LiveAction LiveNX vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications comparison

BlueCat and VMware are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. BlueCat is ranked #48 with an average rating of 7.0, while VMware is ranked #29 with an average rating of 9.0. BlueCat holds a 0.4% mindshare in IM, compared to VMware’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of VMware users who would recommend it.

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

583 Views
423 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Read 12 VMware Aria Operations for Applications reviews

1,344 Views
1,198 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

LiveAction LiveNX and VMware Aria Operations for Applications compete in network management solutions. VMware Aria Operations for Applications is superior due to its robust feature set, despite some pricing and support advantages for LiveAction LiveNX.

Features: LiveAction LiveNX provides real-time network visualization, advanced monitoring, and diagnostics tools for network performance and security. Its comprehensive insights into traffic behavior are key assets. VMware Aria Operations for Applications focuses on application performance management, enhanced analytics, and strong troubleshooting capabilities, ideal for managing diverse cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: LiveAction LiveNX could improve in scaling capabilities, integration with third-party applications, and enhancing cloud management features. VMware Aria Operations for Applications may benefit from streamlining deployment processes, reducing complexity in setup, and improving cost-effectiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveAction LiveNX offers a straightforward deployment process and effective customer support, allowing for quick implementation. VMware Aria Operations for Applications involves a more complex setup but offers extensive support for multi-cloud operations and detailed implementation guidance, aiding comprehensive integration into existing IT infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: LiveAction LiveNX has a competitive setup cost and delivers significant ROI through its network management capabilities, making it cost-effective. VMware Aria Operations for Applications requires a higher upfront investment but justifies its pricing through enhanced functionality and application-centric insights, offering long-term value for businesses heavily invested in cloud operations.

To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (50th)

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

29th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (27th), Container Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Doshi

IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support

Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.

Read full review

ToniLindberg

senior consultant at Virtual Consultants Sverige AB

Troubleshooting capabilities have improved application monitoring and support engagement

I can see what happens end to end, which is pretty beneficial. The solution has troubleshooting capabilities, providing a direct connection to knowledge base articles from VMware Broadcom. When I encounter an error, I can search directly within the system to see what solutions have been employed by others. It has a familiar interface, which makes it easy to get started.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers significant features such as real-time statistics, the ability to identify possible issues within the VM environment, and helpful heat maps."

"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."

"VMware comes with a support team, and if you have trouble, you can easily create a ticket, and VMware will help you. Therefore, the best aspect is the support."

"No issues with stability."

"The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities."

"People are very pleased with the implementation."

"The stability of Aria Operations for Applications has improved significantly over the years."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications pros

Cons

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."

"An area for improvement would be more in-depth reporting, such as analyzing disk IO during business hours compared to after hours."

"The implementation is a long process that should be improved."

"The documentation and integration with Kubernetes could be improved."

"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack."

"I find that there could be improvements in the support service response time, as the urgency varies unless specified as Priority 2 or 1 cases."

"The solution could be expensive, which might be a limiting factor."

"I find that there could be improvements in the support service response time, as the urgency varies unless specified as Priority 2 or 1 cases."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very expensive."

"We use the free version."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

"The licensing costs are very high, particularly when you consider that we have to purchase a level 1 license for every integration, such as the load balancer, HAProxy, and the MSSP. And if you want to use vSAN, that's another license. Then, of course, Tanzu Observability has its own separate license."

"I would rate the pricing as three out of five."

"I don't have the details. In our case, there is a mixture in place. We have production usage, and we are also doing training for VMware. So, we also have a training instance. It is worth the money you would spend on it. That's because if you were to build all of this yourself by using some of the open source tools, then you would need a lot of time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

The cost of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is fair and reasonable compared to what we receive in support and packages from VMware.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

I find that there could be improvements in the support service response time, as the urgency varies unless specified as Priority 2 or 1 cases.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

Our primary use case for VMware Aria Operations for Applications is to enhance application monitoring tasks, allowing us to set up alerts for different components and send them via SMTP to a team d...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 23% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 17% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Grafana vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 6% of the time

Prometheus Group vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 6% of the time

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

March 2025

VMware Aria Operations for Applications report

Download VMware Aria Operations for Applications product report

Also Known As

LiveNX

Tanzu Observability, Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is a powerful tool for monitoring and analyzing the performance and availability of applications and infrastructure in real-time.

With its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, visualizing and analyzing data becomes effortless. The real-time alerting system ensures timely issue resolution, while scalability and a user-friendly interface provide a seamless experience for smooth operations.

VMware

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Databricks 4. DigitalOcean 5. Equinix 6. Fidelity Investments 7. Google 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 9. Honeywell 10. IBM 11. Intel 12. JetBlue Airways 13. LinkedIn 14. Lyft 15. Mastercard 16. Microsoft 17. MongoDB 18. Netflix 19. Nvidia 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Pinterest 23. Qualcomm 24. Red Hat 25. Salesforce 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Square 29. TMobile 30. Twitter 31. Uber 32. VMware

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

April 2025

Free Report: LiveAction LiveNX vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction LiveNX vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LiveAction LiveNX vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.