Azure Monitor vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Microsoft and ITRS are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while ITRS is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 7.5% mindshare in APM, compared to ITRS’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 54 Azure Monitor reviews

14,357 Views
12,750 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,532 Views
1,999 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Both ITRS Geneos and Azure Monitor are competing products in the system monitoring space. Azure Monitor tends to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, making it worth the higher price despite ITRS Geneos having specific capabilities.

Features: ITRS Geneos is valued for its ability to monitor complex IT infrastructure with precision, detailed performance tracking, and real-time alerting. Azure Monitor is praised for its extensive integration capabilities, holistic monitoring approach, and broad feature set suitable for diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Users of ITRS Geneos express a need for better scalability, easier configuration options, and more intuitive user interface. Users of Azure Monitor indicate the need for more intuitive alerting, improved log management, and enhancements in user experience to match Geneos' ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos deployment reviews highlight a streamlined but intricate process needing technical expertise. Customer service is responsive and knowledgeable. Azure Monitor deployment is relatively straightforward but may need fine-tuning post-deployment. Azure's customer service is robust but seen as less personalized compared to ITRS Geneos. Azure Monitor offers easier deployment, while ITRS Geneos provides more personalized support.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos users find the setup cost quite high, but they acknowledge the return on investment due to its specialized capabilities. Azure Monitor has a mixed response regarding setup costs but generally favorable ROI due to its comprehensive features. Despite ITRS Geneos being more expensive, the ROI aligns closely with Azure Monitor, making them comparable in value.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (5th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (46th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 7.5%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect at LogicEra

Monthly and weekly resource monitoring has improved efficiency

Azure Monitor can improve by adding some kind of storage for logs. I can get the runtime logs alone, yet if Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel. If they do that, and if they can integrate a little pricing adjustment, it will be profitable for the Microsoft tool.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tools for logs and metrics are pretty good and easy to use."

"The security and support are good."

"Azure Monitor is really just a source for Dynatrace. It's just collecting data and monitoring the environment and the infrastructure. It is fairly good at that."

"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."

"You can scale the product."

"In the last company where I worked about a year ago, it looked very simple."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."

"Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment."

More Azure Monitor pros

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"The filtering in the Active Console is exceptional. Depending on the user base, some people don't want to see server-level errors, so we have filters set up in the Managed Entities view, which allow us to filter out things that certain groups don't want to see, while allowing them to see other things. It's a great real-time monitoring solution. And you can draw graphs immediately, right from the Active Console, whether they're current graphs or historical graphs."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

"The solution is used across the entire investment banking division, covering environments such as electronic trading, algo-trading, fixed income, FX, etc. It monitors that environment and enables a bank to significantly reduce down time. Although hard to measure, since implementation, we have probably seen some increased stability because of it and we have definitely seen teams a lot more aware of their environment. Consequently, we can be more proactive in challenging and improving previously undetected weaknesses."

"The remarkable feature of Geneos is the dashboard. Geneos' flexible dashboard sets it apart from other monitoring tools. Other solutions have limitations in their dashboard design and can't be customized as much. The Geneos dashboard allows unlimited creativity."

"The built-in plug-ins allow administrators to easily configure monitoring components for market data systems such as Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform and SRLabs Wombat (formerly NYSE)."

"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"have used multiple products like Webex and PRTG. Some features could be added. Azure Monitor should add SMS and APIs. We have very limited access to Azure Monitor. I usually get alerts on my phone when they are integrated with Slack. I am not always available, but my team is. Sometimes, I am traveling and don't have access to my email, but I have Slack and other third-party projects that send me instant messages if a sensor goes down."

"What I feel is when I open a screen of Azure, some places are very complex to navigate to. It is not very user-friendly when it comes to accessing certain sections."

"The onboarding process of certain assets and the overall UI can be improved in Azure Monitor"

"Azure Monitor's integration with applications could be improved."

"The solution needs better monitoring. It requires better log controls."

"The process of implementation needs to be easier."

"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."

"The price could be lower but it is not a must."

More Azure Monitor cons

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."

"I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself."

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."

"ITRS have started to make some major changes that we haven't taken on board yet, in the creation of dashboards and more visibility of the metrics that we collect. At the moment, that's something that's lacking, but I know they have addressed it. Still, it’s not that easy to create stuff to help with visibility and dashboarding in Geneos."

"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."

"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."

"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."

"Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."

"It's a costly solution"

"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."

"Since we are using the basic set, it is more cost-effective compared to other third-party APM solutions."

"The licensing is a monthly fee."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

76%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

See all answers

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 24% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 17% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Prometheus Group vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

April 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

No data available

Geneos

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.