Camunda vs Make comparison

Camunda and Make are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Make is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0. Camunda holds a 29.1% mindshare in PA, compared to Make’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Make users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 76 Camunda reviews

16,637 Views
10,727 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Make

Read 2 Make reviews

250 Views
174 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Camunda

Make

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Camunda and Make are products in the business process management and workflow automation category. Make seems to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly approach and powerful automation capabilities.

Features: Camunda provides an open-source nature, high scalability, and extensive customization options, making it suitable for large enterprises. Make offers an intuitive drag-and-drop interface, extensive integration capabilities, and powerful automation solutions for user-friendly experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports robust deployment for large-scale implementations, requiring technical expertise. Make simplifies deployment with a cloud-based model and offers customer service that is fast and accessible, enhancing satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda provides flexible pricing intended for enterprises, offering higher ROI through open-source options but with potentially higher setup costs. Make offers a straightforward pricing model, resulting in quicker ROI with lower initial costs, ideal for small to medium-sized businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. Make Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Make

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

29th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 29.1%, up from 27.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Peter Broucke

Enterprise Architect at Proximus

Support is good (even the basic one), documentation is readily available and matches the need for agile development

Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow. I know they're working on that or at least communicating about it. They already have versions to run on the cloud, so they've tackled that. We're looking at what they will come up with otherwise. As long as the product gets enough traction and evolves, we're happy. With open source, you can monitor what's happening. If the product is being left by many customers, that's a sign. We're also users of Camunda, and you can watch one of our guides' presentations in the States about one of our implementations. Our focus now is on developing service management and DMN APIs for the platform. AI is something we take into consideration, but we'll see what additional benefits it could bring and how to interconnect it with our data or AI engineering.

Read full review

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Camunda serves as an automation library and provides lightweight deployment to the cloud."

"The architectural part of Camunda for workflow design is highly valuable, especially the Camunda Modeler, which allows quick process design and implementation."

"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."

"The use of Java is a big plus for our intern developers, and Camunda scales well, as many of our departments are already using it in production with dedicated teams."

"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."

"It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."

"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."

"The platform's approach to BPMN modeling is straightforward and versatile, making it easy to adopt and use effectively."

More Camunda pros

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

Cons

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

"An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old."

"The product does not have a dictionary."

"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."

"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."

More Camunda cons

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."

"We're using the open-source version for now."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"We use the free version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Make is cheaper than Zapier.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

We use Make to manipulate data, cut the numbers, take this line of code, and translate it to another line of code. SaaS products use XML, and other products use JSON. You need to translate to commu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 14% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bonita vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Appian vs Make

Compared 34% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

December 2024

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

December 2024

Download Make product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

Integromat

Learn More

Video not available

Camunda

Make

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Make

December 2024

Free Report: Camunda vs. Make

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. Make report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.