Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo

Top 10 Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.2 out of 5
Post review

Top Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, and Nagios XI. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Zabbix excels in cost-effectiveness and ease of integration, suitable for budget-conscious users managing numerous hosts. In comparison, Splunk's rich analytics set and robust cloud capabilities justify its higher cost for those seeking advanced data insights and real-time visibility across environments.
Download Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix requires minimal upfront costs for setup, whereas Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix requires minimal upfront costs for setup, whereas Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring involves a higher initial investment.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is praised for its affordability and user-friendly interface, appealing to small to medium-sized businesses. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring's robust analytics and integration capabilities make it suitable for enterprises seeking scalable, advanced monitoring solutions. PRTG is easy to deploy, while Splunk excels in performance and features.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a low initial setup cost, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring requires a higher upfront investment. PRTG offers a more affordable entry point for organizations compared to Splunk's higher cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a low initial setup cost, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring requires a higher upfront investment. PRTG offers a more affordable entry point for organizations compared to Splunk's higher cost structure.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI is valuable for those seeking a cost-effective, open-source solution that benefits from plugin extensibility. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring appeals to organizations requiring robust integration and dynamic visualizations, accepting its higher pricing for comprehensive real-time data capabilities.
Download Nagios XI vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Nagios XI generally involves a lower setup cost, making it an affordable choice for smaller businesses, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring tends to have higher initial expenses, appealing more to enterprises seeking comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI generally involves a lower setup cost, making it an affordable choice for smaller businesses, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring tends to have higher initial expenses, appealing more to enterprises seeking comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers robust data integration and custom dashboards, optimizing performance and resolution. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management excels in event management and ITSM integration. Splunk may appeal to those seeking detailed visibility, while ServiceNow suits comprehensive IT operations needs.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has a comparatively lower setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management tends to involve a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has a comparatively lower setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management tends to involve a higher initial investment.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Cisco Intersight
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Cisco Intersight
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers advanced data integration and customizable dashboards, making it ideal for environments requiring robust observability. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in cloud integration and manageability, appealing to organizations seeking competitive pricing and straightforward integration with cloud platforms.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Intersight involves additional fees for premium features, emphasizing a significant difference in initial expenditure between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Intersight involves additional fees for premium features, emphasizing a significant difference in initial expenditure between the solutions.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management offers extensive event management and asset integration, appealing to organizations managing diverse global assets. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring excels in real-time analytics across cloud and on-premises environments, providing a flexible dashboard for data consolidation.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher setup cost, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers a more cost-effective initial setup. The substantial difference in setup costs may impact budget considerations for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher setup cost, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers a more cost-effective initial setup. The substantial difference in setup costs may impact budget considerations for potential users.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos provides advanced real-time monitoring and customization for diverse platforms, ideal for proactive incident management. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring emphasizes data analytics and cloud support, making it suitable for cloud-native environments seeking end-to-end visibility with strong real-time insights.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
ITRS Geneos setup costs are often seen as higher due to initial configuration needs, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring presents a more straightforward setup with potentially lower costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos setup costs are often seen as higher due to initial configuration needs, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring presents a more straightforward setup with potentially lower costs.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
OpsRamp offers effective pricing, support, and essential IT management tools. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides superior real-time analytics, which may justify higher costs. OpsRamp suits simpler deployments, while Splunk benefits those needing detailed monitoring and advanced, long-term analytical capabilities.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
OpsRamp's setup costs are typically lower, offering an economical entry, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring often involves higher setup expenses, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
OpsRamp's setup costs are typically lower, offering an economical entry, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring often involves higher setup expenses, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
3.8 out of 5
VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers detailed analytics and seamless VMware integration, ideal for organizations invested in VMware infrastructure. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring's advanced real-time capabilities suit complex IT environments, making it a compelling choice for those seeking granular monitoring and operational efficiencies.
Download Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers straightforward setup costs with simplicity, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring may involve higher initial setup costs with more complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers straightforward setup costs with simplicity, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring may involve higher initial setup costs with more complexity.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Huawei eSight offers competitive pricing and support with network management and automation, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides superior real-time analytics and scalability, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing advanced data insights and flexible cloud deployments.
Download Huawei eSight vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Huawei eSight has a straightforward setup cost while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring requires a more flexible pricing model, highlighting the clear pricing differences between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Huawei eSight has a straightforward setup cost while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring requires a more flexible pricing model, highlighting the clear pricing differences between the two solutions.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
ControlUp excels in real-time performance monitoring and easy deployment, ideal for high-security environments. In comparison, Splunk offers strong log searching and data analytics, appealing to enterprises requiring broad cloud integration and consolidated data dashboards. Each addresses distinct infrastructure needs effectively.
Download ControlUp vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
ControlUp features a straightforward, lower setup cost compared to Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, which involves a more complex and higher initial setup cost. The significant difference lies in their respective setup processes and initial financial requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
ControlUp features a straightforward, lower setup cost compared to Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, which involves a more complex and higher initial setup cost. The significant difference lies in their respective setup processes and initial financial requirements.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX offers competitive pricing and detailed network visualization for swift deployments. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, with higher setup costs, emphasizes scalability and machine learning, providing extensive analytics and integration options, appealing to enterprises seeking long-term value and comprehensive functionality.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
LiveAction LiveNX offers higher initial setup costs, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX offers higher initial setup costs, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides a more budget-friendly setup.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Pandora FMS excels in simple licensing, diverse environment monitoring, and network stability management. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers robust log searching, reporting, and flexible dashboards. Tech buyers might choose Pandora FMS for competitive pricing, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides strong data integration and predictive insights.
Download Pandora FMS vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Pandora FMS offers competitive setup costs, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Pandora FMS offers competitive setup costs, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring may require a higher initial investment.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.0 out of 5
Dell CloudIQ excels in integration within Dell environments, offering automated health checks for efficient management. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides robust analytics and real-time insights, appealing to businesses needing extensive data analysis and feature-rich monitoring capabilities.
Download Dell CloudIQ vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Dell CloudIQ has a simpler setup cost structure, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring involves a more complex setup process, emphasizing a difference in initial implementation efforts.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell CloudIQ has a simpler setup cost structure, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring involves a more complex setup process, emphasizing a difference in initial implementation efforts.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
OP5 Monitor
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
OP5 Monitor
4.3 out of 5
OP5 Monitor appeals with its cost-effective pricing and easy deployment, ideal for immediate ROI. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides advanced analytics and real-time insights, requiring more upfront investment but delivering value for those needing long-term, sophisticated monitoring solutions.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
OP5 Monitor is noted for its lower setup costs, making it an economical choice, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring tends to require a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced analytical capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
OP5 Monitor is noted for its lower setup costs, making it an economical choice, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring tends to require a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced analytical capabilities.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
NetApp Cloud Insights
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers detailed monitoring and end-to-end visibility but comes at a higher cost with complex deployment. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Insights excels in multi-vendor integration and affordability, ideal for users focusing on resource optimization and cost-effective deployments.
Download NetApp Cloud Insights vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has a higher setup cost compared to NetApp Cloud Insights, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This cost difference highlights a key consideration for organizations evaluating these infrastructure monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has a higher setup cost compared to NetApp Cloud Insights, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. This cost difference highlights a key consideration for organizations evaluating these infrastructure monitoring solutions.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
Loom Systems attracts those seeking straightforward pricing and accessible support. In comparison, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring appeals to users valuing extensive real-time observability and machine learning. A tech buyer might choose Loom for simplicity or Splunk for comprehensive features despite higher costs.
Download Loom Systems vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report
Loom Systems offers lower setup costs compared to Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, which may result in upfront affordability differences. In contrast, setup costs for Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring might be justified by its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Loom Systems offers lower setup costs compared to Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, which may result in upfront affordability differences. In contrast, setup costs for Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring might be justified by its comprehensive feature set.

Related categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Cloud Monitoring Software
Container Management