Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LiveAction LiveNX vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring comparison

BlueCat and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. BlueCat is ranked #55 with an average rating of 6.5, while Splunk is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. BlueCat holds a 0.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
LiveAction LiveNX
Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews
  • 633 Views
  • 487 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
Splunk Infrastructure Monit...
Read 32 Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reviews
  • 1,368 Views
  • 735 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

LiveAction LiveNX and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring compete in network performance management and monitoring. LiveNX stands out in pricing and support, while Splunk's robust feature set offers superior long-term value.

Features: LiveNX offers in-depth network visualization, advanced analytics for real-time insights, and a user-friendly interface. Splunk provides extensive integration capabilities, powerful data analysis tools, and robust alerting systems, making it suitable for comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could enhance its integration capabilities, expand its data analysis features, and improve its alerting systems. Splunk could simplify its deployment process, reduce its pricing for wider accessibility, and enhance its user interface for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX typically offers a straightforward deployment process with clear setup instructions and helpful customer support. Splunk involves a more complex deployment process due to its robust capabilities but offers dedicated support to assist organizations during setup and maintenance challenges.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX offers competitive pricing with a lower initial setup cost, potentially providing quicker ROI for organizations looking for cost-effective network management solutions. Splunk requires a higher initial investment but delivers more value in the long run through its extensive feature set, attracting enterprises seeking to maximize infrastructure monitoring efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,095 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
55th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (60th)
Splunk Infrastructure Monit...
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (11th), Container Management (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Doshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support
Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.
Read full review
Nagendra Nekkala. - PeerSpot reviewer
Is easy to use, provides great visibility, and reduces our resolution time
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is easy to use. It helps us quickly analyze how our infrastructure is performing across various services. It helps with proper log management, allowing us to monitor our systems and analyze log data regularly. It also provides security operations capabilities for monitoring system health and ensuring uptime. We noticed these benefits immediately. Our operational efficiency has been increased. It has improved our system health by monitoring the performance of data on servers, virtual machines, and containers, along with overall background processes. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides end-to-end visibility into our cloud-native environment. This is crucial because any data corruption can impact all the information we've deployed. It also aids in log management, offering parameters that extend its functionality as a comprehensive monitoring tool for CPU, memory usage, and network traffic. It has helped reduce our mean time to detect by four hours.Our mean time to resolution has been reduced by two hours. By providing access to all our network parameters, it simplifies log ingestion through streamlined calculations. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides us with faster and more comprehensive insights into our infrastructure, allowing us to focus on critical business initiatives. We saw the time to value immediately after deploying Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."
"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."
"The product has a very good graphical interface."
"Its analytical capability is really good."
"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."
"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."
"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."
"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."
"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."
"The most valuable feature in this solution is the log searching."
"The product retains a lot of log data for subsequent analysis."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the data integration."
"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"Splunk has drawn our attention to how the network is running. If there are alarms on things that are not functioning, it gives us early warning on problems that could arise."
"The solution monitors attacks or unauthorized access to the information we want to protect."
"The tool is efficient in collecting, monitoring and evaluating logs."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring pros
 

Cons

"They need to create a more simplified UI."
"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."
"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."
"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."
"The only downside to this software is the price."
"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."
"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."
"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."
"The end-to-end visibility is lacking because Splunk cannot directly monitor network devices."
"The product collects a lot of data but it does not assure that it collects all of it."
"The cost needs to be re-examined. It's extremely expensive to run. It's also expensive to expand. That's the number one complaint all of my customers have when it comes to Splunk. It's way too expensive compared to other solutions."
"Splunk would be better if some tools were integrated to be able to take action on security or network concerns."
"In the next release, I would like to see more integration with other solutions."
"This solution is difficult to configure and the instructions are complex."
"We still use Splunk Enterprise licensing. A lot of the newer features go into Splunk Cloud before Enterprise. We're not looking to switch our licensing over, so we're falling behind on the newer features."
"The solution's machine learning deployment is hard and should be made user-friendly."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."
"It's very expensive."
"We use the free version."
"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."
"The solution's pricing is costly."
"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."
"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."
"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."
"This is an expensive solution."
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."
"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?
The product has a very good graphical interface.
See all answers
What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?
The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?
Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
The vibrant dashboards are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive. Till ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?
We never had any issues when it comes to the type of use cases we are using it for. We did not need more advancement on it, but I know that, in general, everything can be updated. There are tiny li...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 24% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 14% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 10% of the time
Meraki Dashboard vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
Meraki Dashboard vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 7% of the time
LiveSP vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
LiveSP vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 7% of the time
More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors
Amazon CloudWatch vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Amazon CloudWatch vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 17% of the time
Rancher Labs vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Rancher Labs vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 15% of the time
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 13% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 8% of the time
Nagios XI vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Logo
Nagios XI vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Compared 7% of the time
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
LiveAction LiveNX
December 2024
LiveAction LiveNX reportDownload LiveAction LiveNX product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
November 2024
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reportDownload Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring product report
 

Also Known As

LiveNX
Splunk Insights for Infrastructure
 

Learn More

Video not available
BlueCat
Splunk
 

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers features including, Instant visualization, real-time actionable alerts, centralized enterprise controls, and scalability. 

Instant visualization

Get fast time to value with over 250+ cloud service integrations and pre-built dashboards out of the box for rapid, full-stack visualization. Autodiscover, break down, group, and explore clouds, services and systems in minutes.

Real-time actionable alerts

Act before infrastructure performance affects end-user experience. Instantly detect and accurately alerts on dynamic thresholds, multiple conditions and complex rules to eliminate alert storms and dramatically reduce MTTD/MTTR.

Centralized, enterprise controls

Answer business-critical questions in context and monitor service-level objectives and indicators instantly. Track custom metrics for business KPIs to token based access and usage controls.

Scale with confidence

Troubleshoot across thousands of microservices, multiple ephemeral deployments, application versions and billions of events. Release better apps faster and drive closed-loop automation for a flawless end-user experience.

 

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology
Entrust Datacard
Buyer's Guide
LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
December 2024
Free Report: LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.