Logz.io vs Rapid7 InsightIDR comparison

Logz.io and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Logz.io is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.4, while Rapid7 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1. Logz.io holds a 0.3% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Rapid7’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Logz.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Logz.io

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

652 Views
455 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Read 31 Rapid7 InsightIDR reviews

5,221 Views
2,921 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Logz.io

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Rapid7 InsightIDR and Logz.io each offer unique advantages in the cybersecurity solutions category. Despite wider adoption of Rapid7 InsightIDR for its ease of use, users prefer the comprehensive features and higher scalability of Logz.io.

Features: Rapid7 InsightIDR is praised for strong threat detection and response capabilities. Logz.io stands out with better integration, data analytics features, and flexible data handling. Users are impressed with Logz.io's open-source tools, which are beneficial in feature-rich environments.

Room for Improvement: Users of Rapid7 InsightIDR seek enhancements in log correlation, reporting functionalities, and user interface. Logz.io users desire improved alert accuracy, reduced false positives, and better performance under heavy load.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightIDR is appreciated for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Users find the setup intuitive and the support team knowledgeable. Logz.io, while recognized for ease of deployment, receives mixed feedback regarding customer service, indicating room for improvement in support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 InsightIDR is viewed as cost-effective with a solid ROI due to its efficient detection and response capabilities. Logz.io users find the investment justified by superior features and flexibility, despite a higher upfront cost. The differing perceptions underscore user prioritization of immediate cost versus long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Logz.io vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Logz.io

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (21st)

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th), Threat Deception Platforms (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Logz.io is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightIDR is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Dec 12, 2023

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

JensWolf

Systems Administrator at Gernandt & Danielsson Advokatbyrå KB

Sep 28, 2023

A solution that offers easy setup and deployment phases, along with great scalability and stability

I use Rapid7 InsightIDR to collect logs and information from throughout our company's entire IT environment The most valuable feature of the solution is the single pane of glass that allows me to see all the information in one spot. I can see at one spot to see all the information from all the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

"I like the tool's user analysis feature."

"Another very important part of insightIDR is the ability to collect data from endpoint devices via agent software. With a large remote workforce, this allows visibility into the endpoints that are connected to the internet, but not to the corporate network."

"Rapid7 is easy to use and deploy. It is a simple solution and has easy data pulling."

"Integration with threat modeling from the Metasploit and InsightIDR repositories."

"Rapid7's reporting is more robust than Tenable's."

"We were able to identify criminals attempting to login from China and put a stop on their IP locations."

"Features for user behavior analytics and the rules for attack review are good."

"The technical support is a solid 10 out of 10 as they take the time to answer any questions or problems which may arise in a reasonable time frame."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pros

Cons

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

"The solution's XDR agents cannot compete with the XDR solutions out there yet."

"Sometimes, it is hard to get the right queries to use. Currently, the tool lacks a pre-made set of queries."

"It would be useful to import threat intelligence in YARA format along with known incorrect email addresses."

"Tenable Nessus is easier to deal with. It's more efficient and accurate. InsightIDR is heavier than Tenable in terms of performance and scanning. Rapid7 would be much easier to use if it had a network connector like Tenable. Tenable's connector allows continuous monitoring over the B caps."

"The reporting is the weakest aspect. There needs to be multi-level grouping for events (for example, group by user and destination). Right now, we can do a group by user and a separate table or group by destination. But I'd be more interested in where a person was logging into instead of who was logging in or where he was logging in."

"The main problem lies in the processes within the client's operating systems."

"The integration capabilities of the solution have certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"I would like to see more development in InsightIDR towards building their SIEM solution and converting it to XDR."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a little expensive."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

"The tool is an open source product."

"Licensing is by endpoint and amount of retention time (at least ours is). Default retention was one year, but we are able to push the retention further if needed. There's also a provide-your-own-S3 option for longer retention if you don't want to pay for the additional retention years in your Rapid7 agreement."

"It is on a yearly basis. For our own company, for about 250 users, it was 16,000 euros a year."

"Licensing is straightforward. If, for some reason, you don’t meet the minimum licensing requirements, there is a third-party managed service that can help."

"Accurately predict your licensing counts as this is a subscription based product."

"I am sure that there are cheaper products out there, but none that meet so many of our needs whilst maintaining stability and usability."

"The solution has a mid-range price point in the market"

"Rapid7 InsightIDR's pricing is reasonable."

"The team is very willing to work with companies. My suggestion is to call the Rapid7 sales department and see how they can help."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

See all answers

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightIDR?

During simulations or demonstrations, the tool generates alerts, providing details such as the specific application, its origin, and potential threats. For instance, it can identify if an applicati...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightIDR?

The product pricing is very cheap.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 37% of the time

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 23% of the time

Wazuh vs Logz.io

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 11% of the time

Graylog vs Logz.io

Compared 9% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

Darktrace vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 11% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io

October 2024

Download Logz.io product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightIDR

October 2024

Download Rapid7 InsightIDR product report

Also Known As

Logz

InsightIDR

Learn More

Logz.io

Rapid7

Overview

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Parsing hundreds of trivial alerts. Managing a mountain of data. Manually forwarding info from your endpoints. Forget that. InsightIDR instantly arms you with the insight you need to make better decisions across the incident detection and response lifecycle, faster.

Sample Customers

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter

Liberty Wines, Pioneer Telephone, Visier

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

October 2024

Free Report: Logz.io vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Logz.io vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logz.io vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.