Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs Temporal comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda improves ROI by reducing costs, enhancing efficiency, saving time, and offering robust BPMN and DMN integration tools.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Camunda's support is helpful but inconsistent, with enterprise users benefiting more, while smaller businesses face pricing and support challenges.
Sentiment score
7.4
Temporal's responsive customer service operates mainly through Slack, with delays for users outside US time zones.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Camunda offers scalability with technologies like Spring Boot and Docker, though database dependencies and auto-scaling improvements remain challenges.
Sentiment score
7.7
Temporal is highly scalable, efficiently managing concurrent workflows with Kubernetes and Cassandra, though debugging can be complex.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Camunda is highly stable and reliable, often scoring 7-10 in stability, with minor issues in integrations and configurations.
Sentiment score
7.1
Users rate Temporal highly for stability despite some infrastructure issues and note challenges with documentation and SDK consistency.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
 

Room For Improvement

Camunda users seek better navigation, customization, integrations, documentation, security, language support, performance, visualization, and support services improvements.
Enhancing Temporal through interface, documentation, scalability, and pricing adjustments can improve user experience and developer support.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
 

Setup Cost

Camunda's enterprise version is costly, prompting many to choose the free edition or seek alternatives for advanced features.
Temporal's open-source model delivers cost-effective workflow management, reducing expenses compared to costly platforms like AWS.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
 

Valuable Features

Camunda offers lightweight, flexible BPMN 2.0 compliance, open-source access, microservices orchestration, and user-friendly tools for process automation.
Temporal efficiently automates workflows with retry mechanisms, fault tolerance, language integration, and durable execution for long-running processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Process Automation
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)
Temporal
Ranking in Process Automation
8th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Peter Broucke - PeerSpot reviewer
Support is good (even the basic one), documentation is readily available and matches the need for agile development
Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow. I know they're working on that or at least communicating about it. They already have versions to run on the cloud, so they've tackled that. We're looking at what they will come up with otherwise. As long as the product gets enough traction and evolves, we're happy. With open source, you can monitor what's happening. If the product is being left by many customers, that's a sign. We're also users of Camunda, and you can watch one of our guides' presentations in the States about one of our implementations. Our focus now is on developing service management and DMN APIs for the platform. AI is something we take into consideration, but we'll see what additional benefits it could bring and how to interconnect it with our data or AI engineering.
AbhishekDash - PeerSpot reviewer
Orchestrates infrastructure tasks like deployment, deletion, and management
Temporal focus on developers rather than business users. In contrast to older workflow orchestration engines like Camunda, which are more business-oriented and strongly emphasize UI and workflow authoring, Temporal is geared toward developers. It provides extensive capabilities for building complex workflows. A standout feature of Temporal is its handling of long-running workflows, a significant advantage over many other solutions. Temporal excels in managing distributed transactions and application state durability, especially in microservice environments where transactions might fail due to network issues. Temporal simplifies these challenges by managing retries, fail-safes, and circuit breakers. As a result, developers don't need to implement these features manually; Temporal handles them implicitly, though it also allows for tuning based on specific needs.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
17%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?
Temporal OSS is expensive in infrastructure, but it brings back the reliability that companies need.
What needs improvement with Temporal?
The actual user interface is still in its early stages. It’s very basic. Users don’t really have a complex permission model yet. Users don’t really have ways to automate things like, for example, p...
What is your primary use case for Temporal?
We [my company] use it to run a large workload. We have a set of security scans we want to perform, and we distribute them over a full day, that’s over 24 hours. We use it to orchestrate all the st...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Temporal and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.