Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Camunda Logo

Top 10 Camunda Alternatives

Vendor: Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
3,554 followers
Post review

Top Camunda Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Camunda based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP Signavio Process Manager, and Visio. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Camunda surpasses its competitors by offering a robust open-source platform for process automation, supporting BPMN, DMN, and CMMN standards, enabling seamless integration and real-time decision-making capabilities, which enhance productivity and process management efficiency.

Camunda Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Camunda, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
3.9 out of 5
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect supports UML 2, ArchiMate, and TOGAF, appealing for architecture modeling and document generation. In comparison, Camunda excels in BPMN, DMN, and CMMN standards, favored for process automation and open-source accessibility, offering ease in executing workflows.
Download Camunda vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Report
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect has a lower setup cost compared to Camunda, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Camunda may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its focus on offering enterprise-level process management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect has a lower setup cost compared to Camunda, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Camunda may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its focus on offering enterprise-level process management capabilities.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager
4.1 out of 5
SAP Signavio Process Manager provides user-friendly process modeling with advanced collaboration features. In comparison, Camunda offers flexibility through its open-source platform, catering to technical customization. Signavio emphasizes ease of use, while Camunda is ideal for cost-efficient, adaptable process solutions.
Download Camunda vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report
SAP Signavio Process Manager involves higher initial setup costs compared to Camunda, which offers a more cost-effective setup structure.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Signavio Process Manager involves higher initial setup costs compared to Camunda, which offers a more cost-effective setup structure.
Camunda Logo
Visio
3.9 out of 5
Camunda Logo
Visio
3.9 out of 5
Visio is ideal for seamless integration with Microsoft Office and diverse diagram templates, appealing to those familiar with MS ecosystems. In comparison, Camunda is attractive for its open-source flexibility and enterprise BPM features like process history, benefiting businesses needing robust BPM capabilities without the higher costs.
Download Camunda vs. Visio Report
Visio offers a simple setup with minimal costs, while Camunda requires a more complex and potentially higher-priced setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Visio offers a simple setup with minimal costs, while Camunda requires a more complex and potentially higher-priced setup.
Camunda Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Camunda Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Bizagi offers seamless process modeling and agility, excelling in process documentation and simulation. In comparison, Camunda integrates with microservices and is open-source, providing flexibility. Tech buyers might choose Bizagi for quick deployment, while Camunda appeals with its extensibility and cost-effectiveness.
Download Bizagi vs. Camunda Report
Bizagi has a lower setup cost compared to Camunda, while Camunda offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Bizagi has a lower setup cost compared to Camunda, while Camunda offers a more flexible pricing structure.
Camunda Logo
ARIS BPA
4.1 out of 5
Camunda Logo
ARIS BPA
4.1 out of 5
ARIS BPA offers robust features for detailed business process architecture and SAP integration. In comparison, Camunda specializes in flexible microservice integration and open-source development. ARIS is preferred for large budget enterprises, while Camunda suits those seeking cost-effective, flexible solutions.
Download ARIS BPA vs. Camunda Report
ARIS BPA requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Camunda offers a more accessible and cost-effective implementation option.
View comparison
Pricing
ARIS BPA requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Camunda offers a more accessible and cost-effective implementation option.
Camunda Logo
Visual Paradigm
4.1 out of 5
Camunda Logo
Visual Paradigm
4.1 out of 5
Camunda focuses on workflow execution and API integration, making it suitable for Java application embedding. In comparison, Visual Paradigm supports UML and BPMN, catering to those seeking comprehensive diagram integration and enterprise architecture management, with a more economical tier-based pricing model than Camunda.
Download Camunda vs. Visual Paradigm Report
Camunda has a low setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious teams, while Visual Paradigm may involve higher setup expenses, justifying its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda has a low setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious teams, while Visual Paradigm may involve higher setup expenses, justifying its extensive feature set.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
erwin Data Modeler by Quest
4.3 out of 5
Camunda excels in process flexibility, accommodating non-developers with its ease of business process definition and ample open-source features. In comparison, erwin Data Modeler provides a detailed visual representation for data integration, useful for enterprise-level tasks with comprehensive data modeling capabilities.
Download Camunda vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest Report
Camunda has a low setup cost which makes it appealing to startups, whereas erwin Data Modeler by Quest has a higher initial investment that may be more suitable for larger enterprises with complex data modeling needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda has a low setup cost which makes it appealing to startups, whereas erwin Data Modeler by Quest has a higher initial investment that may be more suitable for larger enterprises with complex data modeling needs.
Camunda Logo
MEGA HOPEX
3.9 out of 5
Camunda Logo
MEGA HOPEX
3.9 out of 5
MEGA HOPEX offers comprehensive IT portfolio management with a focus on business process alignment and architecture, suitable for enterprise needs. In comparison, Camunda provides lightweight, flexible process automation with open-source options, appealing for businesses seeking agile BPM solutions and extensive integrations.
Download Camunda vs. MEGA HOPEX Report
MEGA HOPEX has higher setup costs, focusing on advanced enterprise needs, while Camunda offers a more budget-friendly approach with its streamlined setup, making it more accessible for organizations looking for cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
MEGA HOPEX has higher setup costs, focusing on advanced enterprise needs, while Camunda offers a more budget-friendly approach with its streamlined setup, making it more accessible for organizations looking for cost-effective solutions.
Camunda Logo
IBM Blueworks Live
4.1 out of 5
Camunda Logo
IBM Blueworks Live
4.1 out of 5
IBM Blueworks Live excels in real-time collaboration and centralized process management, making it suitable for businesses seeking efficient cloud-based solutions. In comparison, Camunda provides flexibility and scalability through its open-source model, appealing to organizations with complex BPMN modeling needs.
Download Camunda vs. IBM Blueworks Live Report
IBM Blueworks Live has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Camunda may involve more complexity during implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Blueworks Live has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Camunda may involve more complexity during implementation.
Camunda Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
Camunda Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.
Download Bonita vs. Camunda Report
Bonita features a lower initial setup cost, while Camunda's setup is more expensive, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Bonita features a lower initial setup cost, while Camunda's setup is more expensive, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
Camunda Logo
No Magic MagicDraw
4.2 out of 5
Camunda Logo
No Magic MagicDraw
4.2 out of 5
MagicDraw excels with extensive modeling capabilities supporting UML, SysML, and BPMN integration for thorough analysis. In comparison, Camunda specializes in BPMN-based process automation with flexible deployment options, providing efficient workflow management. Tech buyers might choose MagicDraw for modeling or Camunda for automation flexibility.
Download Camunda vs. No Magic MagicDraw Report
No Magic MagicDraw has a higher setup cost compared to Camunda, making Camunda a more budget-friendly option for initial investment. However, MagicDraw offers complex features which might justify its higher setup pricing for certain users.
View comparison
Pricing
No Magic MagicDraw has a higher setup cost compared to Camunda, making Camunda a more budget-friendly option for initial investment. However, MagicDraw offers complex features which might justify its higher setup pricing for certain users.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
BiZZdesign HoriZZon
3.7 out of 5
Camunda offers flexibility with open-source architecture and customization options, appealing to tech buyers seeking integration support. In comparison, BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides strong enterprise architecture management capabilities, ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive features and excellent customer service in public cloud deployments.
Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. Camunda Report
Camunda has minimal setup costs, while BiZZdesign HoriZZon carries higher initial expenses, offering distinct financial implications for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda has minimal setup costs, while BiZZdesign HoriZZon carries higher initial expenses, offering distinct financial implications for users.
Camunda Logo
ARIS Cloud
3.9 out of 5
Camunda Logo
ARIS Cloud
3.9 out of 5
ARIS Cloud excels in process design and analytics, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and customer support. In comparison, Camunda's strength lies in process automation and integration, offering significant ROI through advanced features for tech buyers ready for a higher initial investment.
Download ARIS Cloud vs. Camunda Report
ARIS Cloud has a one-time setup cost, whereas Camunda offers a lower initial setup with potential additional fees.
View comparison
Pricing
ARIS Cloud has a one-time setup cost, whereas Camunda offers a lower initial setup with potential additional fees.
Camunda Logo
BIC Platform
4.1 out of 5
Camunda Logo
BIC Platform
4.1 out of 5
Camunda offers customization and scalability with its open-source and flexible architecture. In comparison, BIC Platform targets comprehensive features and process visualization. Camunda attracts tech-savvy users, while BIC Platform appeals to those seeking seamless setups and robust support services.
Download BIC Platform vs. Camunda Report
Camunda offers a lower setup cost, while BIC Platform may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda offers a lower setup cost, while BIC Platform may require a higher initial investment.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
4.2 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 emphasizes graphical modeling and user-friendly deployment, appealing to non-technical teams focused on process management. In comparison, Camunda offers an open-source environment with a robust execution engine, suited for developers seeking integration flexibility and automation capabilities.
Download Camunda vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while Camunda is noted for a straightforward setup fee structure, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment between the two process automation solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers a flexible setup cost, while Camunda is noted for a straightforward setup fee structure, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment between the two process automation solutions.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
ARIS Architect and Designer
3.9 out of 5
Camunda appeals to tech buyers with its open-source accessibility, customization, and flexible deployment options. In comparison, ARIS attracts those needing robust enterprise architecture integration and comprehensive modeling capabilities. Both serve distinct needs in BPM solutions, appealing to different business process requirements.
Download ARIS Architect and Designer vs. Camunda Report
Camunda offers a lower setup cost compared to ARIS Architect and Designer, which has a higher setup cost reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda offers a lower setup cost compared to ARIS Architect and Designer, which has a higher setup cost reflecting its comprehensive features.
Camunda Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
4.5 out of 5
Camunda Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
4.5 out of 5

Camunda's open-source core allows adaptable process automation, appealing to those valuing flexibility and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, SS&C Blue Prism offers robust enterprise-level automation capabilities, attracting tech buyers seeking comprehensive features and strong security for complex, large-scale environments.

Camunda offers an affordable setup cost, making it accessible for small to mid-sized implementations, while SS&C Blue Prism's setup cost is higher, reflecting its enterprise-grade capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda offers an affordable setup cost, making it accessible for small to mid-sized implementations, while SS&C Blue Prism's setup cost is higher, reflecting its enterprise-grade capabilities.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
IBM System Architect
3.0 out of 5
IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture tool, that you can use to visualize, analyze, and communicate all aspects of an enterprise architecture by applying industry-standard frameworks, notations, and methods. After you capture and understand an architecture, you can plan and implement its future improvements intelligently.
IBM System Architect has higher setup costs compared to Camunda, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM System Architect has higher setup costs compared to Camunda, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
TIBCO Business Studio
4.0 out of 5
TIBCO Business Studio is a standards-based business process modeling environment that enables business experts and process authors to collaborate to create process models, organization models, data models, forms and pageflow models for deployment to TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM. It is also the common Eclipse-based environment for building composite applications across the entire ActiveMatrix family, including business process management (BPM) and service-oriented architecture (SOA) applications.
TIBCO Business Studio setup cost is higher with more complex features, while Camunda offers a more affordable and straightforward setup.
View comparison
Pricing
TIBCO Business Studio setup cost is higher with more complex features, while Camunda offers a more affordable and straightforward setup.
Camunda Logo
Camunda Logo
Fujitsu Interstage
1 out of 5
Enables companies to model, automate, manage and optimize their business processes.
Fujitsu Interstage has a significant setup cost, whereas Camunda offers a more affordable entry for setting up. This distinction highlights the price gap between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fujitsu Interstage has a significant setup cost, whereas Camunda offers a more affordable entry for setting up. This distinction highlights the price gap between the two solutions.

Related categories

Business Process Design
Business Process Management (BPM)
Process Automation