Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Loom Systems vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring comparison

ServiceNow and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ServiceNow is ranked #66, while Splunk is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. ServiceNow holds a 0.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of ServiceNow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Loom Systems
Read 4 Loom Systems reviews
  • 295 Views
  • 193 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Splunk Infrastructure Monit...
Read 32 Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reviews
  • 1,368 Views
  • 735 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Loom Systems and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring compete in the IT operations and infrastructure monitoring industry. While Loom Systems offers competitive pricing and effective customer support, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring leads in features and analytics for complex environments.

Features: Loom Systems provides predictive analytics, AI-driven insights, and proactive monitoring of IT infrastructure. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring supports advanced alerting, flexible data integration, and comprehensive analytics that make it suitable for organizations with diverse data sources.

Room for Improvement: Loom Systems can enhance its scalability, expand its feature set for complex environments, and improve integration with third-party services. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing its learning curve, and offering more cost-effective pricing options for smaller companies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Loom Systems features a user-friendly deployment model with strong customer service, aiding easy setup and support. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, with a steeper learning curve, provides extensive documentation and a robust support network, offering scalability for larger setups.

Pricing and ROI: Loom Systems offers a cost-effective pricing model, delivering faster ROI for small to mid-sized organizations. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring requires a higher initial investment but provides substantial long-term ROI through its analytical capabilities and adaptability to extensive data environments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Loom Systems vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Loom Systems vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Loom Systems
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
66th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)
Splunk Infrastructure Monit...
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (11th), Container Management (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident
What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.
Read full review
Nagendra Nekkala. - PeerSpot reviewer
Is easy to use, provides great visibility, and reduces our resolution time
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is easy to use. It helps us quickly analyze how our infrastructure is performing across various services. It helps with proper log management, allowing us to monitor our systems and analyze log data regularly. It also provides security operations capabilities for monitoring system health and ensuring uptime. We noticed these benefits immediately. Our operational efficiency has been increased. It has improved our system health by monitoring the performance of data on servers, virtual machines, and containers, along with overall background processes. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides end-to-end visibility into our cloud-native environment. This is crucial because any data corruption can impact all the information we've deployed. It also aids in log management, offering parameters that extend its functionality as a comprehensive monitoring tool for CPU, memory usage, and network traffic. It has helped reduce our mean time to detect by four hours.Our mean time to resolution has been reduced by two hours. By providing access to all our network parameters, it simplifies log ingestion through streamlined calculations. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides us with faster and more comprehensive insights into our infrastructure, allowing us to focus on critical business initiatives. We saw the time to value immediately after deploying Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."
"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."
"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."
"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."
"The most valuable feature in this solution is the log searching."
"It is very easy to monitor multiple cloud environments. It's like a single pane of glass for us. We can use it to monitor our on-prem and both of our cloud environments as opposed to having different tools for each environment. It makes it all come together in one tool."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is its ability to get information about all of the security measurements in my environment."
"The tool's stability is great."
"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."
"The tool is efficient in collecting, monitoring and evaluating logs."
"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"It's a very easy-to-use solution."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring pros
 

Cons

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."
"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."
"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"
"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."
"A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers."
"The price has room for improvement."
"The end-to-end visibility is lacking because Splunk cannot directly monitor network devices."
"They do not have all the features that I expect right now."
"We still use Splunk Enterprise licensing. A lot of the newer features go into Splunk Cloud before Enterprise. We're not looking to switch our licensing over, so we're falling behind on the newer features."
"We never had any issues when it comes to the type of use cases we are using it for. We did not need more advancement on it, but I know that, in general, everything can be updated. There are tiny little tweaks that can be made regardless of whether it looks better or has a different flow to it than it does right now, but it works pretty well for what we use it for."
"There is not a lot of support for the tool's on-premises version, especially since everything is on the cloud."
"The deployment can be quite complex."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."
"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."
"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."
"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."
"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."
"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
16%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Media Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
The vibrant dashboards are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive. Till ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
We never had any issues when it comes to the type of use cases we are using it for. We did not need more advancement on it, but I know that, in general, everything can be updated. There are tiny li...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Elastic Search vs Loom Systems Logo
Elastic Search vs Loom Systems
Compared 100% of the time
More Loom Systems Competitors
Amazon CloudWatch vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Amazon CloudWatch vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 17% of the time
Rancher Labs vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Rancher Labs vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 15% of the time
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 13% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 8% of the time
Nagios XI vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Nagios XI vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 7% of the time
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
December 2024
Loom Systems reportDownload Loom Systems product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
November 2024
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reportDownload Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Splunk Insights for Infrastructure
 

Learn More

ServiceNow
Splunk
 

Overview

Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers features including, Instant visualization, real-time actionable alerts, centralized enterprise controls, and scalability. 

Instant visualization

Get fast time to value with over 250+ cloud service integrations and pre-built dashboards out of the box for rapid, full-stack visualization. Autodiscover, break down, group, and explore clouds, services and systems in minutes.

Real-time actionable alerts

Act before infrastructure performance affects end-user experience. Instantly detect and accurately alerts on dynamic thresholds, multiple conditions and complex rules to eliminate alert storms and dramatically reduce MTTD/MTTR.

Centralized, enterprise controls

Answer business-critical questions in context and monitor service-level objectives and indicators instantly. Track custom metrics for business KPIs to token based access and usage controls.

Scale with confidence

Troubleshoot across thousands of microservices, multiple ephemeral deployments, application versions and billions of events. Release better apps faster and drive closed-loop automation for a flawless end-user experience.

 

Sample Customers

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica
Entrust Datacard
Buyer's Guide
Loom Systems vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
December 2024
Free Report: Loom Systems vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Find out what your peers are saying about Loom Systems vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Loom Systems vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.