Make vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

Make and VMware are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Make is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0, while VMware is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Make holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to VMware’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Make users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Make

Read 2 Make reviews

287 Views
199 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

vCenter Orchestrator

Read 50 vCenter Orchestrator reviews

165 Views
127 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Make

vCenter Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

vCenter Orchestrator and Make are competitive automation tools tailored for different environments, with vCenter Orchestrator holding the advantage in enterprise integration due to its specialization within VMware ecosystems, while Make is more versatile for flexible automation solutions.

Features: vCenter Orchestrator offers tight integration with VMware environments, comprehensive automation of IT processes, and sophisticated workflow creation tools. Make provides user-friendly workflow automation, a wide array of integrations with various applications, and simplicity in connecting apps and services. The distinction is in vCenter Orchestrator's focus on enterprise IT automation, whereas Make excels in connectivity and ease of use across diverse business tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: vCenter Orchestrator integrates seamlessly with VMware systems, supported by robust customer service tailored for enterprise setups. Make's cloud-based deployment is noted for its minimal setup requirements and seamless integration capabilities, with responsive customer service, making it suitable for varied platform deployment.

Pricing and ROI: vCenter Orchestrator has a higher setup cost but provides strong ROI in VMware-centric environments due to its specialized features. Make's lower initial investment delivers significant ROI through its flexible pricing and adaptability, appealing to small to medium-sized businesses looking for cost-to-performance effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,960 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

30th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

vCenter Orchestrator

Ranking in Process Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Make is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vCenter Orchestrator is 0.2%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

David Villota

EMEA Hosting Engineer at Yanfeng Automotive

Provides automatic monitoring capabilities that save time for users

In my company's IT environment, we use the tool to deploy production environments for products, including live manufacturing systems. The product improves my company's IT automation processes since we can use fewer resources currently. In my company, we need to spend less time considering that vCenter Orchestrator monitors everything. In general, we don't have to be present in our company to do active monitoring. Automatic monitoring is available for everything with vCenter Orchestrator, so we have proactive alerts in our company. The most valuable feature of the product in streamlining our company's workflow stems from the fact that we need to spend fewer resources and less time in general. Our company can spend time on more effective tasks like working with the plans to improve processes and so on, instead of taking care of the systems. The benefits of the product's integration capabilities were useful for HPE. My company has HPE infrastructure, and we are keen to integrate everything into the host, VMware ESXi. It is really important to have an easy integration method that allows for everything to be installed easily in a matter of minutes. I was not involved in the product's setup process. My colleague took care of the product's setup process. From what I know, I can say that the product's setup phase was straightforward. Some custom setups were to be done manually in the tool, but everything was well documented. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. One of the benefits of the product is that it is a low-cost and stable solution that offers a lot of resources. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

"The hardware abstraction layer, being able to make the VMs portable when moving to a different platform or over a WAN."

"The most valuable feature for us is the performance stability of vCenter Orchestrator, especially in complex situations, making it excellent for managing virtual machines."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"I like the tool's DNS feature."

"The most valuable feature is workflow automation."

"The most valuable feature is that this solution is complete, and you don't need any add-ons."

"Because of the central management, the scripting engine and workflow engine are integrated with VMware without any burden to integrate different products."

"The solution was easy to install."

More vCenter Orchestrator pros

Cons

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"The interface could be improved to bring greater user-friendliness and ease of use."

"The solution’s pricing and integration could be improved."

"I liked the previous client better than the current web client of vCenter Orchestrator, though my colleagues like the client now. The technical support for vCenter Orchestrator needs improvement."

"After the change from perpetual licensing to subscriptions, the cost model changed."

"I did not do the initial setup. However, it was complex at the beginning."

"The solution's price could be cheaper."

"Enhancing the platform's setup process intuitiveness and offering more flexible pricing options could further improve its accessibility across different company sizes."

"The scalability option provided by the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

More vCenter Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

"The product is expensive."

"We pay a yearly fee, based on our entries."

"This solution is expensive and the licensing is more attractive for Haveri."

"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. We pay for the license and then we pay the support every year."

"vCenter Orchestrator could be more affordable."

"The licensing module is somewhat complex. Calculating the cost is complicated. Many of our clients are unclear about the billing system and the traffic metering."

"vCenter Orchestrator is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product price a seven to eight out of ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

More vCenter Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Make is cheaper than Zapier.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

We use Make to manipulate data, cut the numbers, take this line of code, and translate it to another line of code. SaaS products use XML, and other products use JSON. You need to translate to commu...

See all answers

What do you like most about vCenter Orchestrator?

The stability of the product is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vCenter Orchestrator?

We're running a low-profile budget. This is not our main focus on investment technology, so we're trying to reduce costs due to the change from perpetual to subscription licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vCenter Orchestrator?

After the change from perpetual licensing to subscriptions, the cost model changed. We are considering alternatives since we lost the perpetual aspect, and support is changing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Make

Compared 68% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 32% of the time

More Make Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 55% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 22% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 11% of the time

More vCenter Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

March 2025

Download Make product report

Buyer's Guide

vCenter Orchestrator

March 2025

Download vCenter Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

Integromat

No data available

Overview

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.

VMware

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Beiersdorf Shared Services

Buyer's Guide

Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator

April 2025

Free Report: Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Make vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.