ITRS Geneos vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

ITRS and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #33 with an average rating of 5.0, while Splunk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4. ITRS holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,305 Views
2,798 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 74 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

7,605 Views
4,183 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

ITRS Geneos and Splunk Observability Cloud are major competitors in the field of real-time monitoring and observability solutions. Splunk holds a slight advantage due to its broader cloud-native capabilities and powerful AI integration.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive real-time monitoring with minimal resource usage, flexible customization through plugins, and is a go-to in financial services due to its excellent plug-ins for this industry. Splunk Observability Cloud, on the other hand, excels in end-to-end tracing, cloud-native application support, and features strong visualization and alerting mechanisms. Splunk's standout feature is its AI-powered data analysis, which enhances monitoring efficiency.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos needs to improve its historical reporting capabilities, integration with cloud-native environments, and ease of setup. Enhancing its documentation and mobile access will significantly benefit users. Splunk Observability Cloud could refine its pricing structure, improve integrations, and simplify its user interface, as some users find its search and aggregation functions could be more efficient.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos is better suited for on-premises environments with direct customer support, despite a complex deployment process. Splunk Observability Cloud is versatile, handling various deployment scenarios and offering extensive cloud support. Both provide robust customer service; ITRS is praised for its direct approach, while Splunk's broad support network caters to its wide-ranging features.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is seen as costly but effective, particularly valued in high-stakes environments like finance. Splunk’s pricing can be prohibitive due to its data volume-based model, potentially affecting ROI. However, both offer operational efficiencies and reliability. Pricing should be weighed against the specific needs and scales of usage to determine investment value.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,435 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

68th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

45th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

8th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

6th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 2.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud	2.2%
ITRS Geneos	1.1%
Other	96.7%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Dhananjay Dileep

Senior Software Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Unified monitoring has improved end-to-end visibility and reduced detection time across apps

When we have too many detectors in place for one particular app, such as when I have created 50+ detectors through my account, the entire page becomes a bit loaded when creating the 51st detector, feeling heavy and taking time to load. Additionally, it throws random errors; for example, when we try to save one detector, it might throw some random error which is not even related, with something else being wrong, not that particular error, but the underlying root cause might be different. Sometimes the error is just "some problem occurred," and we are not able to point out what the real cause is. This mainly happens when we have too many detectors or too many alerts in place rather than a standard number. One more thing is in the alert rules; if we have a main general alert, and instead of creating a new detector, we are adding a new rule under one detector, when the number of rules also increases, such as when we have 10 or 15 rules under one generic detector, that again creates the same kind of problem, taking some time to save that particular newly added rule, and it might not save at times, just keeps on spinning. Those are the two drawbacks which I spotted recently; other than that, everything looks perfect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

"Custom script toolkits"

"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."

"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."

"ITRS can define rules to alert when certain parameters that you monitor breach a threshold. Rules can be configured to fire recovery actions automatically to clear the alert"

"The ability to logically normalize data gathered from multiple types of sources via pre-built plugins is extremely powerful. This functionality, coupled with the ability to import custom data via the Toolkit plugin allows Geneos to be leveraged to monitor every system in the enterprise."

"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"The tool's stability is great."

"The features are pretty much ready out of the box."

"The best feature of this product is the latency and processing of all the telemetry that is being received, which gives full visibility at the right time."

"Customer service and technical support respond very quickly."

"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

"The feature I appreciate the most about Splunk Observability Cloud is Synthetic Monitoring."

"We haven't really experienced any glitches or bugs."

"I manage six tools, but Splunk Observability Cloud is one of my favorites, and I aspire to build my career specializing in it because it has great features, more attention in the market, and is a relatively new tool with promising growth."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages."

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

"One thing that could be improved in terms of rapid scaling would be more ability to clone aspects of an implementation. It seems like there are opportunities in this area, where we have repetitive tasks to do when it comes to implementing things on new servers or on new gateways. It would be great if there was an easy way to clone something that had already been done."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."

"The cost needs to be re-examined. It's extremely expensive to run. It's also expensive to expand. That's the number one complaint all of my customers have when it comes to Splunk. It's way too expensive compared to other solutions."

"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."

"Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved in terms of integrations with more technical add-ons, such as Zoom."

"There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available."

"The integrations need to be improved for Splunk Observability Cloud."

"Splunk APM should include a better correlation between resources and infrastructure monitoring."

"The solution's machine learning deployment is hard and should be made user-friendly."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"The price of Splunk APM is less than some of its competitors."

"The solution's pricing is costly."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It is expensive."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

71%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 6% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

January 2026

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

December 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

Geneos

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Network Monitoring Software vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.