with other products."

"It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications."

"The tool needs to include more flexible licensing options. We do not use the tool all the time. So pricing should be considered only when we use the tool."

"I would rate the pricing a one out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"As the tool is cloud-based, its cost is more affordable."

"There is a sweet spot of where they need to be on pricing right now. They could go up a little bit in pricing, but it has to do with the cost savings, and it has to do with the practitioners using it. I use it where I get cost savings and I can justify it, but they probably have the ability to flex a 10% up channel on their sales on that. So, they could increase their settle price, not their offering price, when they sell. They can probably hold that up a little bit higher than it is because there are cost savings that we can drive from it."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

34%

Computer Software Company

15%

Construction Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi @Cheryl Joseph Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...

See all answers

What do you like most about LeanIX?

The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LeanIX?

LeanIX is associated with high costs. It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications. The first pricing ...

See all answers

What do you like most about QualiWare X?

I like the solution's traceability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QualiWare X?

I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QualiWare X?

The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling.

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs LeanIX

Compared 22% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs LeanIX

Compared 14% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs LeanIX

Compared 10% of the time

iServer vs LeanIX

Compared 7% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs LeanIX

Compared 7% of the time

More LeanIX Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X

Compared 65% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs QualiWare X

Compared 35% of the time

More QualiWare X Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LeanIX

February 2025

Download LeanIX product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

February 2025

Download QualiWare X product report

Overview

LeanIX delivers collaborative Enterprise Architecture designed for modern IT. Our open, data-driven architecture management model helps organizations adapt to the evolving demands of digital. From agile to multi-cloud and beyond, architecture teams using LeanIX have the power to strategically support the business and report 45% reduction in time to value delivery. More than 90,000 users across enterprises worldwide rely on LeanIX to manage their IT landscape, including adidas, Bosch, 7Eleven, and Zalando.

SAP LeanIX

QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.

QualiWare

Sample Customers

adidas, Bosch, Chico's, Haworth, Helvetia, KuKa, Osram, Telekom, TUI, Santander, Swarovski, Vaillant, 7Eleven, and Zalando.

Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD

Buyer's Guide

LeanIX vs. QualiWare X

January 2025

Free Report: LeanIX vs. QualiWare X

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LeanIX vs. QualiWare X report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.