Top 10 Make Alternatives

Name: Make
Brand: Make
Rating: 3.7 (3 reviews)

Vendor: Make

3.7 out of 5

3 reviews
80% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Make Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Make based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Appian, and Pega Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Make surpasses its competitors by offering a user-friendly interface, robust automation capabilities, and seamless integration with countless applications, enhancing productivity and efficiency for users seeking advanced workflow management in various industries.

Make Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Make, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda excels in complex workflow capabilities, ideal for enterprises requiring advanced process management. In comparison, Make's intuitive automation and ease of integration attract those seeking simplicity. Camunda offers cost-effective solutions, while Make might appeal with quick ROI through user-friendly features despite higher initial costs.

Download Camunda vs. Make Report

Pricing

Camunda's setup cost is transparent and aligns with its enterprise focus, while Make offers affordable entry pricing appealing to small businesses, highlighting a cost-effective alternative.

View comparison

Pricing

Camunda's setup cost is transparent and aligns with its enterprise focus, while Make offers affordable entry pricing appealing to small businesses, highlighting a cost-effective alternative.

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian provides cost-effective low-code development and superior customer support, making it ideal for easy deployment. In comparison, Make offers advanced automation and customizable workflows, appealing to enterprises needing complex process automation, despite potentially higher setup costs and less comprehensive customer service.

Download Appian vs. Make Report

Pricing

Appian requires an upfront setup cost, while Make does not charge any initial fees, making Make a cost-effective option for startups.

View comparison

Pricing

Appian requires an upfront setup cost, while Make does not charge any initial fees, making Make a cost-effective option for startups.

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform emphasizes comprehensive analytics and scalability, targeting enterprise solutions. In comparison, Make offers a drag-and-drop interface with flexible workflows, appealing to diverse users. Pega focuses on long-term value, while Make attracts smaller businesses with its cost-effective, user-friendly setup.

Download Make vs. Pega Platform Report

Pricing

Pega Platform offers a lower setup cost than Make, providing a more cost-effective initial investment, while Make focuses on a different pricing model that may be better suited for users seeking variable setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Temporal

4.3 out of 5

Temporal

4.3 out of 5

Make is attractive to budget-conscious buyers with its affordable pricing and intuitive deployment. In comparison, Temporal targets businesses needing high scalability and resilience, justifying its higher investment through advanced features and exceptional support suited for complex implementations.

Download Make vs. Temporal Report

Pricing

Make offers a low setup cost, while Temporal requires a more significant investment upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Make offers a low setup cost, while Temporal requires a more significant investment upfront.

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex offers robust process mapping and integration options for enterprises focused on in-depth automation. In comparison, Make provides a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, appealing to tech buyers seeking ease of use and quick deployment with flexible application connectors.

Download Make vs. Nintex Process Platform Report

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform incurs a notable setup cost upfront, whereas Make offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting the cost-effectiveness difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform incurs a notable setup cost upfront, whereas Make offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting the cost-effectiveness difference between the two solutions.

Tray.io

1 out of 5

Tray.io

1 out of 5

Tray.io's advanced automation and flexible pricing attract businesses seeking complex workflows. In comparison, Make's user-friendly drag-and-drop interface appeals to non-technical users looking for simplicity. Tray.io excels in seamless deployment and customer support, while Make emphasizes intuitive design and extensive functionalities.

Pricing

Tray.io offers a lower setup cost compared to Make, distinguishing a key financial advantage for businesses evaluating initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Tray.io offers a lower setup cost compared to Make, distinguishing a key financial advantage for businesses evaluating initial investment.

Related categories

Process Automation

AI Software Development

Business Process Design