ITRS Geneos vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

ITRS and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0, while Splunk is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6. ITRS holds a 1.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,532 Views
1,999 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 50 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

1,960 Views
1,160 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 6, 2025

ITRS Geneos and Splunk Observability Cloud are both leaders in the real-time monitoring category. While Geneos excels in financial sector-specific features, Splunk holds an edge with cloud integration and comprehensive analytics.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, and integrates well with existing scripts for financial systems. Splunk Observability Cloud supports seamless integration across cloud platforms, enables advanced analytics for data from multiple sources, and provides intuitive visual dashboards.

Room for Improvement: Users of ITRS Geneos seek enhancements in cloud integration, historical data analysis, and dashboard flexibility. Splunk Observability Cloud users note its high cost, complex initial setup, and desire for simplified microservices scaling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos is primarily an on-premises solution known for its strong customer service, though it has a steep initial learning curve. Splunk Observability Cloud is versatile with diverse deployments, praised for its customer service but requires a thorough deployment process due to its complexity.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is expensive yet valuable for its feature-rich monitoring, notably in reducing downtime. Splunk Observability Cloud, while costly, offers a flexible licensing model with perceived ROI in handling large-scale environments efficiently.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

28th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (46th)

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (9th), Container Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I always appreciate Geneos's stability and ease of use."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."

"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"

"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."

"The remarkable feature of Geneos is the dashboard. Geneos' flexible dashboard sets it apart from other monitoring tools. Other solutions have limitations in their dashboard design and can't be customized as much. The Geneos dashboard allows unlimited creativity."

"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"It has been beneficial for our IT infrastructure."

"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."

"Great monitoring of network devices."

"The data collection from our VMs, containers, databases, and backend components is valuable."

"Splunk APM helps us to find errors immediately and resolve them."

"The most beneficial aspect of Splunk APM is the ATM, which is the map displaying the inbound and outbound relationships of the microservices, as well as the traffic between these dependencies. This feature provides us with valuable insights and helps us understand the interactions between different microservices."

"The most valuable features are troubleshooting and optimizing application performance."

"The features are pretty much ready out of the box."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"ITRS have started to make some major changes that we haven't taken on board yet, in the creation of dashboards and more visibility of the metrics that we collect. At the moment, that's something that's lacking, but I know they have addressed it. Still, it’s not that easy to create stuff to help with visibility and dashboarding in Geneos."

"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."

"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."

"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."

"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages."

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."

"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"Splunk would be better if some tools were integrated to be able to take action on security or network concerns."

"We currently lack log analysis capabilities in Splunk APM."

"The security could be better."

"A wide variety of logging makes log onboarding difficult."

"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."

"The cost needs to be re-examined. It's extremely expensive to run. It's also expensive to expand. That's the number one complaint all of my customers have when it comes to Splunk. It's way too expensive compared to other solutions."

"It's a bit difficult to use. It takes some time to get into it and to get it to do what you would like it to do. It is not straightforward to use it."

"They can improve the flow system and the keyword language. It has predefined keywords, but they can be improved."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

"Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

77%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available. We sometimes encountered issues in setting up alerts. The custom detector could be m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The main purpose of using Splunk APM is to optimize our application. We use Splunk APM primarily to understand how the application works, how it uses resources, and its response time in connection ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 24% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 17% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Prometheus Group vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Observability vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 2% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

March 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

March 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

Geneos

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Splunk Observability Cloud combines log search, data integration, and dashboards for seamless monitoring, enhancing infrastructure visibility and security. Its cloud integration and scalability support diverse environments, improving operational efficiency.

Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring tools with user-friendly interfaces, enabling end-to-end infrastructure visibility. Its real-time alerting and predictive capabilities enhance security monitoring, while centralized dashboards provide cross-platform visibility. Users benefit from fast data integration and extensive insights into application performance. Despite its advantages, improvements could be made in integration with other tools, data reliability, scalability, and cost management. Users face challenges in configuration complexity and require better automation and endpoint protection features. Enhancing AI integration, alerts, and adaptation for high-throughput services could further improve usability.

What are the key features of Splunk Observability Cloud?

Log Search: Efficiently search and analyze log data for enhanced insights.
Data Integration: Fast integration across platforms for comprehensive visibility.
Custom Dashboards: Powerful and adaptable dashboards for real-time monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Seamless integration with cloud services for scalable solutions.
Application Performance Monitoring: Advanced tools for improving application performance.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Infrastructure Monitoring: Improved visibility and monitoring across infrastructure components.
Operational Efficiency: Enhancements in data analysis lead to efficient operations.
Business Resilience: Supports adaptability and swift responses to changing needs.
Security Management: Enhances threat identification and response through real-time alerts.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting compliance and auditing requirements effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for application performance monitoring and infrastructure metrics. Its ability to track incidents and analyze machine data benefits network infrastructure, while distributed tracing and log analysis aid in tackling security threats. Organizations often integrate it for compliance and auditing purposes, enhancing visibility into network traffic and optimizing performance.

Splunk

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

February 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.