Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

Camunda and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0. Camunda holds a 9.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,866 Views
13,354 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

1,427 Views
1,113 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Camunda and OpenText Process Automation both compete in the process automation landscape. Camunda appears to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and developer-friendly environment, although OpenText offers broader functionality at a higher price point.

Features: Camunda offers a lightweight architecture, scalability, and extensive support for BPMN, CMMN, and DMN. Its open-source availability and REST APIs make it flexible for customization. OpenText Process Automation provides robust BPM modules and integration capabilities with comprehensive enterprise application support, appealing to clients seeking extensive pre-designed functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Camunda needs improvements in diagram navigation, forms engine for open-source users, and better documentation. Users find its UI non-intuitive. OpenText Process Automation could enhance its integration model with BPMN 2.0, improve its low-code platform with AI capabilities, and adjust its pricing strategy for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports deployment across private cloud, on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, although enterprise users desire more comprehensive support services. OpenText Process Automation offers similar deployment flexibility, with effective technical support especially for enterprise implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's open-source nature allows for cost-effective solutions with free community editions and enterprise editions offering added features. However, licensing costs may increase with company growth. OpenText Process Automation, while offering a broad feature set, has a higher price point which may deter smaller organizations. Camunda is seen as more affordable while OpenText is attractive for established enterprises seeking extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,333 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (3rd), AI Customer Support (48th), AI IT Support (5th)

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 9.3%, down from 21.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	9.3%
OpenText Process Automation	1.2%
Other	89.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting, though we are at the beginning and need to experiment."

"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."

"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."

"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."

"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."

"The solution is useful for small projects."

"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

More Camunda pros

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"The initial setup can be complex for business users."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

"Initially, installation was challenging, but recent improvements have made it much easier."

"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."

"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."

"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."

More Camunda cons

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"The integration could improve."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"The crucial missing element is the archival function."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."

"I use the open-source free version."

"We're using the open-source version for now."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"The price is on the higher side."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,333 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Insurance Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Mendix vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

February 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

January 2026

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

February 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,333 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.