Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

Camunda and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while OpenText is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. Camunda holds a 16.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

21,608 Views
14,910 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

797 Views
470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Camunda and OpenText Process Automation compete in the process automation space, each with distinct strengths. Camunda has a pricing advantage due to its open-source model, ideal for startups and small enterprises. OpenText is noted for its robust customer support and functionalities, appealing to larger organizations.

Features: Camunda offers open-source flexibility, enabling customization and easy integration across various environments. Its community version supports BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, providing essential workflow capabilities at no cost. OpenText focuses on strong integration capabilities and comprehensive monitoring features, making it suitable for enterprises with complex needs.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its interface and forms designer for better customizability and user-friendliness. It could also improve support for non-Java environments and offer more industry templates. OpenText could improve its user interface and expand mobile compatibility, along with refining its integration framework for better process simulation and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda provides a wide range of deployment options, including public and private clouds and on-premises setups. Its community support is strong, but enterprise support may vary. OpenText offers excellent customer service with access to knowledgeable engineering teams, making it suitable for companies needing consistent support.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers cost advantages through its open-source version, enabling organizations to use BPM technology without initial fees, despite additional costs for enterprise features. OpenText, with generally higher costs, offers tailored licensing for large enterprises seeking extensive capabilities, deemed reasonable considering its comprehensive support and features.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,623 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 16.0%, down from 21.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	16.0%
OpenText Process Automation	0.7%
Other	83.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."

"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."

"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."

"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."

"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."

"The platform's approach to BPMN modeling is straightforward and versatile, making it easy to adopt and use effectively."

"The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting, though we are at the beginning and need to experiment."

"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."

More Camunda pros

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."

"The migration strategy needs to be improved."

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."

"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."

"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."

"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."

More Camunda cons

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"The integration could improve."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."

"There were some features that were only available in the paid version."

"Camunda's pricing is good."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

"We use a community version."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"We're using the open-source version for now."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"The price is on the higher side."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Mendix vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 12% of the time

OutSystems vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

October 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

September 2025

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

September 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.