Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ITRS Geneos Logo

Top 10 ITRS Geneos Alternatives

Vendor: ITRS
4.1 out of 5
1,856 followers
Post review

Top ITRS Geneos Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ITRS Geneos based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

ITRS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ITRS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers comprehensive AI-driven capabilities, auto-discovery, and full-stack monitoring. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring for the financial sector. Users favor Dynatrace for advanced analytics, while ITRS Geneos is preferred for specialized financial features and cost-effectiveness in large-scale deployments.
Download Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos Report
Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which is known for more affordable installation fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which is known for more affordable installation fees.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog excels in support and competitive pricing, with comprehensive integration and customizable dashboards, making it ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers detailed analytics and superior data granularity, justifying its higher cost for robust, long-term performance.
Download Datadog vs. ITRS Geneos Report
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost, while ITRS Geneos requires a more complex investment. Datadog's simpler pricing structure is evident compared to ITRS Geneos's detailed cost outline.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost, while ITRS Geneos requires a more complex investment. Datadog's simpler pricing structure is evident compared to ITRS Geneos's detailed cost outline.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
Zabbix offers cost-effective open-source flexibility and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides robust features, extensive integration options, and advanced analytics. Zabbix is praised for straightforward deployment, while ITRS Geneos excels in thorough customer service and tailored enterprise functionalities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix incurs no initial setup costs, while ITRS Geneos has a higher setup expense. Zabbix is more cost-effective during installation, contrasting with ITRS Geneos, which may burden budgets upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix incurs no initial setup costs, while ITRS Geneos has a higher setup expense. Zabbix is more cost-effective during installation, contrasting with ITRS Geneos, which may burden budgets upfront.
ITRS Geneos Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos is known for real-time monitoring and customizable dashboards, making it suitable for detailed, on-premise monitoring needs. In comparison, New Relic's advanced analytics and broad integrations cater to users needing extensive cloud-based monitoring solutions. ITRS Geneos excels in customer service, while New Relic offers efficient deployment.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas New Relic's setup cost is lower, appealing to smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas New Relic's setup cost is lower, appealing to smaller businesses.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers competitive pricing and robust customer support in IT monitoring, praised for real-time performance and customization. In comparison, Azure Monitor’s superior features, including scalability and Azure service integration, justify its higher cost, making it an appealing choice for comprehensive cloud ecosystems.
Download Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
ITRS Geneos Logo
AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
AppDynamics excels with ease of use, intuitive dashboards, and real-time transaction insights. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers powerful infrastructure monitoring and customizable alerting. A tech buyer might choose AppDynamics for straightforward implementation, while ITRS Geneos provides flexibility and detailed analytics for deeper insights.
Download AppDynamics vs. ITRS Geneos Report
AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while ITRS Geneos is more budget-friendly in terms of deployment. AppDynamics offers a comprehensive feature set, whereas ITRS Geneos focuses on essential monitoring capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while ITRS Geneos is more budget-friendly in terms of deployment. AppDynamics offers a comprehensive feature set, whereas ITRS Geneos focuses on essential monitoring capabilities.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive monitoring and reliable performance, ideal for detailed analytics and rapid insights. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in customization and integration, making it suitable for environments requiring large dataset handling and flexible visualization. Each solution meets diverse technical monitoring needs.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos excels in enterprise-level monitoring, ideal for financial market data and trading systems. In comparison, Grafana stands out with its open-source, customizable visualizations. ITRS Geneos provides robust customer service, while Grafana offers easier deployment and lower costs. Both deliver strong ROI and unique advantages.
Download Grafana vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while Grafana offers a considerably lower expense for initial setup. The significant difference in upfront costs reflects their differing approaches to budget and infrastructure management.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while Grafana offers a considerably lower expense for initial setup. The significant difference in upfront costs reflects their differing approaches to budget and infrastructure management.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos is recognized for its comprehensive capabilities and customizable alerts, making it valuable for robust monitoring. In comparison, Prometheus stands out for advanced data querying and scalability, appealing to those handling dynamic environments. Prometheus's open-source nature contrasts ITRS Geneos's higher pricing and dedicated support.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Prometheus Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost, while Prometheus offers a more affordable initial setup for users. The distinction in setup costs may significantly impact budget considerations for potential customers.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost, while Prometheus offers a more affordable initial setup for users. The distinction in setup costs may significantly impact budget considerations for potential customers.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5

ITRS Geneos excels in providing reliable analytics for financial services. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers broader features and ease of use. ITRS Geneos handles large data volumes effectively, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provides user-friendly dashboards and integration with other tools.

Download ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report
ITRS Geneos has a lower initial setup cost, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor requires a higher investment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a lower initial setup cost, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor requires a higher investment upfront.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management provides comprehensive monitoring and predictive analytics, focusing on scalability and complexity reduction. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring and customization but can improve in ease of setup and documentation. Both deliver valuable ROI, justifying their costs.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. ITRS Geneos Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which tends to be more expensive upfront. This price difference is significant for organizations considering initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which tends to be more expensive upfront. This price difference is significant for organizations considering initial investment.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Instana Dynamic APM
3.8 out of 5

ITRS Geneos is noted for its real-time monitoring and customization, alongside a user-friendly deployment process and strong customer service. In comparison, Instana Dynamic APM is recognized for its automatic root cause analysis and continuous discovery but may require more initial configuration efforts and has higher costs.

Download ITRS Geneos vs. Instana Dynamic APM Report
ITRS Geneos setup cost is relatively high, while Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos setup cost is relatively high, while Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Apica
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Apica
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive monitoring for complex environments with extensive integrations and real-time analytics. In comparison, Apica provides a user-friendly setup with strong synthetic monitoring. ITRS Geneos benefits large enterprises with high-cost, deep infrastructure visibility, while Apica provides cost-effective solutions for efficient monitoring features.
Download Apica vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, whereas Apica offers a more affordable initial setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, whereas Apica offers a more affordable initial setup option.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
3.3 out of 5
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers reliable monitoring capabilities and sophisticated alerting, making it a cost-effective choice with strong customer support. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides advanced configurability and in-depth analytics, justifying its higher price with a faster deployment process and superior value.
Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. ITRS Geneos Report
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
AppDynamics Database Monitoring
4.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, and thorough alerting mechanisms. In comparison, AppDynamics Database Monitoring provides deep insights, automated root cause analysis, and seamless integration with other AppDynamics tools. ITRS Geneos is known for straightforward deployment, while AppDynamics is praised for its comprehensive feature set.
Download AppDynamics Database Monitoring vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while AppDynamics Database Monitoring offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while AppDynamics Database Monitoring offers a more affordable setup.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos excels in monitoring and alerting for financial services. In comparison, AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring offers deep application performance insights and broader industry functionalities. ITRS Geneos could improve dashboard customization, while AppDynamics might enhance backend performance and ease of complex configurations.
Download AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring; however, the latter provides a more streamlined initial setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring; however, the latter provides a more streamlined initial setup process.
ITRS Geneos Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
AlertSite is praised for its intuitive setup and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers detailed analytics and customizability. AlertSite could improve reporting, while ITRS Geneos needs easier navigation. Affordable AlertSite offers quick ROI, whereas ITRS Geneos's advanced features justify its higher cost.
Download AlertSite vs. ITRS Geneos Report
AlertSite has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which may influence total onboarding expenses. While AlertSite offers a more economical start, ITRS Geneos might provide more advanced initial configurations at a higher initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
AlertSite has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which may influence total onboarding expenses. While AlertSite offers a more economical start, ITRS Geneos might provide more advanced initial configurations at a higher initial cost.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring