Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

Camunda and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0. Camunda holds a 9.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,866 Views
13,354 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

1,427 Views
1,113 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Camunda and OpenText Process Automation both compete in the process automation landscape. Camunda appears to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and developer-friendly environment, although OpenText offers broader functionality at a higher price point.

Features: Camunda offers a lightweight architecture, scalability, and extensive support for BPMN, CMMN, and DMN. Its open-source availability and REST APIs make it flexible for customization. OpenText Process Automation provides robust BPM modules and integration capabilities with comprehensive enterprise application support, appealing to clients seeking extensive pre-designed functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Camunda needs improvements in diagram navigation, forms engine for open-source users, and better documentation. Users find its UI non-intuitive. OpenText Process Automation could enhance its integration model with BPMN 2.0, improve its low-code platform with AI capabilities, and adjust its pricing strategy for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports deployment across private cloud, on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, although enterprise users desire more comprehensive support services. OpenText Process Automation offers similar deployment flexibility, with effective technical support especially for enterprise implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's open-source nature allows for cost-effective solutions with free community editions and enterprise editions offering added features. However, licensing costs may increase with company growth. OpenText Process Automation, while offering a broad feature set, has a higher price point which may deter smaller organizations. Camunda is seen as more affordable while OpenText is attractive for established enterprises seeking extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (3rd), AI Customer Support (51st), AI IT Support (5th)

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 9.3%, down from 21.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	9.3%
OpenText Process Automation	1.2%
Other	89.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The use of Java is a big plus for our intern developers, and Camunda scales well, as many of our departments are already using it in production with dedicated teams."

"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."

"The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."

"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."

"The best feature is the automation."

"Camunda's support for BPMN 2.0 is a great advantage because it allows us to have a common language to discuss technology and business in the same perspective."

"The solution is good for data models."

"It is an absolutely stable solution."

More Camunda pros

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation. More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup."

"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."

"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."

"We have to wait to see if Bonita provided us with some features that Camunda does not or if we experience any stability issues."

"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

More Camunda cons

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"The integration could improve."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

"We use a community version."

"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"The price is on the higher side."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Insurance Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Mendix vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

January 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

January 2026

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

February 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.